Dan Eggen reports on the Bush administration’s latest panicked efforts to stave off their destruction. Going hand in hand with Bill Frist’s desperate effort to stop a Senate Intelligence Committee investigation of the NSA wiretaps, the administration:
seeking to limit leaks of classified information, has launched initiatives targeting journalists and their possible government sources. The efforts include several FBI probes, a polygraph investigation inside the CIA and a warning from the Justice Department that reporters could be prosecuted under espionage laws.
In recent weeks, dozens of employees at the CIA, the National Security Agency and other intelligence agencies have been interviewed by agents from the FBI’s Washington field office, who are investigating possible leaks that led to reports about secret CIA prisons and the NSA’s warrantless domestic surveillance program, according to law enforcement and intelligence officials familiar with the two cases.
Every week, it seems, new revelations come out about how the Bush administration has tortured someone, or disappeared someone to a eastern European gulag, or pissed on someone’s Koran, or infiltrated some Quaker peace group, or authorized some illegal wiretapping. We continue to learn how the intelligence agencies were bullied, fed bad information by Cheney and company, tasked to solve the wrong problems…and how their advice went largely ignored…and then they were blamed for producing a flawed product.
The intelligence agencies have been fighting back, and the leaks have taken a steady toll on the Bush administration’s credibility.
“Almost every administration has kind of come in saying they want an open administration, and then getting bad press and fuming about leaks,” said David Greenberg, a Rutgers University journalism professor and author of “Nixon’s Shadow.” “But it’s a pretty fair statement to say you haven’t seen this kind of crackdown on leaks since the Nixon administration.”
The Nixon crackdown came from a select group of idiots commonly known as The Plumbers.
The Plumbers came to include several Watergate figures. E. Howard Hunt was recommended by (Tex) Colson and G. Gordon Liddy was recommended by (Egil) Krogh. Liddy coined his own sensitivity indicator for the group in the form of “ODESSA” for “Organization Directed to Eliminate the Subversion of the Secrets of the Administration”.4 The name reflects Liddy’s admiration for German-style intelligence operations as ODESSA was also the name of a Nazi fugitive network.
The new ODESSA program has the same goals. The Bush administration wants to stop any congressional investigation into the NSA case and the secret prisons because they know their actions are illegal and cannot stand up to public scrutiny. They also want to stop the leaking that is causing congressional curiosity in the first place. And if that means intimidating journalists, the Bush administration is willing to appeal to anachronistic and highly controversial laws, like the 1917 Espionage Act.
We are witnessing a massive cover-up. The Bush administration threatens journalists, launches a witchhunt within the intelligence community, and when Pat Roberts can’t control his intelligence committee, they have Bill Frist threaten to change the rules to prevent a hearing.
These are desperation tactics.
Let’s not forget who’s actually doing the leaking (same article):
They can’t have it all ways. If they really wanted to prosecute leakers, half the top WH staff would be indicted. And the major dailies need to get off their collective dead asses and remind the public of the climate of secrecy since they took office.
Or just read Waxman’s Report on point.
Frist from his letter to Reid:
Emphasis mine – here and below.
This from the Newsweek article of 2/20/06:
Can’t find the White Rabbit, but I’m pretty sure we’re in Wonderland.
This is a BIG fight.
I’m gonna pimp my diary-“Nuclear Option: Frist threatens to block NSA hearings”, posted last night, that’s rolling into cyberspace. It goes into some detail here.
Cheney has been working with Sen. Roberts to shutdown the committee-pre war intel, now it’s the NSA hearings. As Sen. Reid said last November, […] “nothing happens with intelligence unless signed off on by Cheney” Yea, he said, “you can circle it.”
As bad(and it really is BAD!) as it is regarding the machinations of this effing admin, can anyone imagine what would be happening if there had been no leaks. I constantly remind myself of that wall at the cia that posts the stars representing those that gave their lives for this country. Unamed and forever to remain a secret, and these pieces of shite are trying to stifle any single bit of info that they don’t want us to have!
These “leakers” are the only thing standing in the way of the arrival of a totally facistic state.
Bravo to them all and bravo to those that will pick up the flags faster than these brown shirts silence their predessors!
billjpa@aol.com
These are desperation tactics.
Kristallnacht was desperation tactics, too.
As I have been saying for several years…these people cannot AFFORD to lose. Their very asses are on the line, here.
It’s not as if they will be able to retire back into the system should they be defeated. No San Clemente for them.
San Quentin, if they are lucky.
They cannot AFFORD to lose.
Watch.
It’s going to get worse before it gets better.
IF it gets better on this level.
I hope it will get better, but there were Germans who hoped it would get better, too. Right up until crunch time.
Then it was essentially out of German hands, the “getting better”.
As one of the first victims of this move to power said some 40 years ago: “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” Martin Luther King Jr.
Our problem?
How long THIS particular segment of that universal arc will be.
These people, these forces ALWAYS go down, eventually.
Is it going to be soon?
Now?
Or will we let the opportunity slip from our grasp and await the NEXT extension of this inevitable arc?
A bigger, more violent extension.
A world-wide effort.
The REAL W. W. III.
With us as the bad guys.
It all hangs in the balance now.
Do all you can, and await the judgement.
We shall see…
AG
You know this reminds me of a very old story involving Edward R. Murrow and President FDR.
Somehow Murrow learned of the D-Day invasion and he was up at a White House dinner or event and FDR pulls him over and says hey I know you know about D-Day, I know you want to run a piece on it, and I can’t stop you if you do. But for the sake of the nation, I’m asking you not to do it.
FDR didn’t have to sic any goons on him or anything else, because Murrow (like most of the USA) was ALREADY ON BOARD with the plan. Everyone from age 5 to 95 already knew what the “noble cause” was that soldiers were dying for.
Compare it to this debacle when I’m not sure if Frist or Mehlman could rattle out the noble cause we’re all supposedly fighting for.
Pax
When the ‘noble cause’ isn’t the same for everyone, then some will take it under the radar to avoid detection
The journalists, authors and ‘historians’ are often the same people later on as were involved in the controversies. How do we know who to believe when and which versions are legitimate when it comes from those sources?
The other point is, the Iran-Contra affair never ended, did it?
They may imprison a few good investigative journalists, but more will rise up to take their place. It would be different if Bush’s approval was still above 50%. It would be different if even one Bush initiative had turned out to be something other than complete disasters. It would be different if Republican congressmen could run winning campaigns this year without distancing themselves from the President.
There is too much negative information getting out to contain all of the damage, and too much blood in the water already to prevent a feeding frenzy. Stifling journalists and congressmen is the Bushies last gasp at avoiding criminal responsibility for their mismanagement. There is no reason to expect the administration to manage this any better than all of their other crisis issues.
What about the 35%-45% that think it’s acceptable? Part of the reason we have this problem is the acceptance of world dominance at any cost. That doesn’t go away. It sticks around and writes a different version of history that’s used later as accepted facts.
35% is way too high. It’s probably more like 5% who would go along with anything. Most of the people who still support Bush would prefer to let others do their political thinking. They support the President as long as it doesn’t interfere with their real lives. These are not people you can turn to as a core of supporters to impose fascism.
At this point, I would say there are at least twice as many Americans who despise Bush as there are those who still adore him so much they would go along with anything. It’s even easier to find people who hate him here in rural Alabama than people who love him, which is saying something.
Whenever I talk with someone about Bush, they generally say something like “he’s a good president but I don’t trust him on blah blah blah.” Even most of his supporters are mad at him about something (Katrina and ports, mostly). Bush is finally losing the PR war, and it’s steadily getting worse for him. If he had tried a crackdown on journalists 3 years ago he might have gotten away with it, but it’s too late now.
Bush is interchangeable with any one of a hundred others. I’m talking about the architects and other powers behind the scenes. Those are the ones who have been calling the shots for the shadowed foreign policy in the last 30 years. The people in AEI, AIPAC or any of the conservative-religious think tanks are the ones with journalistic powers. I would say 40% is fair as to who they represent, or propose to represent when using their influence.
I’ll say it again….what we are seeing is a continuation of the Iran-contra scandal. It wasn’t stopped before but this time they are also in nearly absolute power.
They still need to hold the Presidency to take absolute power, and this President has no credibility left. I agree with you on the larger long-term problem, and it isn’t going away just because one administration collapses. This country has shifted significantly to the right during my lifetime, and that has to change if we ultimately hope to stop the deterioration of rights.
40% is a fair estimate for the people they claim to represent, but the vast majority of those are followers. Figuring out a way to lure away the controlled mob is probably the key to stopping the slide. For the most part, these aren’t bad people. There has to be some way to reach them.
They still need to hold the Presidency to take absolute power, and this President has no credibility left.
I don’t see anyone mounting an effective challenge or opposition to the abuse of power we’ve witnessed.