.
Jill Carroll forced to partake in U.S. propaganda at Ramstein, Germany before her release to travel to the U.S.? Yesterday Carroll was expected to stopover just 2½ hours in Germany before traveling home.
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, Germany Apr 2, 2006 (ABC/AP)– Protected by the U.S. military and far from the country where she had been held hostage, Jill Carroll strongly disavowed statements she had made during captivity in Iraq and shortly after her release, saying Saturday she had been repeatedly threatened.
In a video, recorded before she was freed and posted by her captors on an Islamist Web site, Carroll spoke out against the U.S. military presence. But in a statement Saturday, she said the recording was made under threat. Her editor has said three men were pointing guns at her at the time.
“During my last night in captivity, my captors forced me to participate in a propaganda video. They told me I would be released if I cooperated. I was living in a threatening environment, under their control, and wanted to go home alive. So I agreed,” she said in a statement read by her editor in Boston.
“Things that I was forced to say while captive are now being taken by some as an accurate reflection of my personal views. They are not.”
28-year-old U.S. journalist Jill Carroll is welcomed by Base Commander, Col. Kurt Lohide after she landed at the U.S. Airbase in Ramstein. (AP)
The 28-year-old journalist a freelancer for the Boston-based Christian Science Monitor was seized Jan. 7 in western Baghdad by gunmen who killed her Iraqi translator. She was dropped off Thursday 82 days later at an office of the Iraqi Islamic Party, a Sunni Arab organization, and later escorted by the U.S. military to the Green Zone, the fortified compound in Baghdad protecting the U.S. embassy and other facilities.
In the statement, Carroll also disavowed an interview she gave to the party shortly after her release. She said the party had promised her the interview would not be aired “and broke their word.”
“At any rate, fearing retribution from my captors, I did not speak freely. Out of fear, I said I wasn’t threatened. In fact, I was threatened many times,” she said. “Also, at least two false statements about me have been widely aired: One that I refused to travel and cooperate with the U.S. military, and two that I refused to discuss my captivity with U.S. officials. Again, neither statement is true.”
The kidnappers, calling themselves the Revenge Brigades, had demanded the release of all female detainees in Iraq by Feb. 26 or Carroll would be killed. U.S. officials did release some female detainees at the time, but said it had nothing to do with the demands.
In the video posted Friday, her abductors said they freed Carroll because “the American government met some of our demands by releasing some of our women from prison.”
Also in the video, she called on President Bush to bring American troops home.
“Tens of thousands … have lost their lives here because of the occupation,” she said in the video. “I think Americans need to think about that and realize day-to-day how difficult life is here.”
She said the insurgents were “only trying to defend their country … to stop an illegal and dangerous and deadly occupation.”
In her statement Saturday, she condemned her captors, although she did not address the war in Iraq.
BAGHDAD (BBC News) 15 minutes ago — US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw have arrived in Baghdad, a British embassy spokesperson has said.
The pair made the unannounced trip after Mr Straw hosted Ms Rice on a two-day visit to north-western England.
The UK embassy said Mr Straw would meet Iraqi politicians but would not comment on Ms Rice’s itinerary.
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
as will Giuliana Sgrena.
Read an AP article about this. My first thought was that this was very similar to Patricia Hearst…I swear, sometimes I don’t know what to believe anymore….
AP
Now I looked at the picture (a profile) w/the link I posted…follow the link and take a good look at her neck, then her face. (Don’t know how to move photos yet, sorry.) Notice the difference in her complexion? Looks like someone may have done a lousy makeup job–didn’t match the skin tones, or put the foundation on her neck…
If they let her outside during her captivity, it could be the result of the Islamic head scarf shading her neck while her face received a slight tan. It could even be left over from before she was captured as in pictures I’ve seen of her from that time she was wearing a scarf.
You could be right. The reason I noticed this was that I have a pale olive skin tone, and have had a difficult time finding a foundation that matched–either looked too pink or too pale, unless I used one that appeared to be too dark for me until I tried it.
Like was said downthread, wait for her book to come out…
I can identify with that problem – except in my case I can never find foundation that’s light enough. I give “paleface” a whole new meaning {g}… Because of that, I quit wearing makeup about 23 years ago and never looked back. You’d be surprised how much can be accomplished in the time usually spent applying that gook – read a chapter in a book, sew a couple seams in a quilt, knit a few rows of a sweater, read a blog or two (I keep some knitting handy for those times as I’m part of the Cloths for Crisis project to provide a handknit washcloth to people in crisis to show them that someone cares).
Also gave it up. Like you said, too many more important things to do!
Time will tell what actually happened to Jill Caroll. No one here has the least inkling of what’s inside her head, nor does the U.S. military (who debriefs every captive), any pundit/blogger/reporter, or even her family. Sorry, but you’ll all have to wait for the book by Caroll, and eventually (ten years on) from her captors.
Anything else is pure speculation.
I have to agree.
I’m a big fan of Oui’s diaries, but I think this one jumps the gun.
I spent a good portion of last night smacking down the cretins at Jeff Goldstein’s blog – where you can read things like this:
That’s from goldstein himself.
Link here
I think Carroll threatens the war-bloggers because she has reported the truth in the past and is in a unique position now to continue doing so.
In terms of the above post, I am willing to go this far out on a limb – I rather doubt that Carroll looks on the kidnappers who held her in captivity for nearly three months and murdered her interpreter and friend with any great degree of kindness.
I never visit the “war-bloggers”, “Pajamaramas”, or chickenhawk websites. The collective knowledge on all of them wouldn’t fill a thimble. Does she look kindly on her captors? I think eventually the answer will be far more complex than “yes” or “no”. The only thing I’m certain of is that she is very glad to be home with her family.
…the answer will be far more complex than “yes” or “no”.
That’s why the wingnuts have trouble wrapping their little minds around it. When you have only one neuron, it can only be “on” or “off,” “black” or “white,” “good” or “evil,” etc…
Oh Oui, it is so good to have you back here posting again..missed you lots.
I am going to be looking forward to her book and recount of this time in her life. thanks again Oui…you are the best…
.
Family and personally we’re doing fine. With close relatives we’ve seen just some health issues and passing away of an in-law that needed our attention and support.
Anyway, I could use a political spring break to get a clear view of recent frog-marches, trying to keep track of the Abramoffs, Cunninghams, DeLays and Scooter Libby: who is in prison and who is out.
I should be posting comments and diaries soon.
This particular diary is on the world list again, due to a recent recommendation that was added!
Thank you all for concern, I missed all of you too.
“But I will not let myself be reduced to silence.”
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY
What a thrill to see your name this morning! Welcome back, my friend.
Hi Oui. Where have you been hiding all this time?!
NOticed that this diary is from April 2nd. You have to teach me this trick :-)!!!!