My previous post discussed the anticipated funding cuts directed at the National Wildlife Refuge system, administered by the Fish and Wildlife Service. Comprised of 545 separate refuges, it encompasses some 96 million acres. Visitors are estimated at 40 million per year.
Now, unilaterally, and without any congressional input, President Bush has ordered a 10 percent cutback in system funding.
WASHINGTON, DC, November 1, 2006 (ENS) – The Bush administration has ordered a 10 percent across-the-board cutback in funding for the National Wildlife Refuge System, leaving dozens of refuges without any assigned staff, according to agency documents released today by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, PEER.
The Refuge System, a part of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, will see declining budgets through 2011 under the Bush plan, despite significant increases in the number of refuges, visitors and an array of other costs, according to PEER, a national association of government employees in natural resources agencies.
PEER says that since Congress has yet to act on the Fish and Wildlife Service budget for FY 2007, the Bush administration is implementing the cuts without waiting for Congressional approval.
Sure, why involve Congress? Things could just get far too complicated. Congress is really just a rubberstamp for excutive whim anyway, right? Better to just do the job quickly and without any oversight.
And though the $380 million budget will decrease “moderately”, the expenditures fail to acknowledge that 17 new refuges have been added since 2001.
The southeast will be hardest hit.
The Southeast Region, with the largest number of refuges, 128, will eliminate approximately 80 staff positions, leaving 43 of its refuges with no staff at all, a condition the agency calls “Preservation Status.”
Grady Hocutt of PEER:
“Make no mistake about it – this is the first stage in dismantling the National Wildlife Refuge System,” said Grady Hocutt, a former long-time refuge manager who directs the PEER refuge program. “It took a century to build this network of wildlife sanctuaries into the envy of the world but much of that work is being undone in just this decade.”
“Redirecting a tiny fraction of what audits show is wasted or stolen in Iraq would allow for full funding of all refuge system needs,” added Hocutt, noting that the U.S. is spending an estimated $177 million per day in Iraq.”
PEER can be found here.
Funding cuts will drastically hinder outreach programs. This will likely lessen public support of the system.
Just as was done was the National Forest sell off, I predict that the plans are to sell these lands to private developers. I recall very well as a kid that lands were condemned for the Land Between the Lakes National Recreation Area – which includes a wildlife refuge area. Families were hard hit, paid not much for their land, many of whom had been removed from their land once during the depression-era construction of the TVA-built Kentucky Lake. However, they were promised that this land would be held as wilderness and recreation area in perpetuity. Never developed. Used solely for camping, outdoor-wildlife education, etc.
Under Bush, plans were made to sell some of the most desirable land for development – building condos, golf courses, exclusive homes on property forcibly vacated in the late 1960’s. The local people were understandably furious, and partially succeeded in holding off some of this land grab.
I strongly believe that the wildlife refuges are a low-hanging fruit targeted for private acquisition. The stated reasons will be lack of use (hard to use refuges that are closed), and income. Bull. And most of this will take place between elections. From November 8 through about Feb of 2007. Mark it down, we will see these places pass forever into private hands.