Why does the New York Times hate America? Don’t they know that Muslims are a little angry at the moment? Do they really need to put this Islamofascist propaganda on the front-page? Are they trying to get our soldiers killed?
United States military authorities have taken tougher measures to force-feed detainees engaged in hunger strikes at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, after concluding that some were determined to commit suicide to protest their indefinite confinement, military officials have said.
In recent weeks, the officials said, guards have begun strapping recalcitrant detainees into “restraint chairs,” sometimes for hours a day, to feed them through tubes and prevent them from deliberately vomiting afterward. Detainees who refuse to eat have also been placed in isolation for extended periods in what the officials said was an effort to keep them from being encouraged by other hunger strikers.
The measures appear to have had dramatic effects. The chief military spokesman at Guantánamo, Lt. Col. Jeremy M. Martin, said yesterday that the number of detainees on hunger strike had dropped to 4 from 84 at the end of December.
Some officials said the new actions reflected concern at Guantánamo and the Pentagon that the protests were becoming difficult to control and that the death of one or more prisoners could intensify international criticism of the detention center. Colonel Martin said force-feeding was carried out “in a humane and compassionate manner” and only when necessary to keep the prisoners alive. He said in a statement that “a restraint system to aid detainee feeding” was being used but refused to answer questions about the restraint chairs.
Lawyers who have visited clients in recent weeks criticized the latest measures, particularly the use of the restraint chair, as abusive.
“It is clear that the government has ended the hunger strike through the use of force and through the most brutal and inhumane types of treatment,” said Thomas B. Wilner, a lawyer at Shearman & Sterling in Washington, who last week visited the six Kuwaiti detainees he represents. “It is a disgrace.”
Money graf below the fold:
Since last year, the protests have intensified, a sign of what defense lawyers say is the growing desperation of the detainees. In a study released yesterday, two of those lawyers said Pentagon documents indicated that the military had determined that only 45 percent of the detainees had committed some hostile act against the United States or its allies and that only 8 percent were fighters for Al Qaeda.
Eight percent of these people were affiliated with Al Qaeda. Less than half of them have committed any hostile act against the United States. And let’s be real here. That is according to Pentagon documents. So, that is the rose-colored Rumsfeldian interpretation of the Gitmo population.
I’m proud to be an American where at least I know I’m free,
And I won’t forget the men who died who gave that right to me,
And I gladly stand up next to you and defend her still today,
‘Cause there ain’t no doubt I love this land God Bless the U.S.A.
Well I see your point about inflaming passions, but I’d be more upset about the NYT not releasing information about the U.S. abusing prisoners (which is what it sounds like to me.)
Gitmo is a serious blot on this country. We have held people without charges and without the opportunity to prove their innocence. We have diven the captives to the point of wanting to commit suicide and then we treat them like geese, forcing food down their gullets so that we won’t look bad and so that we can protect the “culture of life” that this administration so embrace.
Gitmo is a national shame. And it will lead to more deaths of American soldiers and civilian targets of terrorism. I don’t blame the NYT though.
I was being sarcastic, and anticipating Bill O’Reilly’s talking points.
Ooops. How embarassing.
Good evenin’. I haven’t been able to stop by lately, much less write, but I felt compelled to let you know that you weren’t alone. As I read the article, I was so focused on the horror of it all that I forgot about BooMan’s opening comments.
And then, when I read your post, I kind of snapped out of it and thought, Hey! Kahli’s right – this is what we’ve been demanding of the media, and BooMan’s saying they shouldn’t have printed it. WTF? What’s wrong with him?
In retrospect, however, I’m delighted that you were the one who posted that comment. :^) But I’m right here with you. Well . . .okay . . .several hours later. (But Hey! Had I been here earlier . . . :^)
Thanks for keeping up the good fight for free speech!
can’t talk about this withouth the accompanying image from the article:

oh, and that’s the actual caption in the photo as provided by E.R.C. Inc
Yup, just ask Miller abouthis great way of preventing any further take on insergency or to get right to the root of the A Q terrorists. Just yet another way to keep shit stirred…
So, adding insult and injury to insult and injury…or just continuing to heap torture on top of torture. The restraint chair, if it’s the same torture object used in our own prisons, is beyond words horrible. Prison reform is one of the things that need doing but doesn’t seem to register with people, either it’s so ugly they can’t face it or they can’t allow themselves to care? I keep hoping that the suffering of our prisoners out of the country will help draw attention to the suffering of our prisoners here and we can bring the whole rotten thing down. But some days I have no hope at all. Afraid this is one of those days.
http://www.patrickcrusade.org/TORTURE_INC.htm
Thanks for the link; prison issues are indeed hard to register with many people.
I seem to remember that some of the people from Abu Ghraib had questionable Corrections backgrounds? one from Utah?
A federal judge put the whole California medical Corrections program into trusteeship because of the barbaric conditions.
I prefer the article from JURIST:
Anymore I just grab the headline ‘o the day and find the actual source docs (where possible).
Thanks for the Links! I wondered if I had slept thru something.
Which, again, begs the question: If 55% [270+-] of these people have been determined, by the DoD, to be “not terrorists”…why are they continuing to hold them?
Yeah, National Security…that’s the ticket.
Peace
Essentially, the US govt has said: “We won’t let you go, even if you aren’t a terrorist, and if you try to kill yourself with the only means available to you, we’ll force you to stay alive so we can detain you for longer.”
I feel sick.