Barack Obama is getting a lot of flak.
Obama has sparked concern among Jewish leaders over phrases and remarks not amenable to Israel’s most aggressive supporters.
“His attack on cynicism, and another line about the ‘cycle of violence’ struck hard-line supporters of Israel as suggesting that the Israeli and Palestinian sides are equally to blame – something Obama himself has rejected in other, prepared remarks,” writes Politico columnist Ben Smith. “Phrases like ‘cycle of violence’ and – worse still – pledges to be ‘even-handed’ are freighted with meaning in that context, and a second-hand report in January from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency in January that Obama had once pledged to be ‘even-handed’ suggested to some Jewish critics that he was taking the Palestinian side.”
Obama has been regularly voted “worst for Israel” among all of the American presidential candidates in the liberal Israeli newspaper Haaretz.
“Obama ‘fails to understand the totalitarian politics and sensibilities of the folks over there, who are not well meaning,’ said E.J. Kessler, a New York Post editor who’s a longtime observer of American-Jewish politics” writes Smith. “‘His approach will appeal to a lot of lefty Jews, but it won’t appeal to the serious players,’ she said, referring to the better-organized and better funded groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Council, AIPAC, at whose conference Obama put in an appearance earlier this month.”
Obama has recruited Jewish Florida Congressman Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL), who has endorsed Obama’s campaign, to allay concerns in the jewish community. “What has always struck me about Senator Obama – and this is one of the reasons that I have endorsed his candidacy for president – is that a love for Israel and a desire to keep the Jewish people secure is evident not just in his work, but also in his heart,” wrote Wexler in an e-mail to Jewish leaders.
Obama’s Iraq war position and its implications for dealing with Iran further complicates his relationship with pro-Israel activists, writes Smith.
“If you’re serious of confronting the regime of Iran and Ahmadinejad and his plans for mass murder then you have to look at the map and say how do we do this – what is the only way that we do this, what is the most practical way to do this,” Norpac leader Ben Chouake is quoted as saying. Norpac recently circulated an email soliciting donations to any six candidates from both parties, but excluded Obama from the list.
So, there are ‘lefty Jews’ and then there are ‘serious players’. I see. Shall we take a look at the breakdown?
Jewish Americans are more strongly opposed to the Iraq war than any other major religious group in the United States, a new Gallup Poll found.
The Gallup Organization combined data from the last two-plus years measuring the support or lack thereof for the Iraq war. Overall, 52 percent of Americans say the United States made a mistake to invade Iraq and 46 percent favored the war by saying it did not make a mistake.
Broken down into religious groups, 77 percent of Jews say the war is a mistake and 21 percent say it is not…
Further data revealed that Jewish Democrats are even more opposed to the war and the average American Jew, even those who are Republicans, opposes the war.
So, Obama is supposed to worry about how ‘serious players’ feel about him even though he shares the same sentiments as the vast majority of American Jews?
This is what passes for journalism.
…some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time.
You can’t please the AIPAC fanatics ANY of the time. Fuck them and the horse they rode in on. The AIPAC influence on American foreign policy is one of the many malignancies that is bringing the US to a disastrous end in world affairs.
American Israel Public Affairs Committee
The “Serious Players”? In other words, those winsome cutups who brought us the war in Iraq and the destruction of the United States.
I’ll stick with the lefty Jews.
for “New York money”
Also known as Hillarynomics…
Precisely. And unlike so many in this thread, Obama won’t tell them to shove it. He’ll adjust his language and court those “serious players” because elections are about money; not the electorate.
I’m not sure why Obama’s being questioned on this as his paper supporting Israel has all the right words and talking points that AIPAC wanted to hear. And his support for Israel invading Lebanon was all they could have wished for also….to the point that he believed there should be no cease fire until Israel got the job done-which I found absolutely disgusting. And he repeated the same crap/lies about Hezbollah firing rockets into Israel first so they had every right to defend themselves..same old bullshit.
. . .there was a time when Black people and Jewish people in America had an alignment centered around human rights, equality, justice, economic parity, and peace?
along came Israel . . .
it is certainly very much more complicated than that:
there was the Holocaust,
the realization of civil rights progress in the USA,
the rise of the industrial-military complex,
newer, subtler fascism….
This is sickening. The question of whether a political candidate is “good for Israel” would be a legitimate question in an Israeli election. It is not a legitimate concern in an American election. That millions of dollars are being directed by Israeli interests to manipulate both our elections and our media is what is keeping is from seriously discussing an even more important question: is Israel good for America?
If this is going to continue, we need to think seriously about organizing PACs of our own in Jerusalem. Maybe we can get some Israeli leaders elected who won’t use us to fight their proxy wars.
It really has become bizarre how all politicians here have to have the litmus test of ‘being good for Israel’ on their resume.
To be fair, it’s not totally Israel’s fault. They’re fighting a foredoomed battle for their own survival, and were I an Israeli, I’d probably be trying to subvert the US government as well. It’s our own neocons and other domestic foreign policy hawks — who are by no means Israelis or even mainly Jews — who transform Jerusalem’s wishes into our flag-draped caskets.
It’s unfortunate that knee-jerk claims of anti-Semitism are the standard response to any criticism of American submission to Likudnik nutjobs. There are probably a hundred times as many American Christian evangelicals who are happily selling out their country in the deliberate pursuit of Armageddon as there are pro-Israel American Jews with divided loyalties.
I’m definitely not a serious player.
It is the right wing Jews who are not the serious players they are pretty much astroturfing when the claim to speak for any community. Frankly it pisses me off when I hear some arrogant conservative claiming to speak for Jews in their support for some neo-con extremist position or candidate. Jews are one of the most reliably liberal demographics out there. Since Hoover, 70% to 90% of Jews have voted democratic in most presidential election, and all of Bush’s pandering to AIPAC allowed him to crow over a shift from 79% for Gore to 76% for Kerry.
If “serious” means money then AIPAC should shove their wallets where the sun doesn’t shine. When the Republicans talk about New York Liberals or Hollywood liberals they are really talking in code about Jews, and rich ones at that (dog whistle politics akin to “states rights”=anti-civil rights). I only found guesses on money, but I am fairly certain that AIPAC only gets more press because they are more organised and more conservative about it.
Lefty-Jew is the default in America, for every Lieberman there are three of us. There are Boxers, and Feingolds, and Waxmans.
Domestically, the Jews aren’t players at all. It’s the apocalyptic fantasies of Christian evangelicals and the transnational imperial ambitions of the neocons that are driving this monster.
Jews are anything but stupid. That Fundy mythology about “when all of Israel is returned to the Jews…” ends with “and then the Jews all become Christians or die…” right before they leave their clothes and float up. They understand that they are being used.
Robert Wexler (D, Boca Raton) represents the Jewish community as well as anyone. He’s been to Israel at least 23 times in his tenure. He has said very eloquently that the war in Iraq is very, very bad for Israel.
It’s time that the far-right minority in Israel were recognized for what they are, and their input filed.
I just can’t let this pass. I have to say Wexler is a good sport and did the best Better Know a District on Colbert.
When I spoke to him, I said: “Let me shake the hand of the man who shook Colbert’s hand!” He’s first rate. (I heard him actually say he refused receptions that the president would attend because Bush made him nauseous.)
I would think he already knows this and doesn’t spend time worrying about articles like this. If he did he would be spending all his time worrying.
press is just looking for anything they can to stir things up like pushing Clinton vs Obama (though now it looks like this is going to be for real as Obama cuts into Queen Hillary’s lead).