The horror – Liberal Street Fighter
What a deeply psychotic country this is. Mired in magical thinking, enamored with our own self-image as a “good” country … we spread death and destruction around with nary a thought, then act suprised and upset when an incident like Haditha happens. People shake their heads, media newsmodels sadly report that US Marines “snapped” and committed an atrocity.
How horribly, terribly WRONG this little bit of cold comfort is. It allows us to maintain a distance from responsibilty for what is being done in this latest of our wars, as it has allowed citizens and politicians to avoid responsibility in wars past.
LTC Bob Bateman relates this tale over on Alterman’s Altercation blog, from his time training troops at Fort Hood:
Private Ericsson was the blond-haired blue-eyed epitome of American youth. A little older than his peers at 22, he was often the first to speak up when I called for a response. In this case I had just put forward the question, “What would you do?” to a hypothetical situation in which several prisoners had been captured who may, or may not, know about an ambush the enemy had emplaced for our unit some distance away. The prisoners appeared to be civilians, taken in a village from which we had, in this notional scenario, recently taken fire.
“I’d shoot one of them sir, to see if it got the next one to talk,” said Ericsson with a perfectly straight face. The room remained silent.
This was back in 1995, long before 911 and a Chief Monarch declared the Rules of War, the Geneva Conventions and the US Constitution null and void by imperial fiat.
Bateman concludes:
Now is not the time to explain how such things happen, or why. Although I have spent a good part of my professional and intellectual life seeking to understand how things like this occur, and believe that I have some understanding of the phenomena (here), it is entirely too early to begin commenting now. In no small part this is because any such explanation at this point may be construed as apologia, which is in itself not a good thing. If events occurred as they are
currently reported to have occurred, then there is nothing more to say than, “It is wrong.”Yet at the same time I cannot help but note that those who might be inclined to trumpet these events may themselves do well to maintain some perspective. War, in short, is savage. All wars, bar none. It has always been savage, and it will always be savage. No matter how “Good” the war is, how completely altruistic the motives of the civilians who send us to this conflict or that one may be, no matter how necessary a war may be, at the level of the Soldier, War is Savage. Professionals know this, and it is one of the very real reasons that we are (somewhat ironically, for those who do not know us or our morals) so often opposed to the use of force. In other words, we have an informed idea of what rests inside Pandora’s Box, and this colors our thoughts when considering force.
At the most basic level, the role of the professional military officer is to control and direct the use of violence. It is to confine the savage, but you cannot prevent it entirely. You can train for a lifetime, devote vast resources to the creation of a professional force, and emplace institutional checks to reduce the incidence of misdirected violence…but you will never, ever, stop it entirely. Please keep this in mind.
Given that good officers do try to maintain an atmosphere where discipline prevails, how are they to do that when the Commander in Chief is a grinning fatuous fratboy who dares insurgents to “bring it on”, a man who’s administration has condoned and practiced savagery in service of its global war on terror? Our country has already thrown out the rules that are supposed to govern the practice of warfare, of espionage and diplomacy. We are a people gone rogue, yet we still get the vapors when confronted by sadly predictable outcome of our belligerence.
We’ve thrust men and women into an intolerable position, failed to provide even the most basic support to them and their families. We’ve sent them back often on multiple tours in an environment where all law and sense have broken down. If you look at the description of what took place in Haditha, or Abu Grabe or the numerous other Countless My Lai Massacres in Iraq, what is striking, if you care to confront it, is how deliberately and carefully executed the atrocity in question was carried out.
after gunning down the five fleeing the taxi, a few members of Kilo Company moved through four homes along nearby streets, killing 19 men, women and children.
The stories are careful to go on to describe that stress led to the Marines “snapping”, the same excuse used to explain away My Lai in that past war launched on another set of lies. This is, frankly, crap. If you consider the contradictions being forced upon troops and Marines in Iraq, one can see how, after extended tours and a failure of leadership from above, the whole sense of being part of a society can collapse into nothing but the Unit. Survival would almost seem to dictate that the Unit becomes the only measure of worth, the only thing that will get a soldier and his buddies home alive. When this is described as “snapping”, it seems to excuse this break from the rules of war as a kind of psychosis. This is, in my opinion, wrong. It’s more like a group sociopathy. Anything outside the Unit is either a help, or a danger, and there is a cold rationality to a decision reached to remove any perceived danger.
Remember, then, that these men and women, forced to try to survive in this primal war, where one is either prey, or predator, these men and women will be coming home. Home to a deeply shallow culture, a culture that wallows in religious platitudes as it devolves into a you’re-on-your-own Hobbsian wet dream. A culture where the rightwing uses increasingly strident eliminationist rhetoric against political foes, against immigrants, gays, women or whatever other convenient target is the “other” du jour. As mental health care for returning veterans continues to be neglected, how will they adapt to a civilian life? How many, like Charles Joseph Whitman, will find the war following them home? We, abandoning diplomacy for the sword, have thrown these men and women into the abyss, yet we recoil in horror when they BECOME the abyss. The abyss threatens to swallow us all.
It does no good to point the finger at Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield and Gonzales. They are us, for all intents and purposes. The crimes committed in Iraq are OUR crimes. They fight in our name, in the name of a people who worship swaggering bullies and violence and a world where there is no room for redemption, for communication and change, only the Long War.
Update [2006-6-2 0:21:39 by Madman in the Marketplace]:
The BBC is reporting that they have tape of another massacre (hat tip to Crooks & Liars):
The video pictures obtained by the BBC appear to contradict the US account of the events in Ishaqi, about 100km (60 miles) north of Baghdad, on 15 March 2006.
The US authorities said they were involved in a firefight after a tip-off that an al-Qaeda supporter was visiting the house.
According to the Americans, the building collapsed under heavy fire killing four people – a suspect, two women and a child.
But a report filed by Iraqi police accused US troops of rounding up and deliberately shooting 11 people in the house, including five children and four women, before blowing up the building.
The video tape obtained by the BBC shows a number of dead adults and children at the site with what our world affairs editor John Simpson says were clearly gunshot wounds.
The pictures came from a hardline Sunni group opposed to coalition forces.
It has been cross-checked with other images taken at the time of events and is believed to be genuine, the BBC’s Ian Pannell in Baghdad says.
Update [2006-6-2 0:53:29 by Madman in the Marketplace]:
Howie Klein over at Down With Tyranny has another update, posting an entire piece that originally appeared in the The Daily Telegraph back in January:
In January, shortly before the first published reports emerged about US marines methodically gunning down men, women and children in the Iraqi town of Haditha, The Daily Telegraph spent time at the main camp of the battalion under investigation.
Rumours had spread that what happened on Nov 19 diverged from the official line that locals were killed by a roadside bomb.
None of the troops wanted to talk, but even a short stay with the men of the 3rd Bn 1st Marine Division in their camp located in Haditha Dam on the town’s outskirts, made clear it was a place where institutional discipline had frayed and was even approaching breakdown.[…]
Haditha was shockingly different– a feral place where the marines hardly washed; a number had abandoned the official living quarters to set up separate encampments with signs ordering outsiders to keep out; and a daily routine punctured by the emergency alarm of the dam itself with its antiquated and crumbling machinery.
The dam is one of Iraq’s largest hydroelectric stations. A US special operations unit had secured it during the invasion and American troops had been there ever since. Now they were spread across the dozen or so levels where Iraqi engineers once lived.
The lifts were smashed, the lighting provided only a half gloom. Inside, the grinding of the dam machinery made talking difficult. The place routinely stank of rotten eggs, a by-product apparently of the grease to keep the turbines running.
Jesus …
Won’t we be seeing more ‘snapping’ with every extra tour of duty these soldiers endure?
I really hate to say this, but I am half-wondering if that is the whole idea.
that thought has crossed my mind.
so it’s not just me…
Now I am praying the RFK Jr article gets more attention, although it is too late for some…
these thoughts have also haunted my mind of late.
Professional Marines turn into professional “snappers”? Like a perveted change from loaves to fishes? You can’t mean it.
As for me, to accept that these guys “snapped” requires a perversion of thinking. It requires that: the Marine Corps doesn’t train “the few, the proud” professional; it trains the too many thugs who roam in killer gangs, incapable of military discipline.
I will not pardon the Marines involved in this latest massacre with the convenient excuse of having “snapped.” I hold them, their commanders, and those who trained them responsible. This is not a lone incident. Our war in Iraq is a long bitter history of pocket genocide at our hands, the hands of other allies’, and the hands of various mostly ethnically divided factions. And the Iraqi incarnation of the Taliban, a cult of religious assassins who cut their teeth in Afghanistan.
The great leverage of civilian insurgency is that it can never be a legitimate target of traditional warfare in the Geneva sense. Remember, the US is presently ruled by ideologues who think the “Geneva sense of war” is passe. No wonder the corruption has seeped into the ranks.
War crimes, war crimes, war crimes is all I see around me. Will we be able to survive anathema?
I don’t mean to pardon them.
Morality requires a personal commitment AND a social context, a shared set of rules. Leave people in this environment long enough, WRONG enough, with corrupt leadership that refuses to maintain a strong system of rules, laws, morality and their “society” basically shrinks to all they have left, their buddies, and enough of a threat, and the wrong guy or guys leading that unit, and some men will choose to become sociopaths, because the civilians or prisoners in their way are only threats, not people.
To see this isn’t to pardon the groups of men and women who go down this road, but rather to see that it is inevitable when a “leadership” like our current one creates a climate like we have now.
There are more Hadithas, as there were more than that one My Lai. There are more coming, and some of them will happen here.
There are more Hadithas, as there were more than that one My Lai. There are more coming, and some of them will happen here.
It has already started–in New Orleans, and is continuing, spreading across the Mexico border, and with Part D…
No one is safe in this country. How low have we sunk? When will it end, if it will end?
reads like we’re saying the same thing. Horrors abound.
So the necessity for “hillbilly armor” by intentionally under-equipping the troops may be one way of make “snapping” happen? Interesting. It would explain the lingering and long-standing equipment problems.
Oh God!
I think they give a lot of thought to everything they do, and every step of the way Bush and Cheney have SAID what they were going to do, then they’ve done it.
Iran will be bombed within months … they will continue to build bigger bases and bomb more of Iraq, and more and more units will decide that it is them against the world.
I am so glad to read that my opinion is shared.
The idea about troops “snapping” under pressure is being advanced as a way of legitimizing the results of such behavior by blaming the stressful conditions experienced by our soldiers on the victims of their atrocities.
Every tyrant and warmonger in the history of humankind knows that if they want to maximize the support they get for their violent aggressions they must always demonize the enemy and blame any failing of our own forces on that enemy. Our own forces must never be blamed for being the proximate cause of any tragedy; it is always the others who invite the tragedy that befalls them by their actions.
People who advance this spurious and deeply fractured logic can never attribute blame to themselves or their agents for anything.
I heard today that the man that died in the IED explosion was literally cut in half.
I have no idea how I would handle the sight of my buddy in that condition. I know that it in no way justifies going on a killing rampage of children, women and old men. However, I can understand the despair and rage those soldiers must have been feeling. Sitting in my comfortable chair, it’s hard for me to work up a whole lot of moral superiority.
It’s a tragedy. War should be a last resort. It’s not a game of Risk.
What I’m saying is that we should reject attempts to get us to to easily accept such behavior as “inevitable” by shifting the blame for it onto the victims.
In our (supposedly) civilized world rape is a commonplace event, yet while we may understand to a certain extent why rapists rape, we should not allow ourselves to succumb to the “blame the victim” meme in order to allow ourselves to deal with the ugly reality of rape more easily in our own minds. The, “after all she/he was asking for it” is a completely illegitimate argument and should not be tolerated to any degree on any level.
And to my mind it is precisely this kind of bogus thought-reform type of manipulative rhetoric that is being used here. The “If only those Iraqis who lived on that street came out of their houses and told the GIs where the bombs were none of this would have happenned!” (Never mind that the insurgents would have come for them all later in the day and killed them all for helping the Americans.)
that’s not what I’m doing at all. What I’m saying is that a situation has been created that naturally leads to this outcome. It in no way excuses this war crime, but I’m trying to say that the Bush Administration and the civilians running the Pentagon have created an environment that leads to just this sort of breakdown.
Putting soldiers in this environment is akin to pursuing rendition and handing over captives to states that practice torture. The Bush Administration has deliberately created this outcome, as policy, as a tactic of their “long war”, all while trying to wash their hands, and OUR hands, of the consequences, pinning it on a few “bad apples”.
Madman,
I was responding to BooMan’s reply to my comment above. I know you are not saying what I’m talking about.
Certainly the lies at the foundation of this war, the further lies needed to keep the soldiers capable of running over civilians or shooting them up at the drop of the hat in the name of security have created conditions that inevitably lead to an environment that fosters such restraint-free barbarism.
As one who’s always believed that the true Bush regime agenda in Iraq has always been about expanding and intensifying war in the region rather than achieving stability and security, I would not be at all surprised to learn that in fact the neocon architects of this debacle actually favor instances of wanton brutality because it helps guarantee that we’ll have a steady stream of new enemies we create by our actions.
Cynical? Yes! Realistic? Perhaps! It certainly wouldn’t be the first time extreme brutality has been used to provoke others in order to establish a pretext for broader annihilation in a theater of war or under a military junta. (I witnessed first hand some of this sort of tactical application of brutality as provocation while in Argentina several times during the reign of the generals.) I can tell you Cheney and Perle and Feith and Rumsfeld and William Kristol and Krauthammer and a host of others would have been right at home in that regime and would have been enthusiasts for increased brutality there just as they are for it in Iraq now.
In any case, I agree with the thrust and tenor of your diary, just so there’s no mistake about that.
I just reread my post above and I think I see why you responded the way you did. Now I want to clarify again briefly.
Where I said;
When I said here I was referring not to you and your diary but to the Bush regime’s rhetoric and that of their compliant handmaidens in the media who carry their propaganda. They are the ones whjo are working to establish the blame for these atrocities on the victims and on circumstance.
oh, thanks. I was just afraid I wasn’t being clear. I play word games too much some times, enjoy turns of phrase too much, and I fear I’m often not as clear as I should be … but this is how I write, and it’s hard to change.
Thanks. Given the other war crimes we’re already hearing about, I’m truly afraid of where we are headed.
I have seen people horribly injured. My first impulse was to get them medical help, followed by protecting myself and any others from harm, and finally throwing up and crying. Never, never, have I had to restrain myself from indescriminately mowing down anyone who just happened to be in the area, because the free reign of mindless, destructive fury is not an acceptable response in a civilized society. I don’t think you’d have a difficult choice, either, Booman. I can’t imagine you in a fit of anger lashing out at innocent children.
Mad because somebody killed your buddy ? Pound in the nearest door and shoot children in the head.
This behavior is disturbingly familiar to anyone who’s worked with domestic violence. Get dissed at work, come home and whack the kids. Are you pissed at the world ? Climb on a roof top and pick off people at random.
My point is that immature people with poor impulse control can and should be screened out of the military. (They also shouldn’t be encouraged to breed or run for office, but that’s another issue.)
“Everybody”, under even the worst kind of stress, does NOT shoot babies in the head. You have to come to the situation with normal social sanctions already switched off.
The batterer who knows he won’t get away with slugging his boss, beats his wife because can. He “snaps” rather conveniently.
The question I want answered is, What message were these Marines getting that made them believe they could murder civilians with impunity ? Why were they so sure they’d get away with it ?
The prophet Joseph Conrad’s story from 100 years ago still says it all–and he was the definitive outsider, an unwashed alien so to speak, writing classic stories from his ships bunk in his second language.
brando a saint who lost sight of heaven he died of encephalitis hollywooditis same the disease killed orson welles (a kenoshan by birth)
rip in heaven saint conrad
Osama has won. Whether we ever get him dead or alive doesn’t matter. He has turned us into this guy:
I found the expanded Bateman quote above to be extremely right on pitch. War is savage by its very nature, and experienced military officers know this. Rules and strict discipline that demand adherence to regulations such as the Geneva Conventions can and do limit the collateral damage, the worst of vicious atrocities — but even they cannot always prevent such things from occurring in the pressure-cooker heat of conflict.
But when those rules and restraints are removed, when there are NO attempts to maintain such discipline, either in a controlled environment (such as Abu Graib) where there really is no threat to deal with, just unarmed, restrained prisoners… Or in a potentially dangerous environment such as a hostile urban neighborhood or a small town or village elsewhere in Iraq… then there is nothing to restrain or prevent that savagery from being the normal state of how things are done.
And that is the real war crime — that in removing all restraints, by undermining and destroying from the top down, the limitations the military system had built in to prevent such savagery from occurring, the Bush Administration has all but encouraged this behavior in any and all stuations, at all levels. They have created a breeding ground for monsters.
This isn’t a case of a few bad apples — it’s putting all the apples together in a tainted barrel that’s guaranteed to cause some rot to all but a rare few — some just a little, some by a lot. The only way to fix it is to take ALL the apples out of the tainted barrel in the first place.
Bring them home.
VERY well put.
Exactly. War should always be an absolute LAST RESORT.
Totally predictable. This diary, The soldiers, their actions and the outcome.
The reason it is all totally predictable is because of the following.
Place a outnumbered force in any country where the entire population is not only hostile but every civilian becomes the enemy and what do think the end results at pointed end for that force is going to be?
In Europe in WWII America and it’s Allies called the insurgents the resistance. The Germans called them Terrorist and Enemies of the State.
All of this was predictable.
The bad part about it all. It’s going to get even worse as the occupation goes on and military is forced to defend smaller and smaller patches of the ground they hold. In order to exercise complete control every single street and road in Iraq requires two platoons to maintain order 24/7. Every building must then be searched for weapons and hiding places for weapons. In other words troop levels need to brought up to 3 to 5 million for effective control to occur and impose a peace by force.
You can bomb all you want from a distance but when it comes to holding ground you have to have sufficient troops levels. Even then it is still a losing battle.
The leadership in America knew or were told all this before they declared war on Iraq. So the fact that atrocities are taking place is totally predictable since the leadership abandoned the humanitarian mission in favor of the occupation mission after Baghdad fell.
Expansion of the war to Iran will cutoff all the troops and supplies lines in and out of the Iraq after the Straits are closed to all shipping by rocket and suicide attacks on any ship attempting to re-supply or reinforce the troops on the ground in Iraq. It doesn’t take a genius to figure this out. The troops on the ground in know how fragile and tenuous the reality is.
For them every threat eliminated now is just one more threat that they will not have to deal with if the war is expanded to Iran. Morale, values and common sense is non-existent in the current environment.
This is now a war of attrition and not one of occupation. America like in Vietnam, has lost and now needs to come to grips with this reality and bring the troops home while it still can and there are still troops left to bring home.