I was forwarded this special section to the L.A. Times last week by my friend Liz. It’s a wonderful five-part series on how our oceans are being altered each and every day. It took me an afternoon to read through it all, but it’s well worth it. In this time where environmentalism is becoming almost fad like and very vogue with the widespread success of Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth [and if you haven’t seen that yet, what is your major malfunction!] how can the issue be pushed more the the forefront while being taken as deadly serious as it needs to be taken?
The oceans were once thought by scientists to be so vast and so quickly healing that any damage we humans could possibly do would be repaired with no consequence. But looking closer, we’ve all learned otherwise. Our oceans are reverting back to the primordial ooze from whence life as we know it first blossomed. The notion of seeing what our oceans looked like when life as we know it first started to sprout may sound romantic, but it’s a nasty place. A nasty place where many, if not most, marine organisms of today cannot survive.
Part one is an article titled A Primeval Tide of Toxins and discusses a 2.7 million-year-old cyanobacteria causing problems all the way up the food chain from plankton to humans. This ancient cyanobacteria is thriving in the oceans now as they did 2.7 billion years ago in an acidic primordial ooze.
The ancient seas contained large areas with little or no oxygen — anoxic and hypoxic zones that could never have supported sea life as we know it. It was a time when bacteria and jellyfish ruled.
Nancy Rabalais, executive director of the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium, has spent most of her career peering into waters that resemble those of the distant past.
On research dives off the Louisiana coast, she has seen cottony white bacteria coating the seafloor. The sulfurous smell of rotten eggs, from a gas produced by the microbes, has seeped into her mask. The bottom is littered with the ghostly silhouettes of dead crabs, sea stars and other animals.
The cause of death is decaying algae. Fed by millions of tons of fertilizer, human and animal waste, and other farm runoff racing down the Mississippi River, tiny marine plants run riot, die and drift to the bottom. Bacteria then take over. In the process of breaking down the plant matter, they suck the oxygen out of seawater, leaving little or none for fish or other marine life.
Part two is an article titled Sentinels Under Attack about how large marine animals [sea lions, seals, whales of all sizes, dolphins, sea turtles] all succumb to similar fates as they eat the ancient toxic algae. The toxicity builds up through the food chain, just as mercury does. We should all be accustomed to the warning labels on all forms of fish products now with mercury levels becoming a thing we now live with. Little amounts of mercury are present in the tiniest things in the oceans. Those plankton are eaten by larger predators and those predators are eaten by bigger fish up the food chain. And then those larger fish end up on our dinner plate or aluminum can in the pantry; same thing happens with the toxic algae.
As [scientists] watch the oceans disgorge more dead and dying creatures, scientists have come to a disquieting realization: The proliferation of algae, bacteria and other microbes is making the oceans less hospitable to advanced forms of life — those animals most like humans.
“Marine mammals share our waters, eat some of the food we eat and get some of the same diseases we get,” said Paul Sandifer, chief scientist for the Oceans and Human Health Initiative of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
“If environmental conditions are not good for these sentinels of the sea, you can believe it won’t be good for us either,” Sandifer said. “What we allow to flow into the sea will come back to bite us. You can bet on it.”
Parts three through five are just as informative and just as jarring as the first two. The basic notion of these articles is to show how drastically and quickly our oceans are changing and for the worse [for us more contemporary flora and fauna]. The vast bodies of water we never thought could really be harmed by human action because of their resiliecy are dying and we’re quickening the pace with our waste washing straight into them from our inland rivers. We’re causing these cyanobacteria to flourish and cause problems for marine predators up the food chain as the toxic levels compound just as mercury does, toxic fumes stretching several miles inland from beaches causing repertory problems in humans, plastics constantly washing around the oceans and not biodegrading… But it’s all stuff we need to know and it’s all part of a good informative read. The series doesn’t really tell us how we can help reduce waste and fight the toxic blooms. Any experts or well-read citizens of the BMT community have suggestions?
I’ll have to set aside some time to read the whole series. Thanks for the tip. Add this to the melting polar caps and we really have some oceanic problems.
Thanks Albert. The link to the LA Times article is a must read for anyone interested in living on this planet & leaving a, somewhat in remisson hopefully, place for their grandchildren. I know the importance of keeping our oceans clean as the priviliged owner of some reef aquariums.
One thing that is simply mind-boggling is the islands of trash churning about in the Pacific Ocean. One, off the west coast of North America, is twice the size of Texas & growing.
I recv. the LA Times everyday & that is one of the best series ever.
Here`s a little part of my oceans.
http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/9470/highdscn5370dh2.jpg
I knew that trash in the oceans was a big problem, but I didn’t know it was as bad as part four described, let alone that one of them is 2x the size of Texas.
I hope to make it out to the west coast someday, I just hope that it’s in a decent condition by the time I get out there. It would suck to have to take a stroll down the beach in a hazmat suit.
have you heard about the “dead zone” in the waters around Oregon? I think there was a diary on kos about it late last week, but I was busy running around all weekend and didn’t get a chance to read it in depth.
Seems like it is along similar lines…..
not sure of the article that diary pointed to, but the same friend who forwarded me the LA Times series forwarded this story about the failure of commercial fisheries in Oregon and California…
here it is
I guess I should read it now that I found it….
It was also covered closer to home in the News Bucket’s Science Headlines on 27 July:
😉
Since I read the LA Times article what has been going through my mind is the islands of trash. I don`t know that it`s a good idea, but, with an end in view of petroleum, of which plastics are a large byproduct, you`d think a recycling company would be mining the trash out there. At some point it should be cost effective, not that you can put a price on a clean ocean system without which we`re doomed anyway. There could be large solar powered barges just swallowing up those islands of trash for years & still hardly make a dent in the sheer volume of it. They`re making bridges out of plastic that are almost indestructible compared to steel rusting.
In “The Graduate”, plastic was the future. Now the same holds true, it seems, but the future is “plastic from trash”. Housing, schools, cars ect can all be made from plastic but for the conotation of the word itself, which suggests something is cheap &/or cheaply made.
Just saying….
how we can help reduce waste and fight the toxic blooms
A certain level of waste running into the oceans is natural and the ecosystem can handle it. The problem is so much organic waste (from feedlots, megafarms, and sewage plants) and fertilizer runoff end up in our rivers that the seas are having a hard time keeping up.
Add to that the distortions that we’ve caused to marine food chains through overfishing, and we’ve compounded the problem.
In a nutshell, the following things would help a great deal; there may be additional steps but these are all biggies:
Link on Digg 🙂 http://www.digg.com/environment/Five_part_series_on_the_drastic_changes_to_the_Earth_s_oceans