[promoted by BooMan]
A little later than this time tomorrow evening, George W. Bush – or, as I used to call him before I reacquired my childhood manners, Dubyanocchio – will have 1000 days left to botch, bash and butcher whatever he didn’t get his hands on in the first 1920 days of his term as President. One thousand days to redistribute to his pals what they haven’t already snatched. Keith Olbermann can begin a real countdown.
1000 days.
Cripes. I could, if I wished, begin collecting retirement benefits from Social Security before Mister Bush’s scheduled departure. The very system he tried to shove down the slippery slope to destruction as his first domestic priority in 2002. Before he’s out of the Oval Office, I’ll also be eligible to get into a movie for a 25% discount, which is a good thing because who knows what the Decider’s decisions may do to my family’s income or the economy in general over the next 1000 days.
1000 days. Twenty-four thousand hours. One million, four hundred-forty million minutes. Eight-six million, four hundred-thousand seconds. Tick. Tick. Tick. Sigh.
Those who know me ask, what’s the problem? You lived through Lyndon Johnson’s 1865 days. Richard Nixon’s 2026 days. Ronald Reagan’s 2922 days.
It’s true. I did. And some of those days seemed mighty long. I know it’s hard for many denizens of left wwwLand to believe, but a few of us previously thought we were living in the time of the Worst. President. Ever.
However, despite his murderously inexcusable escalation of a war he and his own advisors didn’t believe could be won. LBJ did some good things. Despite his even worse war policy, the “Southern Strategy,” the assault on the Constitution, Nixon did some good things. Despite his condoning and funding of slaughter in Central America, his duplicitous dealings with Iran, his tax policies, his phony Strategic Defense Initiative and his single-mindedly destroying an energy policy that, if continued, might have meant we wouldn’t be having the urgent discussions – or wars – we are today, yes, despite all this, Reagan did some good things.
So one is driven to ask the obvious question, is Mister Bush saving the good things in his Administration for the next 1000 days? Perhaps.
Maybe tomorrow, although I don’t have his schedule in hand, he will stand up a week before the third anniversary of “Mission Accomplished,” have an epiphany right in front of us and announce that he’s going to do better from now on. No more lying. No more looting. No more pretending. Henceforth, the interests of Americans, first and foremost. Whether it’s better body armor, better levees or the right not to be spied on without due process, he’ll proclaim 1000 days of righteous government by and for the people, with a promise to move toward of the people as well. Perhaps he’ll declare that he’s no longer going to chest-thump in the direction of Iran and initiate face-to-face negotiations instead. Perhaps he’ll tell us how since, Saturday’s commemoration of Earth Day, he’s had a change of heart about global climate change. Perhaps he’ll announce he’s fired Karl Rove.
Uh-huh.
So much for that hallucination.
Mister Bush is wounded now. When his team had total control of the message, all the damage being done, the outlawry, the secrecy, the unconstitutionality, the shamelessness didn’t matter because it was so easily concealed, glossed over, or excused with some tidbit or full-blown campaign of eagerly swallowed disinformation. Now, with the polls punching a hole in what was thought to be the absolute floor of his approval ratings, Mister Bush is a growing liability to his fellow Republicans, as the ever louder muttering is beginning to indicate.
When you have to be extra careful which ex-general you invite to stand next to you, it’s more than just a spot of trouble that will blow over. When the media sycophants, operatives and yellowbellies you once could count on always to tell the story the way you wanted it told are trumped by a handful of real investigators, you’ve got a problem. Faced with new and nasty revelations every other day, you might be tempted to do something dramatic to gain back some ground.
1000 days. Since you’ve started reading this, a few dozen seconds have ticked away. We’re closer to the end now. Tick. Tick. Tick.
Is there any chance of reprieve? My blogmate Kagro X has helped make impeach a household word with his razor-witted campaign. Some pressure is building at local and even state government levels. But, realistically now, am I out of my mind to truly expect that, after a majority-changing November election, we’ll have comprehensive public hearings about the doings of the past six years? That Americans will, upon hearing the evidence, pressure their Representatives to send Mister Bush and some of his colleagues-in-crime up to the Senate for trial? And that, after due consideration of the evidence, enough Senators from both sides of the aisle will send these officials packing? I’m hopeful. But I’m doubtful.
So tell me there’s a chance, please, that there really is a chance that a few hundred thousand minutes can be shaved off Mister Bush’s (and Dick Cheney’s) malignant reign. Tell me that I don’t really have ahead of me another 1000 days of horror, rage and despair, hearing that voice, seeing that face, listening to those lies, wondering whence cometh the next war. Tell me I’m not stuck from now until January 20, 2009, waiting with my fingers crossed, counting tick, tick, tick.
Take the poll. Remember, it’s what you think will happen, not what you want to happen.
I know you promised, but, your use of Mr. Bush still bugs the hell out of me. Can’t you please lose your childhood manners, once in awhile?
If you do, I won’t call gwb an asshole.
How’s that?
I don’t think you can do it 🙂
It would be tough, I admit. But, believe me, I could think of something else! 🙂
So Mr. Kid, if I may call you that: if we shouldn’t support the Dems because too many of them are gutless, what do you propose? Third party candidates or vote Republican to see how really bad things can get?
Third party.
I appreciate your commentary on just how bad this President has been.
I admit, I paid no attention to politics whatsoever (other than voting straight Democrat once every 4 years) until a little over a year ago.
For the past year all I’ve wanted is to get this administration out of office, and hope that I could once again go back to not paying attention; that the stewardship of the country would be held by ones I trusted.
But now I’m beginning to realize I’ll never be able to go back to that blissful state of ignorace. It would be an abdication of my responsibility as a citizen to trust any politician to that extent. Or maybe more accurately, to give them that kind of freedom from oversight.
Now my hope is that this administration will be powerless to further damage the country before their term runs out, and that we will get a President that is committted to fixing the wrongs that have been perpetrated by this administration.
The budget and foreign policy would be damn good places to start the fixin’.
There have been folks on both the Right and the Left that wonder what happens to the liberal blogosphere if/when the Democrats regain a semblance of control in both houses of Congress this year, and possibly the White House in 2008 — do we just pat ourselves on the back and fade into obscurity?
I believe that if that day comes, our work will have just begun — we have to watch our own even closer than we do the opposition, and hold them to a tough standard. No more “business as usual”…
While I was standing for the National Anthem at the last Sharks game of the regular season, I realized that I do still love my country…and I want to be proud of it again. (There’s a diary in there somewhere…)
I believe that if that day comes, our work will have just begun — we have to watch our own even closer than we do the opposition, and hold them to a tough standard. No more “business as usual”…
I don’t believe for one minute that there will be some dems who will get complacent, as too many have already.
We just have to remember that they all work for us. Republican, Democrat, Independent, doesn’t matter. If they’re not doing what is right by their constituency, they’re not doing their job. Period.
I just hope that after the Democrats get back into power (which is a cyclical inevitability if nothing else) the liberal blogosphere doesn’t lose its ability to cross check and verify what our leaders are doing, for better or worse as far as political appearance.
I am still proud of my country at this point (if not our leaders), though my outlook for the future is slightly more pessimistic than it has been in the past. But it gives me hope that we continue to see Bush’s approval ratings drop.
Contrary to what we in the highly informed information superhighway sometimes think, the American populace is not stupid. It is just slow to react. But the battleship is turning. I really feel that now.
We just have to remember that they all work for us.
And, we can’t let them forget it. That is the big thing that we would have to keep working on.
Also, on that note, we are the employers, as Damnit Janet once said–why the hell should our employees have better medical coverage than we do?
(You can tell how strongly I feel about single payer health care.)
…are sticking with the Dems to get rid of the GOP aren’t going to put up with the we-can’t-do-that-it-would-cost-us-votes crowd once Democrats are back in the saddle. We may not cuss as much, but if they think we’re not going to hold their feet to the fire, they’ve got a surprise coming.
Seriously, I have never received an answer to this question: Why vote for an untrustworthy DINO in the hope that things may be different, when the DINO’s past performance strongly suggests otherwise?
I will try to answer.
Please keep in mind, I’m not giving you my opinion…rather, this is what I’ve gathered from reading.
Getting a democratic majority is of the utmost importance; this gives the Democrats the benefit of not only having the majority in all of the comittees, but also of chairing said comittees.
This is important because of the way that legislation progresses through the legal distillery.
Now, conventional wisdom says that no matter how someone may vote on certain issues, the mere fact that they have a ‘D’ attached to their name gets the Democrats one step closer to committee majorities, and being able to decide on what goes to the floor and what does not (this is the same logic that explains why 80% of the bills that the Democrats have put forth have not made it out of committee in this Republican congress).
(sorry, I don’t have a link for that, it is from memory).
Conventional wisdom also holds that those Democrats who do not fully buy into the party platform (whatever that means, at this point) will not get influential committee assignments.
You can see the obvious problem if we elect too many of these types of Democrats.
However, I do see the value in running this type of candidate (like a Ben Nelson) in a primarily red area.
Where it seems like folly to me is cases like the PA Senate race.
Oops…got too much into analysis there. I hope that at least shed a little light on why people are so desperate to acquire a D-majority by any means necessary. It has to do with the committees, not the full Senate votes.
You can see the obvious problem if we elect too many of these types of Democrats.
That is exactly what I was referring to–and, to my way of thinking, a vote for a DINO like that would be a wasted vote. That is exactly where I am at now.
— or even just having a larger minority — gives greater power to the Dems who are willing to do something good. The majority party gets to set the agenda.
Sometimes you vote against a really bad candidate or really bad party more than for a mediocre candidate or party.
MB will undoubtedly have a smarter, more beautiful answer for you.
Understand that one, but, the fact of the matter is that so far, the dems haven’t–they have just caved in. By voting for a DINO, how does one know that you won’t get more of the same?
…even know for certain that getting a Democratic majority in the Senate will guarantee that we keep out the next Cro Magnon Mist … er … the pResident nominates for the Supreme Court.
But, in the short run, Democrats in control of the Senate (and House) at least gives us a chance at stopping the Administration’s worst excesses. Without majorities, there is zero hope.
Not my ideal world.
That is my point exactly–see how the current congresscritters are when it comes to caving in–we don’t know. And, by electing DINO’s, there is just more of the same.
we got back the House and the Senate by a thin majority, and Bush marched into Iran at the behest of that Dem majority because we have to support our President no matter what…for his newest foray into international politics.
That surely would be the end of my support for Dems on a national level. Not even Feingold or Kennedy or Boxer would keep me from revolting at that travesty.
1000 days of Sodom?
Refuse, resist, shut it down!
We could trust our side to do the right thing. I would love to hear some of the dem leaders come out and say, we will start Impeachment hearings the day after we regain the majority.
I firmly believe Bush will have a complete mental/emotional breakdown before the end of his term in office. As reality presses ever more firmly against his delusional mindset, his fragile eg
I firmly believe Bush will have a complete mental/emotional breakdown before the end of his term in office. As reality presses ever more firmly against his delusional mindset, his fragile and unstable psyche will finally crack; his petulance and anger will shatter the facade of emotional composure that even now he is barely able to maintain.
I don’t know what happened here but sorry for the double post.
Well lets just pray he isn’t sitting next to the nuke red button when he does.