The White House, GOP and their MSM allies now attack Democrat candidates, voters and the party as weak on national security by implying that they are all American Taliban. A CNN news anchor called Lamont the “al Qaeda candidate” while a nationally-syndicated columnist argued that Lieberman’s defeat “completes the capture of the Democratic Party by its Taliban wing.” And, Tony Snow and Dick Cheney attempt to deter future votes for Democrats by impugning such voters as unpatriotic weaklings who are refusing to fight terrorists because their will has been broken by al-Qaeda. So, not voting for the GOP and staying the course with Bush is a new definition of terrorist. But, what do you call it when Bush’s policies have actually resulted in the return of al-Qaeda training camps in Pakistan-Afghanistan that are even better equipped and weaponized than before the war in Afghanistan, as reported today? Does that make the Bush team al-qaeda sympathizers or enhancers?
The New York Daily News reports today on the “Qaeda camps surge.” Al-Qaeda training camps are not only back in business, but stronger and better equipped than before the war in Afghanistan. The terrorists are advertising their training camps with “slick new videos” that preach that Muslims should strive toward the “highest knowledge available, like nuclear or biological weapons.” The “appalling scenes” on the videos could be from bin Laden’s training camp in Afghanistan before President Clinton “pulverized it with cruise missiles in August 1998.” But, these videos were likely taped this year at the new, improved training camps located in the border areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan. The dating of the tapes as recent is partially based on the inclusion of a “chilling lecture by Abu Yehia Al-Libi, a Libyan and old Bin Laden crony, who escaped from the U.S. base at Bagram, Afghanistan, in July 2005.”
The new videos also show that al-Qaeda has expanded its intended audience to increase its recruitment potential by containing messages in English, French, Urdu and Arabic.
The new training videos are important because they are used to recruit new members, raise money from Gulf financiers and because the “tapes prove Al Qaeda is training new operatives in a safe place with little fear of being discovered or bombed.” As one expert stated:
“You look at that and you say, wow, there is no difference between today and what they had before 9/11 in Afghanistan.”
But, there is a difference. al-Qaeda has reestablished itself as a stronger terrorist group as evidenced by the “surge of suicide attacks in Afghanistan.” Al-Qaeda now has “sophisticated equipment” and a reporter embedded with US forces at the border indicates that “officers described well-trained opponents outfitted with reliable arms, medical kits, armor-piercing ammunition and Chinese night-vision goggles.” The videos show the terrorist fighters also have “bullet-proof vests and Kalashnikovs with silencers screwed onto the barrel.” So, al-Qaeda now has “new high-tech equipment.”
Actually, there are so many really big differences. Most of the global terrorist activity is traced back to Pakistan, as the recent London airliner plot. The whole purpose of Bush’s global “war on terror” was to capture or kill al-Qaeda to keep America safe. US soldiers have been killed, wounded, maimed and psychologically traumatized. Americans have foolishly surrendered their civil rights because Bush conned them into believing that loss of civil rights was necessary to win the “war on terror.” Indeed, there are many differences. The major difference is that staying the course with Bush will not keep Americans safe. The evidence is piling up that Bush’s policies are enhancing the dangers for Americans. It’s time for the Democrats to present that evidence in an effective manner to the American people, who will then make the wise choice that national security can only be truly achieved if we vote these enhancers out of office.
has bush et al crossing a line into trying to deter voters from voting from Democrats in the midterms by painting not just the candidates and party as American Taliban, but painting anyone who votes for Democrats as unpatriotic weaklings too scared to fight the terrorists. And, now there is more evidence that it is Bush’s policies, not democracy in action, that has enhanced al-qaeda to the national security detriment of the American people.
they’re for us.
bush team is really taking a bold step against political dissent by going after voters and democracy in such a blatant manner. they are desperate and freaked at grass roots opposition, and glad they have the containers.
by the way, did you see seymour hersh article on how bush participated in israeli war against lebanon to clear path for war with iran? the man is crazy beyond belief….
met the publisher of this book… should be in every damn school in America.
Addicted to War
We are in a land of crazy people who lead with fear. There hasn’t been one iota of truth from the WhiteHouse in so long. The Bush Regime = Bastards of War.
just added to my book list, sounds great and exhaustive research done for book. have you read? sounds like it would be great material for diary to spread the word.
Reading it. The accolades for it are incredible. Zinn! Enormous.
I sat next to Frank Dorrel at the CodePink table. I watched his books for a few minutes for him while he went to go check on the speakers.. (at the National VFP convention in Seattle) and he askaed me if I had read it.. I hadn’t so he GAVE me one.
I started reading it Saturday and it gave me literally.. the shakes.
I met people who buy CASES of his books to pass out.
Thanks Janet for the heads up on this book….I’ll have to try and talk my sister into buying this one.
.
Always wondered why the Reagan gang delivered U.S. military spare parts to the Ayatollahs of Iran through their ME proxy state. As the U.S. were overtly supporting Saddam’s military push on Iran, I suppose the U.S. with feet on the ground in Lebanon were a legitimate target for the Iraqi Shiite exiles in Iran.
When you screw up your allegiance in the Middle East by support of terrorists, you get burned once in a while. The latter ‘you’ meaning innocent civilians taking the brunt.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
▼ ▼ ▼ MY DIARY