So, whatever happened to the notion that “Elections have consequences”? George W. Bush, after his narrow “victory” over John Kerry in 2004, claimed that he had a mandate to press forward with his agenda, rather than trying to work in a more bipartisan manner. You know, “Reach across the aisle”? Apparently that is only considered an admirable trait when it’s Democrats that are in power.  

The midterm elections have been described by many as being driven largely by public dissatisfaction with the war in Iraq. From those elections to any public opinion poll I’ve seen, the message from the American public has been a resounding “No!” to the Bush administration’s strategy in Iraq.  Bush’s response has been the equivalent of sticking his fingers in his ears and yelling “La la la la la!”

For anyone who is not aware of this…  

Volunteers will host actions in cities and towns across the country within 24 hours of the president’s speech with a simple message: “America says NO more troops in Iraq!”

I will be the first to admit that I am tired of trying to oppose a president who is so bound and determined to ignore and isolate any voices outside of his small circle of “yes men” (and women). Do I believe that we can change his mind on the escalation of the war in Iraq, announced last night in a special address to the nation? Sadly, no.

But the world is watching us, and I think it would be a sad commentary on American apathy if these rallies were sparsely attended. What does that say to people in other nations (who used to hold our country in such high regard) if our response to Bush acting in direct opposition to our will, is, “Yeah, whatever.”

Click here to find a  vigil or rally in your area.