[Promoted from the diaries by Steven D, with minor edits.]
It is hard not to make the connection, to look away from the militarism that increasingly smothers our culture and the ascendancy of far-right wing religious movements who advocate harsh judgement and an unforgiving assertion of Old Testament punishment. Slowly, more and more people, even those on the right, are starting to see this trend too, people like Kevin Phillips:
“Conservative true believers will scoff: the United States is sue generis, they say, a unique and chosen nation,” writes Phillips. “What did or did not happen to Rome, imperial Spain, the Dutch Republic, and Britain is irrelevant. The catch here, alas, is that these nations also thought they were unique and that God was on their side. The revelation that He was apparently not added a further debilitating note to the later stages of each national decline.”
Under George W. Bush, this messianic view of our nation was coupled with belligerence and bald-face, arrogant assertions of raw, naked military muscle.
There had been hopes in some quarters that there would be a “peace dividend” when the Cold War finally ended. Unfortunately, the Republican Party, slightly more entwined with the defense industries than the Democrats (though not by much), were increasingly making common cause with the far right religious movements in Evangelicalism and Catholicism, feeding off of anti-communist rhetoric and stoking the fires of civil culture war. Chalmers Johnson, in an interview with Tom Engelhardt:
The Soviet Union imploded. I thought: What an incredible vindication for the United States. Now it’s over, and the time has come for a real victory dividend, a genuine peace dividend. The question was: Would the U.S. behave as it had in the past when big wars came to an end? We disarmed so rapidly after World War II. Granted, in 1947 we started to rearm very rapidly, but by then our military was farcical. In 1989, what startled me almost more than the Wall coming down was this: As the entire justification for the Military-Industrial Complex, for the Pentagon apparatus, for the fleets around the world, for all our bases came to an end, the United States instantly – pure knee-jerk reaction – began to seek an alternative enemy. Our leaders simply could not contemplate dismantling the apparatus of the Cold War.
That was, I thought, shocking. I was no less shocked that the American public seemed indifferent. And what things they did do were disastrous. George Bush, the father, was President. He instantaneously declared that he was no longer interested in Afghanistan. It’s over. What a huge cost we’ve paid for that, for creating the largest clandestine operation we ever had and then just walking away, so that any Afghan we recruited in the 1980s in the fight against the Soviet Union instantaneously came to see us as the enemy – and started paying us back. The biggest blowback of the lot was, of course, 9/11, but there were plenty of them before then.
And now it’s all connected. Our new enemy just happen to be adherents of a religion that Christianity fought in the past. It was just a slip of the tongue that President Bush described our Global War on Terror as a “crusade”. The General put in charge of pursuing Osama bin Laden just happened to be a evangelical wingnut.
This culture, our political leaders, our church leaders, our media … there can be little or no talk of diplomacy, of second chances, of real communication or admissions of error. Anyone who suggests such things is accused of a lack of patriotism, a lack of faith (increasingly flipsides of the same bloody coin), of many things up to and including treason. There is less and less talk of taking care of our poor, of spending our money wisely … especially since there will be no future after the Second Coming, and since the US is doing God’s work:
Dobbs: Former Republican Party strategist Kevin Phillips joins us here tonight. His new book is called “American Theocracy.” It is a provocative indictment of the administration’s foreign and economic policy, and examines, among other things, how the religious right is driving this administration’s policy. Kevin, it is going good to have you with us.
Phillips: Ah. 1969 is when it was published. It started before the election. But what’s happened to the Republican coalition in the last 10 years especially is it’s been moved more and more towards religious yardsticks. People who go to church. People who favor religion defining government. People who have just a whole set of concerns that go beyond economics.
One of the reasons I think we have kind of screwed up economic politician in some ways is that a lot of Americans have stopped worrying about the economy because they’re waiting for the second coming.
Dobbs: And you mean this quite literally?
Phillips: I mean it quite literally.
Chris Hedges, author of WAR IS A FORCE THAT GIVES US MEANING, said in an interview on PBS’s Religion & Ethics Newsweekly:
I had a great ethics professor at Harvard Divinity School, James Luther Adams. When I was a student, he was in his seventies. He told us that when we were his age, we’d all be fighting the Christian fascists, which we thought was rather silly then, but probably not so silly now.
Fundamentalism lends itself completely to war, because it has a dichotomy between “us” and “them.” There is a notion that the only way to salvation is through whatever religion we happen to be, and in the fervor of that kind of fundamentalism, we refuse to acknowledge that salvation is possible through any other route. In a time of national distress, people always look for those who promise what appear to be black-and-white answers, or clear-cut solutions to the confusion around them.
One of the most important things to remember about war is that it entails a loss of control. Suddenly, you can’t control your environment. You search for those forces that you think can help you regain control, and fundamentalists promise the direct and divine intervention of God — whatever god that happens to be — on behalf of his chosen people — whatever chosen people that happens to be.
This is a culture war, and reason and decency are losing. There is no Prince of Peace, but only a warrior God, bloody on the Cross.
xposted from Liberal Street Fighter
Always look forward to reading your diaries, Madman, and this one is no exception. You’ve drawn on some compelling material there and put it together in a cogent, if graphic way that really puts the whole issue into focus.
Perhaps the auto da fe is not such a relic now, with Abu Gonzales at the AG helm.
…to take one nitpicky exception to your description of Kevin Phillips. He’s really not a rightwinger anymore, and had started moving away from that point of view as early as the mid-’80s when he wrote Staying on Top: The Business Case for a National Industrial Strategy.
Here’s an excerpt from Leonard Silk’s 1984 review in The New York Times that speaks to my point.
Just one minor exception to your exception – Kevin Phillips was never a “rightwinger” in the currently accepted sense of the term. He was a Republican before that party was taken over by the Christian right and now he’s apparently registered as an Independent in Connecticut.
I call him right wing on purpose.
He’s still, as far as I can tell, part of the tiny-government-pro-corporate-libertarian right wing. I don’t necessarily think that is bad. I think my father ended up there toward the end of his life. I think one can be on the right and still be rational, still have basic reasonable ideas about where the country should go, still be able to practice genuine politics and hammer out compromise as part of the process. Guys like Phillips and Bruce Bartlett both thought that the party could put the rabid dogs running this nation in harness to pull the Republican sled (Phillips helped lure them in with big chunks of juicy red steak). Instead, they infected the whole team and now the sled is careening toward a cliff. Props to them for realizing the danger (and Phillips realized it earlier than many of his fellows). I welcome them to the battle to save the fruits of our enlightenment-based government.
BUT …
It’s important to remember where they are politically. It’s offensive that the only critics of Bush who seem to get a fair hearing in the media are rightwing Republicans. To pretend that they aren’t on the right is to help lock in so much of the damage cause by Reagan, the Bushes and Clinton as somehow normative, and I’m not willing to do it.
I can respect people who believe in a more rational version of the right’s worldview. Doesn’t mean they’re not on the right.
He’s still, as far as I can tell, part of the tiny-government-pro-corporate-libertarian right wing.
the Easter Bunny.
I don’t know. I’ve read most of his books including Wealth and Democracy, I regularly watched Bill Moyer’s program NOW where Kevin Phillips was a regular commentator. I’m pretty sure that Libertarians would denounce Phillips as a communist pinko. I cannot imagine why you see him as ‘pro-corporate’. I read something like this over on DK where it made me nuts too.
This is a guy who has been talking about the wealth gap and it’s deleterious effect on our culture and politics for, well, decades. There is no better advocate for the poor in this country. That Lou Dobbs described him as a ‘Republican strategist’ is ridiculous. The fact of the matter is that kevin Phillips is considerably further to the left of most Democrat politicians. I wish to God someone would hire him as a strategist; we might win a goddamed election.
I could be completely off base on him. I’m going off of a couple of interviews and “The Emerging Republican Majority”, the book he wrote that helped the Republicans take over.
He advised Nixon on economic strategies and politics. From what I’ve understood from interviews he’s given, and articles I’ve read, he would advocate more aggressive corporate governance and other civil mechanisms to alleviate the gap between the rich and the poor, rather than government programs to aid the poor. That is a conservative/right idea. There is a long and noble tradition to that political philosophy. He is not, however, a liberal, and the website for American Dynasty describes him:
I meant what I wrote as a description, not an insult. I wish desperately that his brand of conservatism was still running the Republican party.
I meant what I wrote as a description, not an insult. I wish desperately that his brand of conservatism was still running the Republican party.
I’m a great admirer of Phillips and have been for quite some time. He’s right in there with Bill Moyers and Thom Hartmann in the ‘political and social analysis by Americans I really want to hear’.
Did you hear him when he was on NOW before the present day conservatives forced the ‘retirement’ of Moyers? He sounds more like, well, you, Jerome or the folks DHinMI bans than any conservative, living or dead. But, then, it’s difficult for me to orient myself about what is ‘liberal’ or ‘conservative’ anymore. I mean Nixon was way to the left of Bill Clinton and the DLC on domestic issues. 🙂
I’m excited he’s written this book and excited about the subject matter. Kevin Phillips is an extremely talented strategist and cultural commentator and has never written a bad book. He’s exceptionally intelligent and has been prescient throughout his career. He’s changed a good deal in the 30 years or so since he worked for Nixon and wrote the Emerging Republican Majority. I’m pleased to see that he’s chosen for his subject matter what I consider to be the greatest political threat of our lifetime.
It was interesting during the Q+A session in Cleveland the other day, Bush was asked specifically about Phillip’s book and if Bush thought events in the Middle East foretold the apocalypse. He spoke for five minutes but never did say yes or no.
If he had said no the religious rapturists who have him by the balls would have gone crazy and if he had said yes he would have scared the bejesus out of millions of moderate and sensible Americans who still don’t understand that he indeed does believe this world will be ending soon.
Do you remember that interview Bush did a few years ago (unfortunately I can’t remember what show it was), where the interviewer asked him how he thought history would judge him?
Bush’s response was basically “History? I don’t know, we’ll all be dead.”
It was chilling then and now.
A good article and a correct assessment in may ways. Culture defines us and the Corporate oligarchy knows it and uses it as a tool but we have our own culture and need to recognize and use it in the battle for who we are and who we should be.
interview, I thought I heard Kevin Phillips say that 40% of Americans wer drinking the koolaid. I had thought that it was a smaller percentage – say 11 – 20%. What have you heard or what do you think?
I heard that too. He said 40% believed in the rapture, and 40% of those believed the anti-christ was already on earth. :::::scaaaary::::
I am uncertain as to whether Dickie Poo Cheney or Bush qualifies for the title of the antichrist!
I think 40% might be a wee bit high, but not by much. I think a full third of the populace buys into that worldview. Joe Bageant has written some great stuff on this segment of our population. Remember, the “Left Behind” books sell HUGE amounts of copies, and many of the people who read them don’t look at them as fiction, but rather as some kind of prophecy. There is a reason that Bush’s popularity seems to never go lower than 36%, and I think it’s these people.
Another alarming connection is the power that combines business with religion in subjects like Left Behind. The money behind these book sales are generally think tank or foundation sponsored and the the literature is given away to be used in several ways. Most of the faith based community service programs that come from Evangelicals are based on this line of authors.
It has many characteristics of being a cult.
I think you’re right in the idea that the percentage of immovable base are the ones believing GWB is bringing the Bible to life. Did you notice the name of the immigration-detention program being Endgame?
Duke1676 has compiled an excellent resource of stories on this subject available by clicking here
I had thought these camps would be used to contain dissidents and surplus poor from future cleansing operations encouraged by the success of Operation Crescent Cleansing, but it appears I was wrong.
Unless more camps are in the offing, the fate of dissidents and poor is uncertain.
The best way to see what will happen is to look at the timeline of 1930s Germany. One by one, unfavorable, antisocial or unproductive segments of society are segregated for their benefit and the benefit of the country as a whole….heh, probably a Project Harmony or something.
no, I didn’t catch that! (Who can keep up?!?!)
That is really fuckin’ scary.
That is one of the scariest f*cking things I’ve ever seen–and it’s on a government department official website.
It seems more like something a wingnut would dream up as a Brave New World fantasy.
But this is an official US government policy document!
It’s so sicko that I just have to laugh. All of these inhumane crimes against nature, society, and other people committed “in the name of” decency and “faith” are nothing of the kind.
It’s sad that the people are being so misled and that such injustices are being committed by the worldly powers, but that is the nature of wealth and power in human history.
All these self-righteous ideologues are no different than any other criminal/dupe/sinner since the dawn of time.
Ha ha ha ha ha.
The good news, though, is that God is so righteous and so powerful that his goodness is going to blot out the stain of those who commit transgressions against the poor and the weak. In their ignorance and pride they think they can co-opt God for their own sinful ends. But the Bible says:
Now, add in the parallels of histories in secret societies of political movements and we have the case for the struggle between Children of Light and Sons of Belial.
Promise Keepers, Freemasonry
&
The Illuminatti
The Dead Sea Scrolls
In The War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness(1QM), one of the Dead Sea scrolls, Belial is the leader of the Sons of Darkness:
‘But for corruption thou hast made Belial, an angel of hostility. All his dominions are in darkness, and his purpose is to bring about wickedness and guilt. All the spirits that are associated with him are but angels of destruction.’
The fact that in Judaism Belial claimed to be the Messiah led some 1st centuryChristians to consider him the Antichrist.
The Last Days crowd doesn’t just expect the end of the world, they want it to happen. They are doing everything they can to fulfill the prophecies that will provoke Jesus to come out of the sky and pass judgement. Vanity Fair had an article a couple issues back, interviewed Falwell and Hal Lindsey and they were quite open about their goals. And their belief that George Bush will help them make it happen.
They imagine they have some special relationship with God that is going to profit them and their associates.
But God will lay waste all the plans of the powerful.
Great diary.
As an actor I have learned that when I play a character who does great evil, it is critical that I find the justification for that evil and thoroughly believe that justification. Nearly no one sets out to be bad. They may do bad things — but they must do these things for “good” reasons. And the worse the deed is, the stronger the justification must be.
I think that is why war and religion have always been so closely intertwined.
I think, however, you may have overlooked the role of the other American “god” in the picture — the god that is profit. When one combines religious fervor with the ability to make tons of money, one is left with a potent drug that many will want to swallow.
The recent movie “Why We Fight” takes a long measured look at the profit motive.
Incredible piece Madman.
This letter of mine published in the NYT a scant couple of days before the start of the Iraq invasion in 2003 speaks not specifically to the religious fascism component of Bushco’s drive but more broadly to the hegemonic ambition, the pursuit of empire, and the endemic denial that afflicts those who seek empire, the denial which allows them to think themselves different from all those empire builders that came before them.
Somewhat parallel to the quote you reference from Phillips above where he says; “What did or did not happen to Rome, imperial Spain, the Dutch Republic, and Britain is irrelevant.”; I wrote;
This incredibly self-righteous and self-regarding diary is intentionally blasphemous and offensive to Christians. Madman in the Marketplace is an anti-religious provocateur. It is always his method. I’m infuriated that this gets elevated to a top-level post. This is not reasoned, rational, liberal discourse. This is hate-mongering and bigotry!
I’ve probably read more of Chalmers Johnson than Madman. I agree with much of the substance that underlies this diary.
But the intentional blasphemy is over the top. Madman is a PRICK! This should be deleted.
And if you can’t see why this is blasphemous and intentionally and unreasonably offensive, it’s a shame you didn’t have a better education.
one can only blaspheme if one is a believer.
When the religious stop trying to impose their superstitions on the rest of us using the power of the state, I will happily ignore them.
The REAL blasphemies are religious leaders on the right who ignore the Beatitudes while trumpeting single verses in Leviticus. The REAL blasphemies are religious believers who cheerlead the subjugation of women, minorities and gays while ignoring nearly ALL of the actual four Gospels that tell the story of the Savior they profess to emulate, especially the parables of the Good Samaritan, the Camel and the eye of the needle, the admonition not to judge others, as that job is Someone else’s place in the Great Scheme. The TRAGIC blasphemy is a theocratic political movement that would actively promote war and conflict in the hope of inciting the supposed Endtimes that it apparently wants so desperately.
I will gladly not mock the pious and hypocritical when they themselves actually practice what they preach.
Your response, as usual, is sanctimonious and disingenuous. I see somebody gave me a ‘2’ for my complaint. Nothing like good old leftist anti-religion arguments to build an electoral majority.
Whether or not you “blasphemed,” being not a believer, there can be no argument that you did your best to desecrate Christian symbols in a grandiose effort to draw attention to your unoriginal and routine complaints about the hypocrisy of Republicans.
That’s not original or courageous. That’s simply cheap and discriminatory. You may as well start flying a Confederate battle flag on your sig. It’s the same cheap trick.
i consider myself a devout Christian and wasn’t offended in the least by any of Madman’s piece. Not only that but I look forward to his next piece on the subject.
His last line was: “There is no Prince of Peace, but only a warrior God, bloody on the Cross.”
You read the rest of it.
It is Lent.
You consider yourself a devout Christian.
You weren’t offended in the least by any of his piece.
How can I respond?
Never mind.
There’s a crazy group of so-called Christians from Kansas that are going around the United States protesting at the funerals of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, claiming that God hates the U.S. because the country is tolerant of gay people. They also, by the by, happen to be ferociously anti-Catholic. They showed up at my church in Carroll County, Maryland last week, protesting at the funeral of a Marine who was killed in Iraq. A large crowd of bikers showed up to shield the grieving family from these fanatics. Thinking of that scence, I think Madman is one of the protesters, attacking attacking attacking in a great sense of righteousness. Me, I’m over with the bikers, restraining myself, but really wanting to kick him in the nuts.
go read THIS and then lecture me about blasphemy:
THIS belief is professed by a people that likes to go on and on about how this is a CHRISTIAN NATION.
I agree with you on 95 percent of your complaints. And I’ll bet I do as much or more than you do to protest.
I just don’t single out one particular group to attack, as you do.
So you’ve got a problem with Christianity. Fine. But it’s nuts the way you blame Christians for everything you hate.
You are a bigot!