The DNC is soliciting bids from cities that are interested in hosting the 2008 Democratic Convention. These conventions may surprise us again some day, but they have become nothing but expensive commercials and a big party for big donors and mega-activists. The choice of venue has limited value in assisting the candidate’s prospects. Nevertheless, the venue can help modestly in the state in which it is held. And since that is much more important than whether Paul Begala has a good time, let’s take a look at the options.
Anaheim, CA- totally irrelevent
Dallas, TX- totally irrelevent
Denver, CO- very strong candidate. The state is purple and it would be a big boost to the state. I don’t think any convention has ever taken place in a Mountain state.
Detroit, MI- Not bad. This is a purple state. And it has the added advantage of making the delegates uncomfortable.
Las Vegas, NV- not a good image for the party, nor a good way to prevent outbreaks of scandal. But it could help turn Nevada blue. Harry Reid probably likes this choice.
Minneapolis, MN- good choice. Purple state, the city deserves it, and it will be August so people won’t even notice the cold.
New Orleans, LA- the sentimental favorite. I think most of the Democrats in Louisiana now reside in Houston. So, maybe this isn’t the best option.
New York, NY- Now, that is a seriously tired idea.
Orlando, FL- in August? That is just cruel. Can we give up on Florida already?
Phoenix, AZ- They say it’s a dry heat.
San Antonio, TX- Just to piss off Bush? I don’t think so.
