Certainly, he will be called a traitor to Bush. At least, that’s how I see the headlines being spun by the right blogosphere regarding this latest revelation from Mr. Powell that he didn’t resign as Secretary of State, he was fired by Our Dear Leader.
But I think the case can be made that Mr. Powell’s betrayal extends far beyond the bounds of what, if anything, he owed the Royal Bush family. Follow me below the fold as I make the argument that Powell has betrayed us all.
(Cont.)
Powell: Good Soldier/Misguided Loyalist …
ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 2004, eight days after the president he served was elected to a second term, Secretary of State Colin Powell received a telephone call from the White House at his State Department office. The caller was not President Bush but Chief of Staff Andrew Card, and he got right to the point.
“The president would like to make a change,” Card said, using a time-honored formulation that avoided the words “resign” or “fire.” He noted briskly that there had been some discussion of having Powell remain until after Iraqi elections scheduled for the end of January, but that the president had decided to take care of all Cabinet changes sooner rather than later. Bush wanted Powell’s resignation letter dated two days hence, on Friday, November 12, Card said, although the White House expected him to stay at the State Department until his successor was confirmed by the Senate.
I wonder, if like Larry Johnson, Mr. Powell no longer considers himself a Republican. It’s clear he finally decided, in light of the passage of the Shred the Constitution and Proclaim George Bush King Military Commissions Act, one which he ardently opposed in his testimony in the Senate (for which he was used once again by Bush and McCain) that the time for fealty to Bush the Younger was over.
Too bad he waited so long. This might have done some good back in 2004 when it mattered.
… or Powell, Dishonorable Coward and Traitor?
Some consider Mr. Powell the epitome of a Good Soldier, a man loyal to his commanders even when they were not loyal to him. A man who refused to speak out against his President because he felt honor bound to remain loyal despite all the insults, humiliations and indignity heaped upon him by the President and the Cheney/Rumsfeld Cabal.
Let me just say that I consider Mr Powell to be the worst sort of soldier. He put his duty to his commander above his duty to his country. When he learned that he had been sold a pack of lies to present to the UN in order to convince the American public of the necessity for invading Iraq, he should have quit and given his reasons then and there. Why? Because no one swears an outh to the President. But soldiers, and yes, the Secretary of State, do swear an oath to defend the Constitution:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
Colin Powell failed to do his duty. As Secretary of State, as a soldier, and as a man. Unlike former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill, who told the truth about Bush’s lies and machinations once he resigned, Powell remained silent.
He said nothing publicly against the Bush adminsitration, either because he didn’t want his reputation sullied among his Beltway friends or because he was afraid what being smeared by the White House would do to his lecture fee income. Either way, he has acted dishonorably in my view.
By not speaking out against this rogue President and his administration, by not resigning in protest once it became apparent he had been duped about Iraq’s WMD, by not pulling the wool away from the eyes of a misled and lied to American citizenry who were railroaded into supporting a criminal war of aggression, he committed his greatest offense. Whether out of misguided sense of loyalty or from cowardice, Mr. Powell has dishonored himself personally and professionally, and betrayed his oath to defend the Constitution.
In years to come, no one should remember Mr. Powell as the faithful, loyal soldier, which is the image he has always tried to portray to the media. He should be remembered, instead, as a man who failed to live up to his oath of office. A man who put loyalty to his boss over loyalty to his country. A man who betrayed us all in order to serve an incompetent, ruthless and power-mad President.
In short, he should be remembered as a traitor to the United States of America. He sold us out so that he could pretend to be a man of honor. And in the years to come, we will all pay the price for his dereliction of duty.
Steven, I know it would be an overstatement on my part to claim that great minds think alike, but I checked several times to see if anyone had written about this, and not seeing anything, wrote a short diary.
I think if the fact that Bush fired Powell actually gets any traction, especially on the heels of the revelations in Woodward’s book, this could make their plans for an attack on Iran a bit more difficult. That’s my take on things. Wonder what you think???
I suspect one reason Powell is coming forward now is to curtail an attack on Iran. That’s being generous to him, though. He tried to leak information through Wilkerson but that didn’t work well enough to sidetrack the Iran plans, so he and his friends in the military who oppose another preemptive war may have decided it was time for Powell to speak out more directly. That’s the little angel on my shoulder talking.
The little devil on my other shoulder thinks this is just Powell’s way of getting payback.
Ps. Sorry I missed your diary. I havfe expanded this one a little bit to make the title fit the theme of the post better. And also because I feel we have good reason to see Mr. Powell as a cowardly traitor. Unlike Paul O’Neill who spoke out against the Bush war plans for Iraqafter he resigned, Powell said nothing publicly, either because he didn’t wnt his reputation sullied among his Beltway friends or because he was afraid what being smeared by the White House would do to his lecture fee income. Either way, he has acted dishonorably in my view.
He could have resigned instead of continuing in the U.N., convincing the American public with garbage he didn’t believe. Years later, he admitted
He will be remembered as the Secretary of State who refused to put his finger in the Iraq dike when it counted.
Now available in ORANGE
that Colin Powell is an honest, intelligent, courageous and moderate man.
He stayed behind the lines and fought for what he believed the only way he knew how. Did he “succeed”? We will never know. He fought a delaying action, and he did so as something of a spy. A mole for the other side. A mole for moderation. What would have happened if he did NOT stay in office as long as he did? No one can accurately say.
Was he right in his choice tactical and strategic goals? Again, no one can say.
Did he succeed in his efforts? This cannot be gauged either.
But I will tell you one thing. No…I will tell you two things.
1-He was courageous under fire. He did his duty as he saw it.
and
2-He does not deserve our calumny. There is PLENTY of blame to be assigned. Let him be. I would look at him as he went through his final tour of duty and think “How does this man stand up under pressure of this sort?”
He is a better man than most of us.
Cut him a break.
AG
Arthur is this snark?
If it’s not, Arthur needs to read about how Colin Powell helped coverup for the massacre at My Lai during the Vietnam War, among his other travesties.
Thanks for bring up My Lai. If someone hadn’t by now I would have. This man deserves nothing from us. Not a damn thing.
I have read this, Lisa.
He made a decision a long. long while ago that he was a military man, and his nature is that of a diplomat. he did what his talents allowed, and I believe he is a man of conscience.
I will say it again.
Was he right in his choice of tactical and strategic goals? No one can say.
Yui cannot say and neither can I.
He did his duty as he saw it.
Do NOT place him in the same company with dishonorable men like Dick Cheney and George W. Bush.
He came up on the hard streets of Harlem during the pre-civil rights era. He saw an opportunity in the military and he took it. And he was an honorable soldier right to the end.
Did he participate in a cover-up of My Lai?
Possibly.
Did he participate to some degree in the dishonest run-up to the Iraq War?
Yes.
Was he trying all the while to be whatever voice of reason his position allowed?
I’ll bet you that he was.
Should he have simply resigned and gone into civilian service? The private sector?
Maybe.
Would things have been better if he had?
I doubt it.
I think that they would have been worse.
He is one of only a very few people who have been in important positions in this country both in the military and as a civilian…Jimmy Carter would be another and so would be Dwight Eisenhower, but the line thins out behind them… who I would approach with a clear conscience, shake their hand and thank them for their service to this country.
That’s my look at it anyway.
You are welcome to yours.
AG
No.
AG
It is not snark.
AG
He is the 21st Century “Man with Out a Country”. A wired “Ancient Mariner” who forsaken his own Powell Doctrine and the American people to enable his boss and brought on the greatest strategic debacle in America’s History.
Ron Kovich showed up at a Powell book signing to remind journalists and fans present of the dangers of seeing Powell as a good guy:
Source.
See Robert Parry’s series of articles on Colin Powell.
Given the patterns of GOP deception, I have to wonder if Powell is being used to push small “revelations” in order to distract from bigger ones. Much the way McCain is always available to soothe the populace by “winning” meaningless “compromises”.
At the very least this is just another fight among thieves. Powell deserves nothing for his too-little too-late turnabout. There was never any mystery about what Bush/Cheney are, or about their motives. If Powell was that blind to the obvious, even after knowingly spreading the lies he was ordered to spread, he’s much dumber than I ever could have imagined.
I think this just about says it all for me, anyhow. My views have not changed, except for the worst of matters. Betrayed is not how I feel, but adding this to the other emotions I have had going on now for 6+ years, I am so angry. NO forgiveness is coming from me! This crime is not forgivable….for him or anyone. He know what to do, and he did not do one damn thing.
Powell’s betrayal is in many ways worse than that of the insane neocons whose interests he wound up serving. Atleast we knew where they were headed with their lunatic agenda. But Powell’s part in this macabre scam as the “most respected, level headed, voice of reason” guy, who turned at the precise moment to carry the lie to the public and in so doing cement the deal for the invasion, this is a disgrace beyond my ability to describe in words.
Pat Lang has an interesting perspective on Powell here.
Yes
Ego
Thanks for the reference
Meanwhile, what does the Cowardly Lion have to say about the new detainee torture legislation?