In case you missed it, over the weekend the AP issued a weather forecast, for this week, next month, and the rest of your life.
The AP likes to keep it factual and punchy, if not short and sweet. So here it is:
For the next week, much of the nation should expect more “extreme heat,” the National Weather Service predicts.
_In the month of August, most of the United States will see “above normal temperatures,” forecasters say.
_For the long-term future, the world will see more and worse killer heat waves because of global warming, scientists say.
After that, you might be inclined to look for stories about Scarlett Johansson, or American Idol (although given the above news, I can’t believe people find much comfort in the statistic the Idolateers are fond of spreading around, that more people voted for the current Idol winner than ever voted for a President of the U.S.) But some of the details might answer your questions about what’s really going on, which suggests what we really should be doing.
And since then, more hot news: More than 60 percent of the United States now has abnormally dry or drought conditions, stretching from Georgia to Arizona and across the north through the Dakotas, Minnesota, Montana and Wisconsin, said Mark Svoboda, a climatologist for the National Drought Mitigation Center at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln.
Today(Monday), power grid operators are predicting record-breaking power use in the Midwest as a result of the heat.
So what is going on? No, climatologists aren’t blaming this particular heat wave on global warming, at least not exactly.
Heat waves and global warming “are very strongly” connected, said Kevin Trenberth, climate analysis branch chief at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. The immediate cause of the California heat wave — and other heat waves — is day-to-day weather, he said.
But what they can say is that global warming contributes to every heat wave, including this one, by changing general characteristics. For example, “what global warming has done is make the nights warmer in general and the days drier, which help turn merely uncomfortably hot days into killer heat waves, Trenberth said.”
And this is turning out to be a major lesson in what we need to do to cope with the Climate Crisis, because:
…recent studies in the past five years show that climate change is at its most dangerous during Extreme events, such as high temperatures, droughts and flooding, he said. “These (heat) events always occur. What global warming does is push it up another notch,” Trenberth said.
Which brings us to the longer term forecasts.
…the computer models show that soon, we’ll get many more — and hotter — heat waves that will leave the old Dust Bowl records of the 1930s in the dust, said Ken Kunkel, director of the Center for Atmospheric Sciences at the Illinois State Water Survey.
This is today’s reason for why we have to get beyond Climate Crisis denial and get to work on both aspects of it. First, fix it: when you know what’s likely to happen, you can prepare for it (even if it doesn’t happen, wouldn’t that be better that getting caught unprepared?) Scientists are telling us to prepare for worse and more frequent heat waves. We need to use what we’re learning in this one and what we’ve learned in the past to prepare for the next ones, and to fix whatever can be fixed–in public health, in energy distribution,etc–that looks like a problem.
For example, many if not most of the 150+ people who’ve died due to this month’s heat wave were elderly, living alone. The Mayor of Fresno said the realization of this has turned his entire city “into one big Neighborhood Watch.” So fixes don’t have to be high tech or expensive or even all that complicated. Though some of them are going to be, like dealing with flooding problems in places like Bombay with the more frequent and much more intense rainstorms that overwhelm the infrastructure.
While we get serious and fix it, we simultaneously need to do what we need to do to stop it–to stop even worse heating, even worse heat waves, droughts, storms, and finally a runaway shift in the earth’s climate that could make the planet unrecognizeable. We can debate the means–is the alliance announced today between England and California on trading carbon emissions going to work? But at this point, addressing the problem is the necessary first step in responsible governance.
Is it too late? We’re going to try to fix it anyway, so why not try to get ahead of it and do it right? As for stopping it, if it isn’t too late it soon will be, so if we are going to have any chance, we’d better get on it.
Besides, what are you going to tell your grandchildren–we thought we couldn’t stop it, so we didn’t even try?
Also at the orange, if you’re quick.
What did you do, once you knew? that will be the cry of our great great grandchildren… if we last that long.
Great diary, thanks!
“what did you do, once you knew?” That isn’t a song lyric, isn’t? Because if it isn’t, it’s going to be.
hieroglyphic stairway
it’s 3:23 in the morning
and I’m awake
because my great great grandchildren
won’t let me sleep
my great great grandchildren
ask me in dreams
what did you do while the planet was plundered?
what did you do when the earth was unraveling?
surely you did something
when the seasons started failing?
as the mammals, reptiles, birds were all dying?
did you fill the streets with protest
when democracy was stolen?
what did you do
once
you
knew?
I’m riding home on the Colma train
I’ve got the voice of the milky way in my dreams
I have teams of scientists
feeding me data daily
and pleading I immediately
turn it into poetry
I want just this consciousness reached
by people in range of secret frequencies
contained in my speech
I am the desirous earth
equidistant to the underworld
and the flesh of the stars
I am everything already lost
the moment the universe turns transparent
and all the light shoots through the cosmos
I use words to instigate silence
I’m a hieroglyphic stairway
in a buried Mayan city
suddenly exposed by a hurricane
a satellite circling earth
finding dinosaur bones
in the Gobi desert
I am telescopes that see back in time
I am the precession of the equinoxes,
the magnetism of the spiraling sea
I’m riding home on the Colma train
with the voice of the milky way in my dreams
I am myths where violets blossom from blood
like dying and rising gods
I’m the boundary of time
soul encountering soul
and tongues of fire
it’s 3:23 in the morning
and I can’t sleep
because my great great grandchildren
ask me in dreams
what did you do while the earth was unraveling?
I want just this consciousness reached
by people in range of secret frequencies
contained in my speech
drew dellinger–©2003 1-866-POETICS
what a wonderful poem. Thanks for sharing it.
From everything that I’ve been reading on this subject I’ve come to the following conclusions,
The time for stopping or fixing global warming is long gone. All that counts now is how prepared is the human race to face reality, prepare for the worst and when it occurs deal with it.
The people who needed to change their living habits to slow global warming died 10 generations ago. Those people never even imagined the problem could exist given the level of technology they had at the time.
Okay, let’s get some terms together. The phenomenon called global warming, or the greenhouse effect, already exists, and is now having effects on the planet and its lifeforms, including humanity. These effects have causes that go back decades and perhaps hundreds of years, as greenhouse gases accumulated in the atmosphere in such profusion that natural processes could no longer deal with them.
But has the tipping point been passed when nothing we can do will prevent the extent of heating that would radically change the planet and essentially kill off many “higher” species, and create such chaos that civilization will become impossible? Most scientists say no, although there are some very respected ones–James Lovelock for example–who say probably yes to at least some of that.
I hope I made clear in the context of this diary–and I will continue to try to make it clear–that when I use the words “fix it” and “stop it,” I’m talking about the two distinct processes that we need to engage in, simultaneously, in order to deal wth the climate crisis.
“Fix it” is shorthand for dealing with predictable and possible effects in the short term of the heating that has already started and will happen for the next few decades. This is heating we can’t prevent because of the time lag between cause (greenhouse gases) and effect. All we can do is fix what problems this heating causes, such as heat waves, droughts, floodng, disease, changes in agriculture, culture, etc. But we have to admit that the climate crisis is real and is happening, so we can anticpate and plan, and be ready to respond to its manifestations.
“Stop it” is shorthand for stopping the growth in greenhouse gases and severly cutting back on dispersing those gases, so that we have a chance to prevent the worst effects in the farther future–the “past the tipping point” changes in climate that would change the planet itself, and make life extremely difficult if not impossible for our species, and certainly for continuing civilization.
To me it is important to be clear about the effects and time frames each set of efforts is likely to have. It is true that we can go to clean energy tomorrow and it will not stop the climate crisis for our lifetime. But it may stop the worst effects of the climate crisis for future generations.
Likewise it is important to realize that switching to clean energy or cutting back on greenhouse gases isn’t the only thing we need to do. We need to understand what the climate crisis may do in our lifetime–this month, next year, etc.–and prepare to meet those challenges. Drought and its effects, patterns of sudden hard rainfall in certan places and its effects, new patterns of diseases as mosquitoes etc. change and perhaps increase their range–and lots of other things we think of separately, if we think of them at all, but are all related, and can all be more or less anticpated once we understand the nature of the climate crisis we’re in.
Our difference here is based on belief. I believe the tipping point was reached about 100 years or so ago based on the data I’ve studied. The process started more that a 1000 years ago as a natural evolution of the world.
It’s not that there is a I’m right and your wrong argument involved. What is left is the degrees of how to slow a process that is going to occur and reach it’s peak in the cycle and spark a new Ice Age. This could be as soon as ten years or as far in the future as 200 hundred years. Either way the process is underway and is something that no one has the technology to stop right at the moment.
Global warming and the effects it produces on the world humanity lives in is going to requires adaptability to react to the negative and positive impacts the process produces on the planet.
This is only going to be a “crisis” if humanity doesn’t prepare for the worst possible scenarios now that we are finally starting to understand a little bit about how this process works.
I respect your opinion and your reading of the data, although your view seems premised on natural changes that have no direct relationship to the greenhouse effect of the industrial age. It is a minority opinion and I believe good governance requires responding to the best science available, while keeping in mind the worst possible scenarios and planning for them as time and resources permit.
However, the “crisis” is not in the future. The people dying in heat waves, the drought, the destruction of New Orleans, the increase in diseases from mosquitoes and other disease-bearing insects, are all predicted consequences of the Climate Crisis, although the predictions could not be precise as to where and when these phenomena would manifest. First of all, our government should be responding much better to these situations as a matter of course. But it is much more likely we will as a society be ready and able to respond when we understand that these things aren’t random but part of a pattern, and they are likely to increase in frequency and severity every year. That’s the “fix it” part of my response to the ongoing crisis.
Longterm, it does us no harm (I would argue) to shift to clean technologies, to practice conservation, and to value the planet while we still have it; doing all this has benefits beyond eliminating greenhouse gases. But in truth we cannot know the future. Still, it seems to me our moral imperative to use the knowledge we have developed at this point in the evolution of our species, to safeguard the future. We should do what we can to stop it from getting worse and out of control. If it is out of control, there’s by definition nothing we can do, but since we don’t know that for sure now, we have a moral duty to do what might work. While it is remotely conceivable that we are a decade or so away from a new Ice Age (at least in parts of the northern hemisphere) that again is a very minority opinion. Most climate scientists see all of this playing out for at least a century.
A century is a long time to work at it, but it’s not a long time if we do nothing. Children playing in the yard right now could live to know the fate of the earth.
And I come back to my question. Do we tell our grandchildren that we didn’t do what we could because we weren’t sure it would work?
I think that we both see this subject from the same viewpoint in general. The problem I have is the suggestion that humans can fix it. In this regard I seriously doubt it given the current level of scientific knowledge and technology.
What humans can do now is attempt to slow the process to some extent. Given the current state of all the nations on planet Earth I seriously doubt that any effective attempt at slowing the process is going to happen.
I don’t know if you caught it but yesterday on Dkos there was an diary about the 2nd year of drought the Amazon is suffering.
The diary quoted a study which was started in 2002 where an experiment was done by covering a section of the rainforest with plastic sheeting to simulate drought conditions. The results where dramatic. The first year the top cover trees survived OK. The second year the roots went deeper to find water. In the third year all the top cover trees died and came crashing to the ground. All the flora exposed after the top cover trees died also died within months.
But was really the shocker for scientist was the release of 50% of the Co2 that the trees contained. The article then went on to state that the entire Amazon Basin was past the “tipping point” during this year which is the second year of drought that is under way. Within the next five years almost the entire Amazon Basin will become a desert region and the world will lose the worlds largest Co2 sink.
Another factor which goes largely unreported is the release of the Methane caltrate beds currently underway off of the northeastern seaboard due to the receding artic ice cap which has exposed the methane beds to warmer currents. Grand Bank fishermen have reported huge bubbles of Methane being seen rising to the surface.
This goes reported by media as News that is Odd. What no one gets is that this means the Caltrate beds which are massive and held stable by pressure and temperature (think bubbles trapped in oil under a million square inches of pressure) that as the water temperature warms becomes more fluid (think straight 30 weight oil in below freezing temperature becomes frozen solid but when the temperature rise above the freezing point the oil is then goes from a solid to fluid state.)
The point is that when the Caltrate beds that contain a great deal of Methane become fluid enough to be released all it would take for the entire amount of Methane to be released is a minor seaquake.
Should this occur a massive amount of Methane will be released and within a short time span rise into the ozone layer which would result in an even faster breakdown of the ozone layer and an accelerated retreat of the Artic Ice Cap. It’s a snowball effect after that with each new event producing a 10 to the 10th power effect on the planet.
Both of these events are taken by the scientific community in isolation. A little research on the combined effects of all the changes occurring is just now being started.
The process is past the tipping point where even if every human being stopped every activity that contributed to global warming the process will continue at exponential pace.
The human race has come late to the process the only question that remains is will the human race survive the massive changes the planet is going to go through.
By the time every nation no longer can deny the process and agrees to do something that is more than just paying lip service to the problem it will be way too late. The world is seeing the last of a golden age.
In other words “We’re Totally Screwed”.
The sooner people just accept the fact and deal with it the better the odds become that the human race will survive these massive planet wide changes.
“Fixing it and Stopping it” are meaningless given the context of the problem. Better to think about “Dealing With It”.