He’s an actor. So? He’s also a Oscar-nominated writer and director, as well as a producer. He collaborates with some of the most fascinating characters in Hollywood, including Steven Soderburgh. While I loved their HBO series, “K Street” (and Howard Dean’s memorable guest role), it was a bit off-the-wall for most audiences and it bombed. But I admire his daring to take creative risks.
Taking risks in this day and age is no small feat. It’s frightening to express one’s self on issues about which one feels deeply or is dubious about, or to even dare to question the presumptions of others without being pilloried by most anyone, often being blind-sided. It’s even verboten to express uncertainty or confusion. Yet he persists. He’s a good role model while those in Hollywood who are too PC, and who wish to shut down other voices, are not. He even dares to criticize Michael Moore, and I happen to agree with Clooney’s take on Moore (god help me), although I’ve enjoyed Moore’s films very much:
Not everybody thought so. When Good Night, and Good Luck came out in the States, Clooney braced himself for the rightwing backlash. He is fairly accustomed to it by now. His first high-profile departure from the official version of history was in the film Three Kings in 1999, in which he played a cynical (but ultimately good) renegade US soldier in the first Gulf war. But it was his visible attendance at early peace demonstrations against the current war in Iraq that really made him a target.
“Oh yeah,” he says, “they put me on the cover of a magazine with a banner across my chest that said ‘traitor’. And they organised a picket for the movie I was in. Sean Penn and Tim Robbins were on the list, the usual guys, and Woody Harrelson, who calls me up and goes, ‘What do we do?’ And Michael Moore’s going, ‘What you have to do is . . .’ and I said, ‘Let me handle this one.’ Because some of them tend to be heavy-handed. And I find that humour is a much better way to do it.”
Clooney is quite sniffy about Moore, whose modus operandi he finds obnoxious and counter-productive. He uses his name as a verb – “I don’t Michael Moore this shit,” he says. “I don’t come out and go, ‘Look what these fuckers do.'” He thinks subtlety – class – gets better results. He is no doubt right, but it seems a little unfair given that dissent is a lot more palatable when it comes in the shape of George Clooney. His response to the traitor incident was to put together a montage of prominent people on the anti-war side, including the pope, Jimmy Carter, Nelson Mandela and Pat Buchanan (a hard-right commentator in the US) and drape the word “traitors” across them, too. “Then I made 800 fliers anonymously and sent them to everyone in the media. And I waited. And Dan Rather [CBS news anchor] called me and said, have you seen this flier that’s going around? And I said, ‘My quote would be, the Pope and I can take it, but don’t pick on Pat Buchanan.'” He grins. “You know, the truth is . . . it is not merely your right but your duty to question your government. You can’t demand freedom of speech and then say, but don’t say bad things about me. You gotta be a grown-up and take your hits.”
Still, when the pro-war lobby fought back he was initially unnerved. “I remember when they were picketing the movie theatre for me and I called my dad and said, ‘Er, so, am I in trouble?’ I mean, you know. And he’s like, ‘Shut up. Mohammed Ali went to prison for protesting against Vietnam, and you’re worried about making a little bit less money? Grow up. Be a man.’ And he was right.” Inevitably, he says, his dad has become a little “more Catholic” as he’s grown older and they fight now about different things. “Like gay marriage to him is not OK. We’ve had some knock-down drag-outs about those kind of things.”
Clooney is sufficiently battle-hardened these days to shrug it off when people have a go at him. “I was at a party the other night and it was all these hardcore Republicans and these guys are like, ‘Why do you hate your country?’ I said, ‘I love my country.’ They said, ‘Why, at a time of war, would you criticise it then?’ And I said, ‘My country right or wrong means women don’t vote, black people sit in the back of buses and we’re still in Vietnam. My country right or wrong means we don’t have the New Deal.’ I mean, what, are you crazy? My country, right or wrong? It’s not your right, it’s your duty. And then I said, ‘Where was I wrong, schmuck?’ In 2003 I was saying, where are the ties [between Iraq] and al-Qaida? Where are the ties to 9/11? I knew it; where the fuck were these Democrats who said, ‘We were misled’? That’s the kind of thing that drives me crazy: ‘We were misled.’ Fuck you, you weren’t misled. You were afraid of being called unpatriotic.” .
The article in The Guardian is called “”I’ve learned how to fight’,” and the box quote says … continued below …
… “George Clooney can’t seem to leave the US government alone: his two new films both tackle high-level corruption. He tells Emma Brockes why his father’s legacy of protest haunts him to this day.”
He resisted the temptation to play Murrow himself. Instead he plays Murrow’s producer, Fred Friendly, because, “the secret to Murrow is that there is a sadness to him. You always felt that he was carrying the weight of the world on his shoulders, and that’s not something that you can act, it’s something that you just sort of are. …
Isn’t that how YOU feel often? Sad, like you have the weight of the world on your shoulders? Because you see so much and read so much and care so much? With so much to address in this world — from war, to censorship, to WTO protestors still filing suit — over eight years after the November 1997 protests — over their loss of their rights to free speech, with great artists attacked for their creative works, it is a small miracle that Clooney is still able to make movies that take on all comers. I look forward to more from him.
Yes, there is a great sadness in me that reaches the depths of my soul. There is a sadness that very few seem to care when a 28 year veteran of the CIA speaks out against the administration. Ex CIA Agent
Dammit, Leezy … I would have FP’d that story but I was spending too much time yesterday working on our RSS link issues … send me an e-mail when you post something like that.
And thanks for linking it here.
The only thing that keeps me going — through all the crap, through all the external/internal turmoil — is that I have to think first of my daughter and future generations. We simply have to fight. Even if we lose, which is more and more likely, especially as we cannibalize each other. And I’m willing to bend — from removing an image that offends others to supporting centrist Democrats — because I feel I need to be flexible. And I want to see if, when Democrats are able to achieve a majority in Congress again and hopefully live in the Whitye House, they can stand up, stop this insanity, and take on the real problems facing this country, like health care, disability, education, etc.
Yes, it will be interesting to see if they will stand up once they have the power and address the real issues such as you mention.
And yes, George Clooney is a fighter and he doesn’t give a flying F what others say. We need more of that!!
I keep wondering what would happen if some big Hollywood star–Clooney would be perfect!–came out and ran on a third party ticket.
Someone with no stake in professional politics (except of course his love for his country), someone with lots and lots of money, huge public support and name recognition–and nothing to lose but some of his time and some of his money.
I wonder.
Clooney/Winfrey 2008!
(actually, I’d rather see Whoopi as veep, but strategically, I think Oprah would be a better bet).
I mean, if anyone can run for pres in this country, why not Clooney?
PS…worked for Arnie, didn’t it?
Damn straight it did. And it’s working for that football hero and ‘winger Lyn Swann (sp?) who’s running for governor of Pennsylvania against Ed Rendell … his primary opponent just dropped out so he’ll likely face Rendell in the general.
Swann has ZERO political or government experience. Appalling.
At least Clooney reads constantly, and is in regular touch with lots of active politicians and thinkers … anybody who can write all that insider shit about K Street has to be in the know — he’d be far better, and he’d be smart enough to get good advice.
I wonder what his legal state of residence is. California? Or Tennessee? Isn’t that where his dad ran for Congress last year and lost? (Wish I could remember what state that was.)
I know Rosemary Clooney lives in Kentucky, so he at least has roots in the upper southeast. I’d love to see George run for just about anything.
Right-o. And his dad ran for congress in Kentucky in 2004, didn’t he.
George may have made his legal residence Kentucky so he could vote for his dad. Otherwise, he’d most likely vote in California or New York.
Kentucky’s two GOP senators are Mitch McConnell and Jim Bunning.
Wonder when they’re running again.
Oprah is no progressive. Anti-labor. Pro Wal-Mart.
Exploits women’s insecurities. Talks about women being strong, but then accepts advertising from companies that make bucks by convincing women they are too old, too fat, too wrinkley, etc.
Fascinating. How is she anti-labor and pro-WalMart? I’d really like to know.
Does she own stock in WalMart?
P.S. I only caught snippets (because MSNBC and CNN were drooling all over the story), but I thought she was a bit rough on that author who made up some stuff in his book about getting off drugs. Talk about a set-up for a relapse by him. And it was sad that Gay Talese’s wife (that is his wife, right? — the editor of his book?) got bashed by Oprah so hard.
Well, when SAG and AFTRA were on strike and could get no coverage of the issues, Oprah wouldn’t lift a finger to help, despite being a member.
As for Walmart, when she did a show on how to decorate inexpensively, guess where she directed her viewers for the great buys.
Perhaps I over-stated in my first post. But I do believe Oprah is not progressive — she’s expedient.
I know. I consider Oprah a complete and total sellout. As I said, Oprah would be a strategic compromise. She has a lot of support, esp among blk women. She does.
So what other Hollywood stars might qualify?
Spader? Sarandon?
(sorry, I’m so bad with names….part of why I used Oprah as an example was that I couldn’t think of anyone else).
I also wouldn’t be adamant about it having to be a third-party candidate–if (like yeah right) the Dems were smart enough, they could ‘recruit’ one of them and put em on the ticket.
I mean, isn’t that essentially what the GOP did in 1980 when they put a third-rate, two-bit actor on the ticket?
Difference being: Clooney etal are not two-big, third-rate actors.
I don’t want him to run for office (as dreamy as it would be to have President Clooney – I’d gladly be a consenting intern). I want him to use the fund-raising power he likely has to support progressive candidates and to whip the Democrats into shape.
After the scAlito scandal, I’m now (sadly) convinced: trying to whip the dems into shape is like beating a dead horse, at best–like trying to teach an old donkey new tricks.
The dems, with very few exceptions, have repeatedly demonstrated that they have too big an investment in the status quo themselves that they will never have enough spine to do what is needed to repair the damage that has been done to this country in the last five (and counting) years.
After they refused to stand up to the election fraud issue, I continued to support them (am still trying by signing petitions, emailing, writing, etc., but no contributions and no campaign support from me).
About 8 mos ago, I had a conversation with a high-ranking state level dem–heavy-duty dem ‘insider’. He basically confirmed for me that the reason the dems did not fight the election fraud issue was that they, too, had a vested interest in keeping their ‘options open’ in this regard.
Still…until scAlito scandal, I was prepared to stick with the dead horse/old donkey as the lesser of two evils, pragmatic solution to our political woes.
Now I’m reaching for the stars: I think we need a big Hollywood name. Geez, if John Stewart can host the Oscars and O’Lielly can come out saying Steve Colbert’s not that bad a guy (as in this wks issue of Newsweek), hell, anything’s possible.
I think we need to be looking to Hollywood, not DC for a winning ticket in 2008.
I find it hard to argue with you.
When Republicans were pointing out that a Democratric-majority Congress voted in Scalia by an overwhelming margin (90+ yes for confirmation), my heart sank further.
But. I see no other way to have a chance … although I love your imaginative idea.
Someone outside the box is what you’re proposing. Like an Eisenhower type … or a movie star, because every American sees them on magazine covers while they’re in line at the grocery store.
Well, shit, Susan…wanna take the idea and run with it? (You know I’m too erratic, disorganized and nutty to do it effectively).
Why not hash the idea around–see if there’s enough support for a blog-driven campaign to recruit Clooney.
Mobilize the majority! It’d be just like in the movies.
The happy end.
Blockbuster.
Ticket sales anyone?
It certainly would take care of the “mindless media” problem–these guys ARE the media–not the news media, the entertainment media.
You been watching Spader on Boston Legal?
Shit. The truthiness of Law and Order, etc. is closer to the truth than what you get on cable news. (Olbermann excluded).
Have you checked out the newsweek article on Colbert/Stewart
I’m telling you the truthiness: Hollywood’s the ticket, not DC. In fact, I was already saying a similar thing right after the election: like where the fuck is SPRINGSTEEN?
How bout Redford? (Now that’d be a way to pull a Reagan on em!)
All the president’s men, yo.
LMAO
Redford or Clooney are cool … but tell them I’ll only suppor them if they are willing to promise to appoint Woody Harrelson head of the FDA.
I want to make a small remark, (sort of a counterpoint to what Clooney’s apparent view is), regarding what I believe is the valuable part Michael Moore plays in our current political discourse.
It’s pretty simple really. For me Michael Moore embodies a radical approach to the current state of affairs, and I think this role of “radical” is an extremelyimportant component to our broad discourse about all thats going on. For me, a “Radical” voice plays the important part of reminding us how fucked up things really are and how outraged we should be during those (inevitable) times when we tend to settle into a “too-comfortable” or “let’s protest but make sure we can still get home in time for dinner” mindset.
Sometimes we need loud, even abrasive voices yelling from the rooftops just to get our attention; just to pentrate the insulation and denial behind which so many protect their creature=comfort oriented lifestyles.
There’s an old saying about a mule, a saying that addresses the problem of inattentiveness. Sometimes you have to smack him right between the eyes with a big stick just to get his attention. Michael Moore and a few others perform this function, and even though it’s not necessarily effective in and of itself at getting the opposition to recognize theerror of their ways, it is effective in getting a lot of peoples’ attention, people who might not otherweise have joined the effort of speaking out against the monsters runing the country and the world into the abyss.
So, I’m thankful for Michael Moore, and I sincerely hope his voice doesn’t become “homogenized” like so many others’ are.
Absolutely!
One of my most exciting evenings here was the night that the local theatre owner decided to go with “Fahrenheit 911” — he never puts on “indy” films — and the crowd ran down the street, and we all had to buy tickets way in advance of the show. And the long, long lines went on for days … I made a point of driving by to check on the lines! š
Sadly, he aired it in the crappy old theatre with a rotten screen. But at least it was here.
Remember his show on Bravo? I got a kick out of several of his “adventures.”
But there was one that pissed me off. He made fun of then Secretary of Defense William Cohen for writing poetry. Moore kept saying, “How can we have a Secretary of Defense who writes poetry?” Like it wasn’t manly. Imho, if anything, Cohen’s interest in poetry should have been celebrated. (I’m not saying Cohen was a great guy, but to make fun of him for that was in poor taste.)
I wasn’t aware of his having demeaned poetry writing by using it to disparage the likes of William Cohen, but, even radicals screw up sometimes.
I think the Hollywood connection, (even though it’s illegitimately defined by the wingnuts), would work quite effectively against clooney in a campaign on this scale. sure it worked for Schwarzenegger, but Schwarzenegger is a cartoon, and there are a lot of really stup[id and childishly simpleminded voters out there.
But if that’swhat it took to win from Hollywood, I don’t think we’d want a candidate like that. Clooney is very articulate and seesm to be able to get access to microphones and speaking venues in general. I think this is the arena in which, at least for the present, he can do the most good; messaging and educationg, spreading the word.
that he’s not interested in running for office. That he’s inhaled waaayyy too much to be a viable candidate…
Good. He’ll be much more effective that way.
Generally, those who run for office are the lesser stars in the political constellation anyway. It is the great minds, the visionary thinkers whose ideas the candidates try to appropriate as their own who are the real stars.
Absolutely!
And though I like Clooney, I don’t think it was particularly right or smart for that gratuitous swipe of Michael Moore. The right wing smear machine can turn him into a caricature too.
I’m all for using humor, etc. and but there are just FAR too many people who can’t handle facts as presented them, straight up, no chaser. This sugar-coating, this denial–it makes no sense.
Besides, it seems that everyone can have a strong opinion EXCEPT for progressives.
Anyway, I’m just glad to have some decent film work to watch, whether from him or Michael Moore.
I agree the gratuitous swipe was not so smart, but you know, by degrees of dumbness, what the dems are doing is the kind of dumbness that can get you killed, the dumbness of the gratuitous swipe was the kind of dumbness that maybe gets you locked out of the house.
It would definitely be good if we could ever get the left to quit eating its own: ONE single approach is never going to succeed.
We need many approaches: from radical, hard-hitting, fuck-you-and-the-war-you rode in on to the kinder, gentler humourous approach of a Clooney, to the biting satire of Steven Colbert that is so sophisticated that folks like O’Lielly don’t even get (cf. Newsweek. If we could all quit insisting “no my way is better, no mine, etc), even the appeasing, eye-candy compromise of an Obama or H. Clinton would have its place.
This is why I keep getting so upset about the left’s continued defamation of the radical left. Our numbers are much bigger than most people think. Who makes up the lion’s share of non-voters in this country? Texas rednecks, or radicals on the left who are so fed up with both the right and the left-that-is-not-even-left?
Clooney has to separate himself from Moore. He has to. Or, he’ll be lumped in with Moore and never grow o his own in this particular field, which is competitive, and highly charged right now.
Moore’s F9/11 left Pubbies and cons gasping and they have been in permanent and costly damage control mode ever since. Moore opened the door to mainstream public awareness of the administration using lies against the public, since then Greenwald, including his earlier work has risen, as has several others who were obscure precursors.
Now comes Clooney into the fray,and against the Greenwald’s, and the BBC even, let alone Moore. George better stand out, or he’ll be stuck in the shade permanently.
I love George Clooney! Oh, yes, I love his intelligence and integrity, too.
We’ve GOT to watch the Academy Awards. If he wins at least one of the three Oscars he’s nominated for, it’ll be a treat to hear his acceptance speech.
You caught him on the Golden Globes when he accepted for Best Supporting Actor in Syriana?
And he thanked Jack Abramoff — and paused, then said, “Who’d name their kid Jack with a last name that ends in off?”
(Then Abramoff’s father wrote a column attacking Clooney … it was all so hilarious.)
Yeah, I thought it was hysterical that Abramoff’s father was worried that Jack doughter was embrassed by what Clooney said, but, not apparently, by Jack’s behavior.
to George Clooney. Saw him on 60 Minutes and before that heard that he thanked Jack Abramoff for his Golden Globe. (Just to familiarize millions with the name.)
Gotta go but I had to stop in to say,
I love George Clooney.
Here is a pretty extensive Clooney biography for anyone who’s interested.
Love the diary.
Love George Clooney.
But where’s the picture!!!
George is very cool. Too cool to run for President, I’m afraid. Should I be wrong, I’m open to persuasion.