Gadfly is Marty Aussenberg, a columnist for the weekly Memphis Flyer. Marty is a former SEC enforcement official, currently in private law practice in Memphis, Tennessee. (A full bio is below the fold.) Cross-posted at The Memphis Flyer.
The latest gift Republicans have given Democrats in this, an election year, is the Senate Intelligence Committee’s refusal to initiate an investigation of the secret, warrantless NSA spying fiasco. I say “gift” because, in spite of their fecklessness in standing up to Republican domination of all three branches of government, the fact is the GOP is playing right into the Democrats’ hands (if only that were truly the Democrats’ tactic). On issue after issue, from the “Phase II” investigation of the intelligence failures leading up to the war in Iraq (which Pat Roberts, the chair of the intelligence committee has been promising for nearly two years, per Raw Story) to investigations of Abu Ghraib, secret prisons, torture, Katrina, congressional ethics, oil company gouging, etc., the Republicans, including the president, have stonewalled and obstructed, because, quite simply, they can.
But the Democrats need to be careful not to bray too loudly about the Republicans’ cover-ups (e.g., Glenn Greenwald) lest the party in power take their protestations seriously, and actually appear to do something of an investigative nature with regard to so many of their, and their fearless leaders’, screw-ups. The Dem’s are far better off, politically, with a party that refuses to hold anyone accountable for the vast and far-reaching excesses and serial incompetence of the government they control than they would be with sham investigations which would end up being nothing more than window dressing anyway. What use would another Republican-led congressional “investigation” be, given that party’s reluctance to swear witnesses who testify before it, or to issue subpoenas to recalcitrant administration minions, as has been the case with so many prior investigations, and given the Democrats’ status as eunuchs on any investigating committee anyway. The failure to investigate, however, gives Democrats a powerful stump theme, both in the upcoming mid-term elections and in the ’08 presidential contest. Not only, they can say, are the Republicans responsible for a “culture of corruption,” they are also responsible for a culture of deceit and obfuscation.
The reality is that with the hegemony enjoyed by the Republicans, nothing meaningful would be likely to come of any investigations anyway. The only time congressional investigations have meant anything was when the parties shared power. The prime example of that, of course, is during Watergate, when the investigation that revealed so many crucial facts about the Nixon White House came as a result of the Democrats’ control of Congress. That and the fact that there were Republicans who were willing to jump on the “get Nixon” bandwagon (a “do-right” philosophy that is completely absent from the current crop of kowtowing Republicans), resulted in an investigation that actually accomplished something (most notably, the revelation of the Nixon tapes). The Democrats should hope that the Dubai ports deal doesn’t completely wake the Republicans from their robotic obeisance to their leader, or at least that it doesn’t translate into party defections on other issues (as it seems unlikely to, given the party line vote on the NSA investigation question).
The Democrats need to keep their powder dry for when it will count—the upcoming elections. In the meantime, and as I’ve predicted before, (Memphis Flyer) the only meaningful accountability this administration is likely to suffer will be at the hands of the federal judiciary which, as we speak, is handling lawsuits covering virtually every Bush/Republican excess, from the NSA debacle, (ACLU ), to prisoner abuse/torture, (ACLU) to Katrina (USA Today). I’m still holding out hope that Henry Whittington will realize he’s a lawyer, not a priest, and change his apology for getting in the way of Cheney’s shotgun into a big fat personal injury suit, since that too is the only way we’ll ever find out what really happened that fateful day on the real-life Ponderosa.
Mr. Aussenberg is an attorney practicing in his own firm in Memphis, Tennessee. He began his career in the private practice of law in Memphis after relocating from Washington, D.C., where he spent five years at the Securities and Exchange Commission as a Special Counsel and Trial Attorney in its Enforcement Division, during which time he handled or supervised the investigation and litigation of several significant cases involving insider trading, market manipulation, and management fraud. Prior to his stint at the S.E.C., he was an Assistant Attorney General with the Pennsylvania Department of Banking in Philadelphia and was the Attorney-In-Charge of Litigation for the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, where, in addition to representing that agency in numerous state trial and appellate courts, he successfully prosecuted the first case of criminal securities fraud in the state’s history.
Mr. Aussenberg’s private practice has focused primarily on investment, financial, corporate and business counseling, litigation and arbitration and regulatory proceedings. He has represented individual, institutional and governmental investors, as well as brokerage firms and individual brokers, in securities and commodities-related matters, S.E.C., NASD and state securities regulatory proceedings, and has represented parties in shareholder derivative, class action and multi-district litigation, as well as defending parties in securities, commodities, and other “white-collar” criminal cases.
Mr. Aussenberg received his J.D. degree from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, and his B.A. degree in Honors Political Science from the University of Pittsburgh. Immediately following law school, he served as a Reginald Heber Smith Community Lawyer Fellow with the Delaware County Legal Assistance Association in Chester, Pennsylvania.
He is admitted to practice in Tennessee, Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia, before the United States Supreme Court, the Third and Sixth Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the United States Tax Court, as well as federal district courts in Tennessee, Arkansas, Mississippi and Louisiana. He is an arbitrator for the NASD, New York Stock Exchange and American Arbitration Association, has published articles (“Stockbroker Fraud: This Kind of Churning Doesn’t Make Butter”, Journal of the Tennessee Society of C.P.A.’s,; Newsletter of the Arkansas Society of C.P.A.’s; Hoosier Banker (Indiana Bankers Association), and been a featured speaker on a variety of topics at seminars in the United States and Canada, including: Municipal Treasurers Association of the United States and Canada, Ottawa, Canada; Government Finance Officers Association; National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, Washington, D.C. ; Tennessee Society of Certified Public Accountants, Memphis, TN; Tennessee Association of Public Accountants, Memphis, TN (1993)
Mr. Aussenberg has two children, a daughter who is a graduate of Columbia University and holds a Masters in Public Health from Johns Hopkins University and is currently a student at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, and a son who is a graduate of Brown University and is working with a conservation organization in Marin County, California while he decides what to do with the rest of his life.
Mr. Aussenberg is an avid golfer whose only handicap is his game, an occasional trap shooter whose best competitive score was a 92, and an even less frequent jazz drummer.
Don’t know if it was your intent, but you just pointed out that there are no differences between today’s dems and repubs!
unfortunate, but that’s the perception-repubcrats-and keeping our powders dry feeds into it.
If this is the rationalization to keep electing do-nothings, then a third-party is the only way to go!
The coast-along-until-the-midterms is a bunch of crap!
“keep their powder dry”…oh yeah, that’s been a particularly successful strategy to date. In other words, let’s don’t stand up for anything and hope the R’s/misAdministration self-destructs in the next eight months. Wouldn’t want to risk having to really change the ethics rules or campaign financing or lobbying laws. Certainly don’t want to investigate anything that might draw attention to the ongoing desecration of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights…might have to make promises we can’t keep…might give the R’s an edge…wouldn’t be good for business.
Democrat is becoming synonymous with loser…still drawing those six figure salaries and millions in perks…beats working for a living. Hey! We’re trying, we just don’t have the power…<much sobbing and wringing of hands>. Spare me the condescension.
As for Henry finding god, there’s an old saying in Texas: Wish in one hand, shit in the other and see which one fills up first.
The federal judiciary is not going to fix this. That’s the job of Congress, not the courts. These people have no respect for the law and they have proven it over and over.
This is, beyond a doubt, the most absurd rationalization I’ve seen here re: the DLC position. The least you could do is share whatever hallucinogens you’ve obviously been taking.
Peace
Thanks–I was wondering if it was just me!
Faux Dem Joe Klein could have written this.
While it is true that the likelihood of the Repubs at the top of the heap ever being held criminally accountable for their actions is virtually zero, if the Dems don’t start speaking out forcefully and unambiguously on principle, if they don’t start really embarassing and shaming the Repubs for their assaults on democracy and the middle class and everyone else then the GOP “steamroller of bullshit” will flatten them again and again.
Keeping one’s powder dry while the opposition self-destructs is often a wise course, but when adopting such a tactic it’s incumbent upon those who wait to be able to load fast and often once the time comes and to shoot with unerring accuracy. Sadly, the Dems under their current leadership have failed conspicuously to demonstrate either of these talents.
I don’t get the keep the powder dry theory, as the dems do nothing but cave in to gwb. W/actions like that, there is not a damn bit of difference between the 2.
The “keeping the powder dry” thing would make some sense if there was an indication that the Dems had some “powder” in the first place and were willing to use it. But, there seems little if any evidence of that.
My take on it is more like the Democrats should not be leading the push for ‘reform’ and more or less show BushCo a way out. That would be a mistake since the repubs would then, when it’s shown ‘reform’ might be a popular thing, the repubs would steal the issue as they’ve done so often before.
Of course, the repubs for once taking real advice from the dems might be a good thing. What is for certain though, repubs trying to execute dems’ policies would, as always, turn out a disaster.
That doesn’t mean the dems should spare any powder. It’s just that I think they should use that powder more to hammer it home why and whose blame it is the US now is in such a precarious situation.
They can show him the way out–its called impeachment! Keep pushing for it! And veto any legislation that his cronies want. Simple as that. And I don’t want to heat that the dems are a minority party–the repubs are also running for re-election.
I don’t think my point came across. It’s not that the Democrats should be totally acquiescent. It’s just that there’s no point in trying to work within the system when the system is totally rigged. The effort would be totally masturbatory (as it’s already been).
Do you really think that even if the Senate Intelligence Committee had agreed to investigate the NSA spying deal, anything would have come out of it, other than more softball questions by the Repub’s on the committee, and more preening, self-satisfied rhetoric by the Democrat poseurs on the committee. What good, for example, did the hearing Specter convened do, at which Abu Gonzales appeared (UNSWORN) and lied through his teeth?
The Democrats can, if they want to, engage in opposition, and demands for “accountability” all they want, but the fact remains it’s strictly therapeutic (if that). Until and unless the balance of power shifts, that will remain the case, which is why I’m advocating that they use their ammo where it will do them the most good—not against the Repug’s (who seem to be bullet proof), but to rally voters.
That doesn’t make any sense either.
WOW!- I guess that there are alot more of us folks out here that are getting quite pissed of with this kinda thinking. ENUF! This is just what the gopers want us to do. WAIT!
Really, I think that we should wait until 2025 so that we can really see just how well the bush plans have improved all of our lives. We are obviously way too close to the beginning to see just how great everything is going to be if we can only find it within ourselves to put our faith in this pres.
bullshite.
If we’re still alive in 2025, that is! Seriously, who knows if that nutcase will push the button?
Keep their powder dry! They don’t even have any powder!
Jeez. I guess the advice is not to stand for anything until there is no political risk.
Grinding my teeth!