I think I’m becoming one of those rare people that learn to love their abuse. I’m actually starting to get a kick out of reading assaults on my sensibilities…like the following.
“We’ve been after the vice president since Sunday, as everyone has, and our efforts paid off,” said John Moody, Fox’s senior vice president for news editorial. “I think he wanted to make sure he got a fair interview and a good interview — good in the sense of thorough — and Brit is sort of the preeminent journalist in Washington right now.”
It’s hard to pack so much bullshit into such a short statement. But John Moody got the job done. He’s cleary a maestro of bullshit. I mean, just look at this:
While Fox News is known for its outspoken conservative commentators, network officials reject the idea that partisanship creeps into its coverage.
“What we try to do is not shut out any points of view,” Moody said.
Cheney “wouldn’t have come to Brit Hume if he wanted a softball interview,” he added, calling the criticism sour grapes. “Look, we’re not the only news network in the country, and when you aren’t getting the big interview and when you aren’t winning, you have to think of a reason why.”
I’m not even going to waste my breath rebutting this clownery. I leave it to Princeton’s Harry Frankfurt:
One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern, nor attracted much sustained inquiry.
In consequence, we have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. And we lack a conscientiously developed appreciation of what it means to us.
Part of the problem, and consultants bear this out, is that we have been so subjected to bullshit that we have come to enjoy the experience. As the media never tires of telling us, their product is finely tuned to our tastes. They wouldn’t give us bullshit unless we were craving bullshit.
But I think this is a bunch of baloney. What we are craving is just a little grain, a speck, an iota of truth.
In this environment, people that step up and say something true get enormous, almost irrational rewards. Dean’s straightforwardness on the phony war in Iraq won him some of the most devoted acolytes in recent political history. John Murtha told the truth about the war, and despite being a DINO, he instantly became a hero on the left. Al Gore gave some fiery speeches and suddenly his past failures were forgotten and people clamored for him to run for the presidency again. Paul Hackett called the President a son-of-a-bitch and a chickenhawk and his blog-o-fame was launched.
Anyone who wants to be the next president should take heed. People are dying for the truth. And FOX News ain’t providing it.
Clownery…that could be my new favoirite word if it weren’t for the fact that the dung that’s being flung at us wasn’t so dangerous in it’s results.
I think that 3/4 of the people in this country need their bullshit filters replaced because too much is getting through as the real thing.
is a great paragraph. How the Democratic leadership can ignore the evidence in front of them and continue their triangulation game is a mystery. As I think Murtha said, people are starving for leadership.
it’s even better now that I fixed the spelling and syntax.
Bullshit is too nice a term. This is disinformation, pure and simple. And if that’s too many syllables, call it was it really is: lies. This administration lies. Our government lies. Our media lies. And one of the reasons they do it because WE do. Most people lie. Some people consider it a badge of honor to be able to lie well (see Richard Helms after he was charged with perjury re the CIA’s plans to overthrow Allende.)
But these aren’t even random, personal lies. This is state-sponsored, strategic disinformation geared to keep people from seeing what’s really going on. THAT is why lies concern me.
Cheney is for once, scared not quite bullshitless. But he’s scared. Why? The fact that he would only talk to Fox tells me more clearly than any of his words could that he’s got something to hide. What is it?? Did he deliberately shoot the guy? Did Harry say something Cheney didn’t like? The cover-up implies there is much more to this story. Lies are beacons that point the way to the truth, if we only will follow them….
The fact that he would only talk to Fox tells me more clearly than any of his words could that he’s got something to hide.
Yep. I mean, really–can’t folks just call bullshit, for once? No one waits 24 hours before releasing information like this on accidental actions.
But one might wait 24 hours if s/he has to take that long to get their shit straight. And dry out.
true true. he said that they wanted to inform the family first and not the whole world. fine. that takes what, a few phone calls to the closest family members? and then what, you contact 2nd, 3rd cousins and arrange for flowers for the next 20 hours?
they were indeed very much getting their stories straight. rehersing the stories and making sure everyone was in line. and then, they told W.
Yep. And if Cheney was sooooo concerned about his friend, wouldn’t he stay with him? He’s the president after all. :<)
I don’t buy one word of it. Cheney is a congenital liar.
Yes! Someone finally says it. That was my first thought as well. If that were me, I would have been devastated. I would have gone straight to the hospital, and probably would still be there. That’s the one thing that I don’t understand about these people. Call me naive but where’s the fucking compassion?
Where’s the compassion? George drank most of it and let Dickless finish the rest.
[I just LOVE your handle! Like I haven’t told you before, I know, but I get such a kick out of it. :<)]
lol thanks 😉
…and Brit is sort of the preeminent stenographer/Cheney bathwater drinker in Washington right now.
There. Much better.
And a hell of a lot more accurate.
Best laugh I’ve had all day.
LOL!!!
You’re learning to enjoy it too!
Just an honest look at the evidence, or lack of evidence that is the foundation of the GWoT would remove the Bush admin justification for many of the unnecessary problems we face today.
Everyone assumes that all the claims are true and then work hard to deny any truth that does attempt to surface. Truth is not rewarded; compliance is.
Cheney “wouldn’t have come to Brit Hume if he wanted a softball interview,” he added
Yeah, right. The sad thing is that he would have gotten a softball interview from any other journalist too. They only have balls when they travel in packs, and Cheney is too much of a coward to hold a news conference.
They only have balls when they travel in packs
Thanks for that! I needed that laugh out loud moment!
Colbert Report coined the phrase. Just enough real information to try and make one believe the lies. I am so glad I never liked Kool Aid, even as a kid.
We should buy you a beer for sloshing through that sewage and sharing with us.
Yeah, Booman has been working hard in general the last couple of days. He deserves to put his feet up, relax and have a cold beer.
I had a professor once that claimed that while he doesn’t always recognize bullshit when he reads it, he does when he hears it. So when he’s in doubt about a student paper, he reads it to himself, aloud.
Works with the Wall Street Journal, too.
I think it’s important to recognize that any accomplished swindler or bullshitter knows that it’s not necessary to lie to people to deceive them; that partial truths and out of context truths and overly simplistic truths are often at the core of the “bullshit” spiels. con men and bullshitters know that while many of us do crave the truth, that for the ost part people prefer to believe what they want to believe and are not so eager to wantto hear truths that conflict with those beliefs or otherwise make them uncomfortable.
Any bullshitter worth his salt knows how to exploit our desire to believe some things and our reluctance to believe others. Truth plays a role in this calculus toa certain extent, but it is not treally as much of a determinant as we would perhaps like to believe.
For instance, how difficult must it be for the parents to accept that what their childis telling them about being molested by the parishj priest is true? A ghastly example of how our resistance to the truth can so easily interfeere with our best interests, despite our best intentions and despite our belief that “of course we want to know the truth”.
Or consider this other slighty different example. Let’s say it was an unassailable fact that the systems that sustain our society are unsustainable and that if we are to be able to survive and move forward as a culture we have to relinquish a good many of the creature comforts and excesses of our current lifestyles to do so. Could anyone running for political office have even a remote chance of winning if his message was; “We must abandon many of the conveniences and comforts of our way of life now if we’re to have a life at all in the future!” I doubt anyone running on that platform would get even 1% of the vote, despite the ecological consciousness of the left.
Bullshit is always intended to deceive and it accomplishes this in many different ways, either by diverting attention away from something important by magnifying something else, by attacking the credibility of those with an opposing view in order to assert one’s own superiority, by making the target audience feel guilty for even thinking things they don’t want them to think about; then list is endless.
When confronting bullshit I usually ask; “What are they trying to get me to believe?” “What are they trying to prevent or inhibit me from discovering?” “Who are they targeting with this bulshit message?” and; “Who Benefits?”
cross-posted at Big Orange.
CNN has a tape of Bush answering questions from the press (all softballs) a few minutes ago. Cheney is apparently still too cowardly to face journalists. When you look ineffective and gutless compared to our fearless leader, it’s time to get out of politics.
Oh Yeah, right!!!!!!
look at what I found…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
« Daily (News) Show — the One That’s Also About Cheney | Main
Bookmark Attytood
E-mail Will Bunch
Blackhawk Gone: Why wasn’t Whittington airlifted?
Here’s just one more unanswered question about Dick Cheney’s shooting of his 78-year-old friend last Saturday.
Numerous news accounts in recent years suggest that the vice president, with his history of four heart attacks, is almost always accompanied by a medical team and by Blackhawk helicopters, even when he is hunting in remote rural locations, as he all too frequently does.
Cheney has apparently never needed that type of medical evacuation. But on Saturday, his hunting pal Harry Whittington did. Indeed, news accounts say that Cheney’s full-time medical team was on the scene and aided the seriously wounded man.
But where were the Blackhawks? If they were on the Armstrong Ranch, why were they not used for this type of emergency operation that they had long rehearsed? If the Blackhawks were not there, why not, considering they’ve reportedly been there for his other trips?
Instead, the splayed and profusely bleeding Whittington was driven to a small rural hospital — even though when he got there, doctors then realized his condition was critical enough to airlift him, by a private helicopter, to the bigger medical center in Corpus Christi.
The bottom line is that it took almost two-and-a-half hours and probably more to get this wounded man to the best trauma center in South Texas. Whittington, of course, is a private citizen. Do you think it would have taken that long if Cheney had been wounded or stricken. It seems like either a case of unequal treatment, or incompetency.
We’ve been meaning to look into this all week. In August of 2004, we took our annual family vacation in the Jackson Hole area, coincidentally while the vice president was also there. And during our stay, all the locals were buzzing about this incident, which actually involved buzzing…buzzing helicopters. Cheney’s helicopters:
Still, nothing quite prepared people for the brazen invasion earlier this month atop the normally bucolic Snake River in Grand Teton National Park. In full view of rafters, tourists and residents, two Black Hawk helicopters skimmed the river.
Angry river users shook their fists. Wildlife tumbled over from the choppers’ downdraft, witnesses said. Plants were rippling in the high winds, they said.
“They were at tree-top levels,” said Martin Hagen, a captain who navigates the river for a rafting company. “Here you go out for a quiet day along the river and suddenly comes this great noise. It was a big, big disturbance.”
Another boat captain, Reed Finley, had just dropped passengers ashore when the choppers buzzed three times.
“They sent an osprey into a tailspin, flipping it over,” he said. “It was obnoxious.”
The park rangers at Grand Teton National Park were flooded with complaints. The lead ranger called the Secret Service detail guarding Cheney to complain because he had no other number: The National Park Service has no way to communicate with military aircraft. The choppers were violating park service rules not to fly lower than 2,000 feet.
What were the helicopters doing? You guessed it.
Kim Tisor, a spokeswoman at Ft. Carson, Colo., where the helicopters are based, said the Black Hawks were practicing medical evacuation. As she put it, “a high-security mission” in the area (that is, Cheney) means that the helicopters need to practice nearby.
Helicopters are never far from Cheney when he hunts. Like in 2003 in Wyoming:
A trio of Blackhawk helicopters carrying Vice President Dick Cheney used protected land in Puzzleface Ranch as a landing and launching pad Sunday, witnesses reported.
The administration’s mechanical birds buzzed Skyline Pond, which is osprey and trumpeter swan habitat, 18 times through three landings and takeoffs, neighbor J.C. Whitfield said Tuesday.
Or last year in Montana:
Whether because of security concerns or because Vice President Dick Cheney is trying to protect a favorite fishing hole, few details about his visit to the Bighorn River were being released publicly.
Cheney flew into Billings early Monday morning and headed down to Fort Smith to do some fishing. His plane, Air Force Two, was accompanied by a C-17 cargo jet, two Chinook helicopters and two Blackhawk helicopters. Beyond that, mum has been the word on the vice president’s visit.
And remember his famous hunting trip with Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia?
Two military Black Hawk helicopters were brought in and hovered nearby as Cheney and Scalia were whisked away in a heavily guarded motorcade to a secluded, private hunting camp owned by an oil industry businessman.
Now, after all that, here’s what happened when there was an actual medical emergency. The Corpus Christi Caller-Times (has that paper put itself on the map, or what?) had an outstanding medical timeline yesterday. We’ll summarize the highlights:
5:30 to 5:50 p.m. Saturday: Whittington is shot.
6 p.m. Cheney’s medical team makes two decisions. They alert an outside helicopter service (where were those Blackhawks?), but they decided to drive Whittington to the small, closer (but not that close) hospital in Kingsville, Tex.
6:20 p.m. (20 minutes later!) Ambulance arrives.
6:45-6:50 p.m. Whittington arrives at the first hospital, after a 25-30 minute drive.
7:07 p.m. Doctors immediately realize that Whittington needs to go to the trauma center. The outside helicopter service is called a second time.
7:29 p.m. Air ambulance arrives at Kingsville.
8:19 p.m. Whittington finally arrives at the Corpus Christi hospital.
That’s anywhere from two hours and 49 minutes to 2 hours and 29 minutes, for an elderly man who’s been blasted in his face and torso with birdshot, with fragments in his heart and possibly other vital organs.
We’ll ask again one more time. Would it have taken that long for Cheney, a vice president who’s known to live in the style of a monarch? Something doesn’t add up here.
we used the word differently. When people said lying, wordy, bullshit stuff, our response was, “Bullshit!” Now, people seem to say something like, “I call bullshit on that.” Just an old-age recollection, but adding those extra words seems to take some of the punch out of it.
But right on, Booman! The truth rocks ;o
A little OT…OK, a lot OT, but reading that reminded me of one of my favorite memories of my grandfather:
The way he said “shit.”
This was no ordinary pronunciation. He’d draw it out, so it was more like, “SHEEeeeeee.” It’s like it meant a combination of “don’t screw with me with your lying, wordy, bullshit stuff”…along with a dash of dismissive humor.
As kids, nothing was funnier. As an adult, it’s still funny…but it’s now more the laugh-to-keep-from-crying-‘cuz-I-get-it-now variety.
Yup. None of this “truthiness” bullshit for them!
but we couldn’t have him talking to a real journalist..Wait are there any left in network news anyway? LOL But I agree it is all bullshit.