(Editor’s note: Hyphen inserted in title for those unfamiliar with the Latin term ‘persona non grata’ and for those who speak Portugese or who are unfamiliar with the DLC.)
How do you know when a Democrat is really not on your side? There are many ways, and the voting record is not always the best indicator. But I don’t know that I have ever seen a better indicator than the following:
In 1996, [Rep. Ellen] Tauscher [D-CA-10] ran for Congress as a pro-business, pro-environment, pro-military centrist against Bill Baker, a conservative Republican she portrayed as too far right for his suburban swing district. Pelosi supported her, and she won. But when Pelosi ran for whip, Tauscher supported moderate Hoyer, a close friend. And later in 2001, Tauscher accused Pelosi and her allies in the California Senate of redrawing her congressional district as payback. The new district was much more Democratic, which made it a safer seat for the party, but not necessarily for Tauscher — unless she followed Pelosi’s lead.
Let’s go over this slowly. Ellen Tauscher’s 10th district was redrawn in 2001 to make it much more Democratic, and Tauscher interpreted this as punishment for supporting Steny Hoyer over Nancy Pelosi for minority whip.
I don’t know how much clearer it could be that Ellen Tauscher does not have our best interests at heart. That’s why the netroots is mobilizing to defeat her.
Ellen Tauscher Weekly
Dump Ellen Tauscher
Working For Us PAC
Oh yeah.
She is going DOWN like a bowling pin.
Not if the Washington Post has any say in the matter. She is right there on their Mt. Rushmore with Lieberman, McCain, and Harold Ford Jr.
Are you calling her a cunt?
Uhh…no.
Cona = cunt in Portuguese
I’m not fluent in that language.
what’s the origin?
the word ‘persona’.
I think you mean “Mount Turdmore”.
And so far as what the Post wants, these are the same ding-a-lings that sent broder out on monday to tell us Bush is making a comeback.
so I don’t know the phrase “persona non grata”… perhaps I UNDERSTAND “non grata” is ALSO a phrase on its own.
You were given a chance to correct by our gentle and non-accusatory question, you are not one of those that has to give a passive aggressive dig with simple corrections, are you?
That’s non-accusatory?
Anyone can have a misimpression and ask a question.
Let me ask you if you think this is a reasonable response to your confusion and my reaction to it (which was direct and succinct and required no ‘correction’ on my part).
or, how about this one?
That’s my paparazzi fan club busy at work. When they’re not accusing me of racism, they’re piggybacking on your questions to insult me.
I don’t want to get caught up in any of these misunderstandings, BUT…
DUDE. I Know what “persona non grata” means!!!
You callin’ me DUMB or somethin’?
I read it with a hard “c” because I saw it in Portuguese. Thass all.
: )
I’d take it offline.
well, I assumed you were responding to MSOC and/or I.
The reasons you give for my confusion just don’t pertain.
I’m well aware there are people that are not particularly forgiving of any mistake of yours… but if I say something and you respond to them it’ll be hard for me to know the difference.
i’d have to make a mistake for any of this to be remotely interesting. I can’t account for morons.