Remember that picture of the guy in Abu Ghraib standing hooded on a box with electical wires attached to him? That picture has turned out to be every bit as symbolic of the US war against the Iraqis as the picture of the girl with napalm burns running down the middle of a road in Vietnam was symbolic of a previous generation’s genocidal war of choice. Now we have that man’s story, and as you can see, the human face of the once hooded man:
There is the mangled hand, an old injury that became infected by the shackles chafing his skin. There is the slight limp, made worse by days tied in uncomfortable positions. And most of all, there are the nightmares of his nearly six-month ordeal at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003 and 2004.
Mr. Qaissi, 43, was prisoner 151716 of Cellblock 1A. The picture of him standing hooded atop a cardboard box, attached to electrical wires with his arms stretched wide in an eerily prophetic pose, became the indelible symbol of the torture at Abu Ghraib, west of Baghdad.
[…]
“I never wanted to be famous, especially not in this way,” he said, as he sat in a squalid office rented by his friends here in Amman. That said, he is now a prisoner advocate who clearly understands the power of the image: it appears on his business card.
[…]
But prison records from the Coalition Provisional Authority, which governed Iraq after the invasion, made available to reporters by Amnesty International, show that Mr. Qaissi was in American custody at the time. Beyond that, researchers with both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International say they have interviewed Mr. Qaissi and, along with lawyers suing military contractors in a class-action suit over the abuse, believe that he is the man in the photograph.
Under the government of Saddam Hussein, Mr. Qaissi was a mukhtar, in effect a neighborhood mayor, a role typically given to members of the ruling Baath Party and closely tied to its nebulous security services. After the fall of the government, he managed a parking lot belonging to a mosque in Baghdad.
He was arrested in October 2003, he said, because he loudly complained to the military, human rights organizations and the news media about soldiers’ dumping garbage on a local soccer field. But some of his comments suggest that he is at least sympathetic toward insurgents who fight American soldiers.
“Resistance is an international right,” he said.
Weeks after complaining about the garbage, he said, he was surrounded by Humvees, hooded, tied up and carted to a nearby base before being transferred to Abu Ghraib. Then the questioning began.
“They blamed me for attacking US forces,” he said, “but I said I was handicapped; how could I fire a rifle?” he said, pointing to his hand. “Then he asked me, ‘Where is Osama bin Laden?’ And I answered, ‘Afghanistan.’ “
How did he know? “Because I heard it on TV,” he replied.
He said it soon became evident that the goal was to coax him to divulge names of people who might be connected to attacks on American forces. His hand, then bandaged, was often the focus of threats and inducements, he said, with interrogators offering to fix it or to squash it at different times. After successive interrogations, he said he was finally given a firm warning: “If you don’t speak, next time, we’ll send you to a place where even dogs don’t live.”
Finally, he said, he was taken to a truck, placed face down, restrained and taken to a special section of the prison where he heard shouts and screams. He was forced to strip off all his clothes, then tied with his hands up high. A guard began writing on his chest and forehead, what someone later read to him as, “Colin Powell.”
In all, there were about 100 cells in the cellblock, he said, with prisoners of all ages, from teenagers to old men. Interrogators were often dressed in civilian clothing, their identities strictly shielded.
The prisoners were sleep deprived, he said, and the punishments they faced ranged from bizarre to lewd: an elderly man was forced to wear a bra and pose; a youth was told to hit the other adults; and groups of men were organized in piles. There was the dreaded “music party,” he said, in which prisoners were placed before loudspeakers. Mr. Qaissi also said he had been urinated on by a guard. Then there were the pictures.
“Every soldier seemed to have a camera,” he said. “They used to bring us pictures and threaten to deliver them to our families”
Today, those photographs, turned into montages and slideshows on Mr. Qaissi’s computer, are stark reminders of his experiences in the cellblock. As he scanned through the pictures, each one still instilling shock as it popped on the screen, he would occasionally stop, his voice breaking as he recounted the story behind each photograph.
In one, a young man shudders in fear as a dog menaces him.
“That’s Talib,” he said. “He was a young Yemeni, a student of the Beaux-Arts School in Baghdad, and was really shaken.”
In another, Pfc. Lynndie R. England, who was convicted last September of conspiracy and maltreatment of Iraqi prisoners, poses in front of a line of naked men, a cigarette in her mouth. “That’s Jalil, Khalil and Abu Khattab,” he said. “They’re all brothers, and they’re from my neighborhood.”
Then there is the picture of Mr. Qaissi himself, standing atop a cardboard box, taken 15 days into his detention. He said he had only recently been given a blanket after remaining naked for days, and had fashioned the blanket into a kind of poncho.
The guards took him to a heavy box filled with military meal packs, he said, and hooded him. He was told to stand atop the box as electric wires were attached to either hand. Then, he claims, they shocked him five times, enough for him to bite his tongue.
[…]
After almost six months in Abu Ghraib, Mr. Qaissi said, he was loaded onto a truck, this time without any shackles, but still hooded. As the truck sped out of the prison, another man removed the hood and announced that they had been freed.
With a thick shock of gray hair and melancholy eyes, Mr. Qaissi is today a self-styled activist for prisoners’ rights in Iraq. Shortly after being released from Abu Ghraib in 2004, he started the Association of Victims of American Occupation Prisons with several other men immortalized in the Abu Ghraib pictures.
Financed partly by Arab nongovernmental organizations and private donations, the group’s aim is to publicize the cases of prisoners still in custody, and to support prisoners and their families with donations of clothing and food.
Mr. Qaissi has traveled the Arab world with his computer slideshows and presentations, delivering a message that prisoner abuse by Americans and their Iraqi allies continues. He says that as the public face of his movement, he risks retribution from Shiite militias that have entered the Iraqi police forces and have been implicated in prisoner abuse. But that has not stopped him.
Last week, he said, he lectured at the American University in Beirut, on Monday he drove to Damascus to talk to students and officials, and in a few weeks he heads to Libya for more of the same.
Great diary!!! I wonder if MSNBC will cover … oh wait.. nevermind they don’t do “news”. None of our “free press” does.
My heart aches for that man.
I was actually amazed that New Pravda (NYT – for those unfamiliar with my slang) covered the story at all – I am guessing that it was appropriately buried so that most readers would miss it, and they could go on deluding themselves into believing that they are still a newspaper and not merely a venue for official state propaganda.
Not that I’m cynical or anything. π
I have no idea really what the media is doing or not much anymore. My husband sometimes has the boob tube on in the am for hockey scores and weather and sometimes I’ll blow a gasket about the “news” item of de jour.
I don’t read anymore print news and have sent them all reasons why.
I now, thanks to Susanhu, subscribe to Mother Jones. I also get Rolling Stones (don’t laugh, they are getting good – just did a scathing report on Sen Brownback) and Sierra Club mags. And I try to catch Goodman on Democracy Now.
As a family we picked out what we were going to donate to and subscribe/support to.
We picked Amnesty Intl, HSUS, Sierra Club (Danni had a teacher who was very instrumental in trying to teach the kids about the planet and gave them all al SC Endangered Specials book for xmas one year and Dan and her dad go hiking all the time.)
Plus we scrutinize what we bring into our home and how we live. We’re trying.
Susanhu definitely has good taste in magazines!
As for Rolling Stone, I’ve got it as a gift subscription…and I’ve actually been pleasantly surprised (the Brownback article definitely caught my eye!).
Otherwise, we’re doing what we can to live better lives – no credit cards, consuming less, etc.
One day at a time. π
RS publishes a lot of good articles. I’ve got a Truthout reprint in another window right now: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/031506E.shtml
In These Times is one you might want to peruse sometime. Washington Report for, oddly, Mid East issues.
In addition to Democracy Now, I’m going to pimp Dennis Bernstein & Flashpoints Radio again, available for listening on their site. Outstanding progressive news & interviews. They announced the Chicago protests in advance, fer instance.
I so admire your energy & activism, Janet! Your tale in the Badges diary gave me shivers.
Thanks for the links Arcturus, I especially like reading the diaries you have shared here.
Truthout rocks π
someone accused me of anger.
If you’re not angry you’re not paying attention – or something to that effect.
I have to really work on finding the fine line between outrage and empowerment to keep trying to move forward.
The hate and anger can consume you and put you into dispair… but I don’t think it’s such a bad thing. My anger at torture and bloodied kids. Who wouldn’t be angry over that? But it also can be used to spur me on to get out there in the rain, in front of ACK policemen and wear pink. And sometimes it helps me to… share with friends.
Xoxox
The legendary saxophonist Archie Shepp was once asked about the angry tone of his music, in the process inquiring if there was a lot of hate in his music, and he responded “I cannot go to work with hate in my heart”. He then went on to go into how the anger that characterized his music grew out of a sense of love and desire for justice.
That’s generally my whole vibe: hate is poison, it destroys. Anger, if coming from a place of love can potentially be productive. π
Hate /Anger… Thank you!!!! I like that! As I go back to thinking of protest signs for CP π
Here’s a clip of something I wrote right around Christmas time:
“Love is fundamental to art. I can’t go to work with hate in my heart. I go to work with love in my heart. But love can express itself in bitterness and rage. That’s only an aspect of love.”
That I think sums up my own work, whether it’s in the classroom, in poetry, my professional writing, or when it comes to blogging. Friends and acquaintances have referred to my poetry as dark – sometimes gloomy, sometimes angry. The same is said about my sense of humor, and again the same could be said about what I do here in my little corner of blogtopia. Know that the anger that can periodically jump out at you has its foundations in love: for my family, my country, my planet, my faith, etc. I sincerely doubt I could create – whether in an off-the-cuff blog remark or something more substantive such as a scientific paper – with hate in my heart. Hate destroys. There’s no need to go there. And love in all its forms, is everywhere to be found.
Why “Colin Powell” ?
Is this a reflection of the Neocons’ disappointment with Powell’s refusal to jump on their bandwagon lately ?
I had wished from the depth of my heart that he would speak out against the administration, telling all he knows about the run up to war, but I have given up.
If Powell is this hated by the military, maybe I should cut him some slack.
I gave up on him finding his conscience when he parted ways with Wilkerson. Guess he’ll always be the loyal soldier, unwilling to publicly criticize the command.
JB. Went to non-violence lecture this evening by the author of “A Force More Powerful.” He discussed the Polish Solidarity movement a bit, in the context of the entire non-violent power talk. Thought of you. I am now definitely a believer that these ideas have the power to break this corporate oligarchy. I mean it when I say this. They govern with our consent. Period. It may take time. But I believe change can happen. Wild change. For the better.
Boston Joe, I’m not sure if you saw my diary, Effective Counter Attack; Consideration or Implosion?, on the nonviolent struggle info, basically it’s the first chapter of Helvey’s book. I intend to do a sequel(s) soon.
There were many great comments and I learned quite a lot from them too.
Thanks for the nice card and recent email.
I am a patient man. π
Wish I coulda been there for that talk.