Confidence is that feeling by which the mind embarks in great and honorable courses with a sure hope and trust in itself. -Cicero
After reading the Sunday papers and watching some of the Sunday morning talk shows, I sense something of a sea change in the national discourse over Iraq. It starts with the administration, never known for admitting mistakes. And yet, Condi Rice finally submitted to reality and recently said:
“I know we’ve made tactical errors, thousands of them I’m sure.”
Even though she backtracked on that comment in a later press conference, its very utterance is indicative of just how hard reality in Iraq is pressing on the Bush regime’s ability to spin events. The situation in Iraq is so bad that Congress and the Establishment media are no longer sugar coating it. Take a look at the New York Times’s unsigned editorial.
Iraq is becoming a country that America should be ashamed to support, let alone occupy. The nation as a whole is sliding closer to open civil war. In its capital, thugs kidnap and torture innocent civilians with impunity, then murder them for their religious beliefs. The rights of women are evaporating. The head of the government is the ally of a radical anti-American cleric who leads a powerful private militia that is behind much of the sectarian terror.
The Bush administration will not acknowledge the desperate situation….
…Unfortunately, after three years of policy blunders in Iraq, Washington may no longer have the political or military capital to prevail.
On CNN, Wolf Blitzer interviewed Chuck Hagel and Evan Bayh. Their criticisms of the Bush administration’s conduct of the war were scathing. Hagel flatly stated that the Iraq was much worse off in every category than it was three years ago. He said that every decision the administration had made since the very beginning of the war had been wrong. Bayh said that, when he was recently in Iraq, he talked to a high level administration official that told him the decision to disband the Iraqi army had been ‘insane’. He also told Bayh that there was no military solution.
They both called on the Iraqi government to form a unity government, but lacking much optimism, said we must be prepared to pull out if a unity government cannot be attained.
It has been over three months since Iraq had their elections. The resulting parliament seems incapable of forming a government. And the result is an open fissure in the Washington cognoscenti’s resolve.
The wheels are coming off the cart for the President. They still have some of their set pieces in the assembly line. They are pushing the immigration issue, the faux war on Christians, and they are pre-positioning propaganda for a potential showdown with Iran. But, they have lost the support of the Washington Establishment (as measured by stalwart centrists like Bayh and Hagel, and the editorial boards of the Washington Post and New York Times) for the war effort in Iraq.
The Washington Post, today, made an effort to support the administration’s hardline on Iran. But their heart isn’t in it.
I think it is finally starting to set-in on the D.C. power brokers that this country cannot afford another three years of the Bush administration. Look to see increased levels of noise from the press and even some Republicans for Cheney and Rumsfeld to step down. And look for the administration to respond with increasing bellicosity toward Iran. Manufacturing an international foreign policy crisis is the only way for the Cheney cabal to get the capitol back on board. Without a need for a public face of unity, the neocons will get chewed up and spit out. That is what it has come to.
They SHOULD be way past the “tipping point” and the NYT should accept responsibility for not being critical much sooner. Still, this regime is at least and maybe more dangerous in it’s dying. The question is; will the Times and other corporate media continue to shill for the repugs as they fan the flames of disaster in Iran or will they turn on them like piranha?
The target for removal is emerging as the veep, and anyone associated with his offices; and of course “Rummy”. But those whispers I think are coming from outside, not inside, the WH. One of the big problems with Congressional oversight since Bush took office, is that members suffer from constant Rove-lag. By the time they get angry/frustrated enough to respond, it’s too late.
The administration/WH may be weak, but you should really check out the numbers for Congress. First time I can remember they are all less trustworthy than Junior Sample’s used-car salesman.
You’re dreaming.
There is no opposition party, unless you count Feingold and Conyers and their tiny band of compatriots as a “party”. It won’t tip over because there is not anyone willing to push it, at least not from a noble POV. Feingold tries, but he’s having to throw off HIS “OWN” FUCKING PARTY, as does Conyers. In fact, if anybody is going to push Bush over, it’s going to be the Nativist and Religious Right, who’re laying the groundwork for a racist demogogue to run for President in just two years.
I understand that you want to keep you hopes up, but the only thing at its “tipping point” is our tattered Republic.
From the Times
For shame.
are less tempted to stand by their principles than those of us who have nothing to lose. The Clintons are a case in point. I happened to really like both Bill AND Hill. But Bill was always more conservative than I would have liked. I did appreciate his ability to understand the word “compromise” even if I didn’t always like the results (welfare reform for example). But it takes ego of a monumental degree to run for high office. And it takes a desire for power far beyond the norm. And it takes pandering to the “likely” voters.
We have got to get serious about campaign finance reform so that we do not have our public servants only servants to those that bought them.
And we have to get serious about voter turnout. Education about the issues, education about what is at stake, and more education about civic responsibility is needed. Support of all kinds for voters needs to be there. Independent fact checkers on campaign ads, independent reports on campaign financing and independent review of the issues is needed. A voter should be able to go to the library, for instance and check his or her status as a registered voter. That voter should also be able to see all the issues and all the candidates on the ballot at least 30 days before the vote along with all the information from the independent sources mentioned above. A voter should be able to log on and request a mail in ballot if he/she will be unable to vote.
the opposition party is the part of the Republican Party and the bipartisan center that is finding itself increasingly empowered as Bush’s war and second term falters.
We’ll see how Josh Bolten reacts. I see Rummy going down. Possibly Chertoff too. But no one will be appeased until both Rummy and Cheney are disempowered.
Wow. Go catch Kevin Phillips’ stirring Op-ed piece in today’s Wapo.
How the GOP Became God’s Own Party
that’s not opposition. It is merely a more reasonable right locking in the death of our Republic, and I don’t think they really appreciate the monster they’ve woken up. It’s going to probably be btwn somebody like Brownback vs somebody like Allen, and just about any of the pathetic centrist losers the party will foist on us will get their ass beaten by either one. Hell, even if they really don’t lose, the Dems have done NOTHING to protect the vote, so if they can’t win, the Republicans will steal.
mangoes, plums, oranges, melons, pears, poison apples, grapes, pomegranates, every kind of fruit.
“So,” asked the voice, “Would you rather have a red apple or a green one?”
Damn DtF, that voice must be going color-blind. A green one? One could only wish. It’s really blue — the voice just won’t acknowledge that it’s a phoney.
…got it half right:
He said that every decision the administration had made since the very beginning of the war had been wrong.
Since well before the beginning of the war, Senator.
The “incompetence” theme is now the mantra of the Republican rats leaving the ship. And of way too many Democrats.
Not that the Bush Administration hasn’t been incompetent in Iraq, and New Orleans and lots of other places.
But we on the left need not to get snared into an it’s-all-about-the-incompetence approach to attacking the Administration. Because the real issue is policy, doctrine, strategy. True, they could have done a better job of pushing their ideology, which is evidence of just how awful they are, but the last thing we need are Democrats saying we could have done this better and not saying we wouldn’t have done this at all.
But to the people who were intended to make money, and are now making quite a lot of it, I bet they seem very competent indeed. ;->
…a lot easier for Halliburton, et al. to disappear a few billions in shrink-wrapped $100s because Iraq was in chaos. But I’m still of the opinion that, had their plans succeeded, the profits would have been even more immense. Not that the plans could have succeeded, but I truly believe the ideologues thought they could.
their plans have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.
And their pathological overcaution, putting return of “casualties” under cover ban, highly publicized trials for Lynndie England, etc. seem to me to indicate that at least some of them have had some unfounded uncertaintly about domestic enthusiasm.
Any little mewls of discontent over details like yellow cake from Niger or listening to telephone conversations can be easily dispensed with by simply having some of the more visible players transitioned to a more “behind the scenes” role, amid a very public show of throwing the malcontents a couple of big fish.
I think BooMan mentioned Cheney and Chertoff, don’t remember if he mentioned Rumsfeld, but he is also an obviousl candidate.
Even Mr. Danger himself can be easily jettisoned. I have always assumed that was the reason behind his placement as figurehead in the first place.
This is the point:
As I’ve said more times than even I want to hear; Even NOW, the Democrats are afraid to say the invasion was a mistake.
While I believe that the neocons grip on power is almost a thing of the past, they are nevertheless still working overtime to instigate an attack on Iran in order to both keep their current place in the power structure and to further their agenda for permanent war in the Middle East (whether they themselves continue to operate the levers of power in DC or not).
I do not believe they’ll succeeed with these additional war plans because, as you point out, they’ve lost too much support in the congress and in the media. But they are still incredibly dangerous, in the same way that a cornered wild boar is dangerous. They’re still capable of inflicting lots more harm, andin light of that we need to not relax our wariness and scrutiny of them for a minute. (I for one believe they are capable of facilitating a significant terror attack here in the US if they believed doing so would advance their insane agenda.)
Also, we should keep in mind that there are plenty of other forces in the GOP that are inimical to the health and well-being of the country besides the neocons. There are the Grover Norquist, Mammon worshipping looters who’ve so successfully removed a couple of trillion dollars from the Treasury; there are the evangelical fascists who seek to impose their arbitrary authoritarian belief structure on the rest of us; and there are the Tancredo/Sensenbrenner xenophobes who would demonize anyone who doesn’t conform to their own ideal of what a person should be.
And, of course, there is the absence of a vital and relevant and functional Democratic Party that actually is different enough from the GOP to represent a meaningful choice for those who see a need for a huge change in direction for the country.
So, the idea that perhaps the spreading of conflict in the Middle East through specific new aggressions by BushCo might be coming to a close is welcomed news, there are still plenty of reasons not to relax our guard for an instant.
…roll the Theo-Rads, the Neo-Cons, the oligarchs and the retrograde ethnocentrists into one neat little bundle. There is some overlap in these groups, and they obviously been allies, to each other’s benefit, but now they are verging on going after each other’s jugulars, a bunch of wild boars. If only enough Democrats would help nudge them along in their disintegration instead of standing silent, or worse, enabling them.
The problem for Bush is that a combination of factors have combined, or are combining, that are separating rank and file Republican’s self-interest from Bush’s self-interest.
Iraq has deteriorated to the point that is threatening the position of every committee chairman, it is threatening regional business interests, and it is destroying the armed forces.
Add to this the near complete alienation of the intelligence community and it is not unlikely that people are beginning to talk quietly about plans such as the following:
Making up a short list of people that might be suitable to fill out the last two years of Bush’s term. Have someone from the House in their preferred candidate’s state resign. Have the governor appoint their preferred candidate to the House. Elect their preferred candidate speaker of the house.
Tell Bush and Cheney that they will open up the floodgates of Congressional oversight unless they resign. Install the Speaker as President. Reappoint the original house member. Re-elect Hastert as speaker.
It really is getting that desperate for certain interests in this country.
I still am very interested to see what Josh Bolten intends to do to head off such moves.
One thing about all these groups is that, because they are authoritarian in nature, they can’t help but turn on each other eventually since no one with megalomaniacal ambition can abide the idea of sharing power for long.
But even the fact that their own ideologies, their own pathologies carries within them the seeds of their own downfall shouldn’t deter us from our vigilant stand against them.
a military spouse. God I would love to get up one morning without that sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach……I would love to go back to listening to the soldiers bitch about “always training and never really doing anything”. I would love to go back to the days of hearing them all whine about funding for this and over funding for that……you know…..the normal whining it seems like we all have to do pertaining to the goofy things we all have to put up with. I feel like I can trust your instincts on this too as you have been able to feel such shifts in the wind before. I’m too close to the storm and all I can feel is wind and my personal fears often misjudge wind and blowhards!
This WH is not big on new people, new thinking, admitting mistakes, or changing course. I suspect you heard Bush’s complete Iraq plan when he said it will be the NEXT guy’s problem. Weather this is because he always planned on staying or had no plan at all is a moot point. He has no intention to leave Iraq or of changing any domestic policy (i.e. tax cuts, deficit spending). This guy has ALWAYS made a mess of things and let somebody else clean it up. Don’t expect him to change now.
So the Republican Congress critters will have to be upset and talk about change, but not a thing is going to happen. They will continue to support this president at every opportunity and hope to make just enough noise to skate through the 2006 midterms although they are just beginning to wonder what that will take.
We will not have a functioning government with real checks and balances until the Congress has a Dem party majority. These Congress critters talk, but they have yet to take one real step to do anything.
Rubberstamp Republican Congress
I cannot even begin to imagine what kind of catastrophe it would take to wake the Republicans in Congress up to doing their job. They have fiddled while Bush has played with matches and burned down much of our country. They need to go.
…about all the rest, I certainly agree with you regarding Mister Bush. There was another facade like him two decades ago, Ronald Reagan. But Reagan could deliver his scripted lines perfectly and had charisma, both missing from the current resident’s arsenal. I fear what would happen if our rulers managed to choose some far rightist with the speech-making, crowd-connecting skills of, say, Bill Clinton.
I’m watching Linsay Graham very carefully. I think he might be the most dangerous person of all in the GOP
He’s smart, he’s clever, he’s an acomplished liar and has proven skills at misdirection, and he’s quite adept at portraying himself as the voice of reason.
If tragedy strikes and McCain gets the GOP nomination, and if he selects Graham as his running mate, the country will be in for so much trouble if they win that it’ll make the Bush regime look almost benign by comparison.
(I don’t know why exactly, but I see Graham as virtually demonic in nature If I believed in Christ as a godhead, I’d think of Graham as the Anti-Christ.)
I wonder if the NYT editorialists thought through what they were saying. The logic of the editorial leads inexorably to a stunning, if unvoiced, conclusion: Iraq was better off under Saddam. The words that must not be spoken finally (almost) see the light. So we are left with:
Iraq was better off with Saddam before the US “liberation”.
There were never WMDs.
There was never any Iraq Sept 11 connection.
The Iraq invasion has not diminished terrorism, but has enabled it to grow vastly more powerful and dangerous.
In other words, there is no longer ANY excuse for the Iraq adventure to have ever started. After every other excuse failed, the war lovers fell back to “democratizing” the ME. Now even the pro-war NYT knocks that final prop away. From here on in, there can be no more justfication of the war as a difference in opinion between honest observers. From here on in, every justification for the war can only be recognized as a conscious lie.
i think this has been the case for a while, but I think the breakdown of the political process in Iraq is putting us a critical point.
Even after all the reasons for the war have debunked or gone up in smoke, there is still that damned Pottery Barn rule and the whole ‘you broke it, you own it’ problem.
If Bush is intent on staying in Iraq for another three years under these circumstances, I don’t think he will be allowed to fill out his term.
No one has done more to elevate the stature and expand the influence of bin Laden than the Bush regime. No one has validated bin Laden’s rhetoric about Western aims in the Middle East than BushCo.
If the Dems would highlight these simple points in their rhetoric as they approach the elctions, it would serve them well, IMHO. Sadly, I doubt they have the courage to stand up this way.
Terror alert status raised to RED!!!
Duck and Cover!!
Vote for us again in NOVEMBER, so we can keep you safe!