So if the dems are truly going to pull out the earwax candles and slowly extricate that logjam of wax in the repubs ears, why can’t they do a little investigation on our buddy Jeff Gannon/Guckert? If it takes a blow job to get an impeachment (apparently treason, malfeasance in office, lying to congress and the public just doesn’t qualify) then let’s find out who Jeff was blowing off when he was visiting. Cause his visits didn’t necessarily target the WH press conferences.
Follow me into conjectureland:
Now I cannot find the original diary that listed Gannon’s visits to the WH, but it was a fascinating listing because WHO he visited was not listed. So we were (and are) left with speculation about who Jeff’s WH sponsor was (and probably IS). What if it were Rove that Jeffy was tangoing with? Would that change the equation for the kool-aid crowd? You know, the “gayness” of it all? Would the kool-aid drinkers just be glad it was Rove and not the presnit? Or would the mere gay thing so close to the presnit cause waves of distress amongst the sheep? I certainly hope so. I can’t see the vp or Libby in the role of supplicant to Gannon’s butch self, but that probably is a bias based not on fact but on the fact that they are married. Rove, too, has been married but on and off.
Anyway, my point is this: if it takes a blow job to get rid of Bush, let us find out who has done the blowing to whom in that there WH. Then we can ask Bush to ‘splain why he has tolerated such behavior. (Assuming it wasn’t he, himself, getting the lathering!)
Is there a dem who might (maybe under pretext of looking at Abramoff’s visits) go exploring for connections? Things are heating up anyway. Lets throw in a few more charcoal briquets!
