.
WASHINGTON D.C. (AP) – President Bush named Republican fundraiser Sam Fox as U.S. ambassador to Belgium, using a maneuver that allowed him to bypass Congress, where Democrats had derailed Fox’s nomination.
The appointment, made while lawmakers were out of town on spring break, prompted angry rebukes from Democrats, who said Bush’s action may even be illegal.
Democrats had denounced Fox for his donation to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth during the 2004 presidential campaign. The group’s TV ads, which claimed that Sen. John Kerry exaggerated his military record in Vietnam, were viewed as a major factor in the Massachusetts Democrat’s election loss.
Recognizing Fox did not have the votes to obtain Senate confirmation in the Foreign Relations Committee, Bush withdrew the nomination last week. On Wednesday, with the Senate on a one-week break, the president used his power to make recess appointments to put Fox in the job without Senate confirmation. This means Fox can remain ambassador until the end of the next session of Congress, effectively through the end of the Bush presidency.
Fox, a 77-year-old St. Louis businessman, gave $50,000 to the Swift Boat group. He is national chairman of the Jewish Republican Coalition and was dubbed a “ranger” by Bush’s 2004 campaign for raising at least $200,000. He is founder and chairman of the Clayton, Mo.-based Harbour Group, which specializes in the takeover of manufacturing companies.
My earlier diary – Swiftboater Appointee as Ambassador to Belgium ¶ Last Throes?
Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said he plans to ask the Government Accountability Office to issue an opinion on whether the recess appointment is legal.
Recess appointments are intended to give the president flexibility if Congress is out for a lengthy period of time, such as the four-week adjournment in summer. But Dodd said the law was not intended to circumvent lawmakers’ approval.
“This is really now taking the recess appointment vehicle and abusing this beyond anyone’s imagination,” said Dodd, a candidate for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination. “This is a travesty.”
Presidents since George Washington have made appointments during congressional recesses to fill positions in the executive and judicial branches. Bush has used the authority more frequently than some — but not all — of his most recent predecessors, making 171 so far, compared with 140 for President Clinton over two terms, 77 by his father in one term and 243 by President Reagan during two terms.
maybe the fox fucked up….this one may not pass muster.
from Think Progress:
and more from mary ann akers @ wapo:
one more nail in the coffin…not that it’s needed…stock up on popcorn Oui…shaping up to be an interesting spring
ITMF’sA
This is probably the perfect test of the cajones of the Senate right now. It’s not important to world peace. They can’t even pay the guy. But it is such a potent symbol of Bush’s arrogance that it makes the perfect test.
There are at least 3 reasons why this may be illegal. What’s important is to push it to the SCOTUS limit. Even if they decide for Bush, they illustrate the importance of SCOTUS in political campaigns. And if they slap him down, it will give them good practice.
So Bush’s arrogance has given the Dems another great issue, and this one is a no harm/no foul path to success, one way or another.
I can only see where its illegal to accept services for a job that has a statuatory salary attached to it.
Please explain to me the other 2 reasons this may be illegal. Thanks!
Could you please refrain from sending your waste to Europe? We cannot recycle this one.
Thanks