Immigration Law Becomes More Oppressive

…How long will it be before all immigrants and those needing visas to visit will be required to have an implanted computer chip for ID and tracking. Think I’m kidding? The FDA has already approved such an experimental chip for use on 1,000 test subjects. Wanna volunteer? They’ll even know when you go to the “john.” If they’re pleased with the results from these “lab rats”, it’s not far-fetched to imagine a new repressive law one day requiring all of us – citizens, immigrants and visa holders – to be so-implanted so they can monitor every move we make and maybe even one day know what we think…

Click Here for More Related Commentary

Note: This is the second of a five-part series.

Major changes in immigration law were enacted in 1996 when the 104th Republican Congress enacted and Bill (“I feel your pain”) Clinton signed into law the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA) and the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA).  These were repressive laws supposedly intended mainly to control illegal immigration and combat “terrorism.”  They did neither most often.  Instead, their provisions affect American families, legal immigrants and others seeking to emigrate legally.

Under the 1996 statutes, legal immigrants are routinely detained without bond, deported without consideration for discretionary relief, restricted in their access to counsel, and barred from appealing to the courts.  The laws also allow additional grounds for deportation and can subject long-term immigrants to mandatory detention and automatic deportation for even minor offenses like shoplifting, disturbing the peace or having a “joint” in their pocket.  Low-level immigration officials act as judge and jury (no jury of their peers is allowed), and the federal courts are allowed no power to review most deportation decisions and INS activities.  These laws can also be applied retroactively.  As a result, many law-abiding immigrants living here for many years can now be deported for minor offenses and youthful indiscretions that may have occurred many years ago.  These laws literally show no mercy.  They allow no second chances, they can change the rules if so desired, and they deny the targeted immigrant due process in a court of law.  The result has been families unjustly torn apart and made to suffer.  Where are you when we need you Emma Lazarus?

Our leadership before and under George Bush never seemed or seems to miss an opportunity to fail to miss an opportunity to do the right thing.  During Bill Clinton’s second term Congress passed more immigration legislation in 1997 that spurned most Central American refugee claims and again in 2000 that offered only modest relief for some undocumented immigrants. It was better than nothing but not by much.

POST 9/11 THE GLOVES CAME OFF ALONG WITH THE MASK, AND IT’S A NEW BALL GAME – NOT ONE ANY IMMIGRANT OF COLOR OR MUSLIM WANTS TO PLAY 

Everything changed after 9/11, as if we didn’t know by now.  Start with the passage of the repressive and now infamous USA Patriot Act in 2001.  It provided funding for more border guards and technologies to spot and detain/arrest possible “terrorists” trying to enter the country.  It also authorized the indefinite detention of any noncitizen suspected of engaging in “terrorist” activities.  It gave the Attorney General complete discretion to decide who was a suspected “terrorist” and do it based on no evidence.  Those of us paying attention know how things have turned out.  But not enough of us have, and that’s why this bill passed almost without debate allowing the government to move us dangerously closer to a full-blown national security police state and get away with it – so far.

This act, only a tyrant could love, stripped all legal protection of liberty and justice for Muslims and Arabs in the US or those wishing to come.  It sanctioned their being monitored without notification as well as their NGOs, civic, charitable and religious organizations.  The American Bar Association calls this unconstitutional, but just try to get redress.  It allowed the Justice Department the right to round up and detain an unknown number of “suspects” from the Middle East and South Asia overall including at least 5,000 Muslim men only three of whom were charged with a crime.  Federal immigration courts are allowed to hold secret hearings on their status, and those thought to be in the country illegally or who had some immigration violation were ordered deported even when going back to their home country risked their being arrested and tortured.  It also gave the government authority to freeze the assets of any organization it deems suspect for any reason.  It’s since been open season making it legal for the government to conduct a witch-hunt which has gone on ever since including allowing several federal agencies to raid the homes and offices of the national Muslim leadership in Northern Virginia.  It all amounts to a war on Muslims and Islam, especially targeted at Muslim immigrants of color or from the Middle East and South Asia.

A NEW CLIMATE TO SILENCE DISSENT, DESTROY CIVIL LIBERTIES AND DISCOURAGE IMMIGRATION

The post 9/11 climate cast a pall of fear over the nation that especially affects our immigrant population, particularly Muslims and especially those from 25 designated countries (all but one majority Muslim).  It also includes poor and desperate Latinos mostly from Mexico and Central America who come here undocumented (an estimated 60% of all Latinos are coming from Mexico) or wish to when they can’t do it legally.  They practically have no other choice because of the economic devastation caused them by the exploitative US instituted so-called “neoliberal free trade agreements” that have destroyed their ability to earn a living at home.

It’s resulted in a mass witch-hunt roundup and secret detention of thousands.  Also many individuals were targeted for deportation and in their removal proceedings were under gag orders and prevented from talking to anyone.  In addition, all foreign students were tracked as potential terrorists, recent Muslim immigrants were asked to voluntarily submit to law enforcement agency interviews and hospitals were required to collect information on immigrant status before providing Medicaid.  Also repressive and restrictive regulations were established governing the granting of visas including requiring face-to-face interviews never before needed and withholding visas for certain categories of people until the FBI conducts name checks to assure they’re not a terrorist threat.  Fingerprinting of all visa-bearing travelers is also required either when they get them or when arriving at airports and seaports.  After October 26, 2004 the law required this be done by collecting biometric identifiers at US visa-issuing offices abroad. 

How long will it be before all immigrants and those needing visas to visit will be required to have an implanted computer chip for ID and tracking.  Think I’m kidding?  The FDA has already approved such an experimental chip for use on 1,000 test subjects.  Wanna volunteer?  They’ll even know when you go to the “john.” If they’re pleased with the results from these “lab rats”, it’s not far-fetched to imagine a new repressive law one day requiring all of us – citizens, immigrants and visa holders – to be so-implanted so they can monitor every move we make and maybe even one day know what we think. 

The new Department of Homeland Security (aka “Big Brother”) now controls this Orwellian nightmare system.  It’s run by an unindicted war criminal, John Negroponte, US ambassador to Honduras from 1981 – 1985 where he was our point man overseeing the infamous Contra wars in Nicaragua and death squad activities and human rights abuses throughout the region.  He then briefly served as our “ambassador to the new Iraq” post illegal invasion where he likely introduced the “Salvador death squad option” now being used intensively in a crazed attempt to foment a real civil war to divide the country.  It’s modeled after the one he was in charge of in El Salvador against that country’s freedom-fighting resistance combating the brutal US supported right wing government in the early 80s. 

DHS makes the visa rules, decides who can or cannot get them and be allowed into the country.  In the past the State Department handled this.  It was simpler then which encouraged foreigners to visit, attend school here or emigrate.  Now with a maze of hostile regulations,  many foreigners are dissuaded from coming at all or prevented from doing so.  This has adversely affected US corporations, the travel industry and also many universities heavily reliant on foreign students and scholars.  It’s caused leaders and officials in business, science and education as well as civil libertarians to be concerned enough to warn this can only be detrimental to the strength of the nation and our precious freedoms fast disappearing.

Blame the Congress for this mess.  With immigration a hot issue, they passed the Homeland Security Act in 2002 which abolished the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) and moved its functions from the Justice Department to the newly created Department of Homeland Security (DHS).  Within the DHS the Bureau of Border Security now has authority over our borders and enforcement of our immigration laws.  The Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services was given responsibility over visas, citizenship, asylum, and refugee status.  Look for more repressive and restrictive rules ahead in a post 9/11 climate hostile to people whether they already live here legally, wish to  visit, and especially if they want to emigrate and happen to have a darker complexion than most of us.

Coming in Part 3 on Friday, May 5:  A Nation Addicted to the Need for Enemies – Real or Invented

Written by Stephen Lendman, (email – lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net) who lives in Chicago. Stephen maintains a blog at http://sjlendman.blogspot.com, and writes a regular column at www.populistamerica.com

Author: populist

The essays we offer are unapologetically presented for you to read & analyze. Many are offered as a similar view to ours & others simply to invite debate. Thus, the views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of the Populist Party.