John Bolton was an easy scapegoat for US Diplomacy. He had lied under oath about pushing fake evidence to support the Iraq war, and his record at the UN was a case study in heartlessness and paranoia. And now the International Community won’t have John Bolton to kick around anymore.
The only problem is that the International Community, with the exception of the few diplomats who actually had to work with the Walrus, didn’t ever want to kick around John Bolton. They wanted to welcome the US at the bargaining table, they wanted a strong US role at the United Nations, and they wanted a country with a cohesive, comprehensible, and consistant international policy.
John Bolton was a symptom of the Bush Foreign Policy, not a cause. The administration official who has overseen this collapse in its entirety is Condoleeza Rice. If anyone should resign, it should be Condi.
Condi Rice has been, by far, the worst Secretary of State in a long time. Leaving her tenure as the National Security Advisor alone, when she advised the US into Iraq, her diplomatic efforts have been disastrous on every front.
International support for the Iraq mission has declined. When she was appointed in 2004, W. kissed her on the cheek and said:
“In Dr. Rice, the world will see the strength, the grace and the decency of our country…The nation needs her.”
It is the whole world, however, not just the US that needs a Secretary of State. Since her appointment, the US has:
- Refused to censure or condemn the political repression taking place in Russia. Most recently, a former KGB operative and current dissident was assassinated in London.
- Seen the following members of the “coalition of the willing” disappear: Poland, Italy, Ukraine, Netherlands, Tonga. The UK and South Kirea have also indicated that they are considering withdrawal, which would leave only two countries with over 1,000 troops in Iraq: the US and Australia.
- Helped secure a potentially catastrophic and definitely illegal agreement to sell nuclear fuel and equipment to India, violating non-proliferation agreements and setting a poor standard for other nuclear powers.
- Failed to prevent the testing of a nuclear weapon in North Korea.
- Failed to halt the genocide in Darfur.
- Witnessed the rise of China as a serious diplomatic power in the absence of a strong US diplomatic presence in East Asia.
- Failed to halt the political destabilazation of Lebanon.
If Rumsfeld is so clearly accountable for the debacle that is Iraq, it is time to begin asking why Condi is not accountable for the plummeting international opinion of the United States. Of course, both failures can be attributable to the President, but his cabinet must also be held accountable.
It’s fine and good to rejoice in the demise of John Bolton, a true failure of a diplomat. But we must also begin looking up the ladder, for, when it comes to bringing America’s image back from the depths to which it has sunk, there are clearly bigger problems than one ornery walrus.
This is my first Booman diary, feedback appreciated.
Welcome to the Frog Pond. Keep this up and we just might have to keep reading your diaries. 🙂
Thanks, Omir. I’m fairly regular at DKos but I’ve been lurking at Booman for a while. Looking forward to more reading and writing.
I’m trying to think of an appropriate rejoinder about rice… but the thought of walrus meat just keeps grossing me out, rice or no rice.
I do like rice, but I can’t stand Rice. She’s another fine example of a miserable failure. heckuvajob.
Thanks for reminding us. Hopefully, you’ve started a movement which will culminate in her removal.
Thanks for sharing, and I hope to see more of your writing here.
I hope so. It’s absolutely ridiculous that there isn’t a more serious discussion about holding this failure of a secretary to account for the disastrous state of US foreign policy.
What I will never understand is why a bright, talented person such as Rice allows herself to be a marionette for Bush’s braintrust. She’s had opportunities to shape better policies, but shows no signs of having made any personal contribution to stop, alter, or even slow the accretion of stupid decisions made by this administration. If there’s a ranking of Secretaries of State – and there must be sometime – she’s going to be way down the line.
Welcome to BT, zenbowl. Hope you’ll come back, and share your writing here again.
Hi Kid-
My understanding from colleagues who knew her at Stanford is that Condi really isn’t that bright. “Nothing special” was the description that I heard quite often. She’s got a solid foundation of fact, but she doesn’t have, as GHWB would say, that vision thing.
Thanks for your warm welcome.
Welcome zen. good to have you here and a good diary to boot. Am looking forward to more of the same. hugs
I think rice in either fashion is good when given the right compliment foods or ppl that can and should improve the acutal rice…;o)
Thanks Brenda.
I think you’re right in that Condi would be a more capable Sec State if she was given better policies, but how we judge people (and food) isn’t how they can be improved by others. That’s more of a commentary on the spices and seasonings than it is of the food itself.
Welcome aboard zen… about my only critical comment is an unpopular one: what’s up with the incessant Russia bashing from the lefty blogosphere?
Pax
Hi Soj-
For my part, any criticism of Russia is a commentary on how hopeful I was for that nation after a few years of disbelief following the cold war.
To see the halls of democracy being turned into a den of corruption is as upsetting in Moscow as it is in Washington. That said, I’m still more optimistic about the future of Russia than China.
Cheers-
zb