So-called moderate Republicans were almost wiped out of the mid-Atlantic and New England in the 2006 midterm elections. Now the remaining ‘moderates’ are singing another tune, and claiming they always wanted to be moderate, but the big bad Republican leadership wouldn’t let them. Case in point: Mike Ferguson (R-NJ-07).
If the Democratic ascendance on Capitol Hill was supposed to usher in dark days for Republicans, it is hard to tell from talking to moderate ones like Mike Ferguson, who represents a suburban district in central New Jersey.
As the new Democrat-led House rushed to complete its business before adjourning for spring break this week, Representative Ferguson was marveling at the many bills that had been passed in Congress’s first 100 days, including one that would make it easier for unions to organize and another that would increase the minimum wage.
“Under the Republican majority, those bills would have never gotten to the floor,” he explained before heading back to his district. “Now they have been brought to the floor, and I’ve voted for them.”
Mr. Ferguson’s enthusiasm captures a peculiar political reality in the Capitol: many Republicans from swing districts in the Northeast are finding that life under Democratic rule has its advantages.
During the 12 years that Republicans controlled the House, moderate Republicans were the stepchildren of their party, expected to vote with their conservative leadership on crucial issues, even if it meant taking positions that could anger centrist voters back home.
In fact, the Democrats made some of their deepest inroads last year in the Northeast. A total of 10 Republican incumbents in the House were defeated in four states — New Hampshire, Connecticut, New York and Pennsylvania — where the challengers aggressively tried to tie the incumbents to President Bush and his conservative allies on the Hill.
Now, with those losses still fresh in their minds, Republican moderates remaining in the House are vowing to pursue their centrist positions more assertively, even if it means endorsing Democratic initiatives.
In particular, the GOP moderates are interested in working with the Democrats on global warming. And they want to build a reputation for bipartisanship to distance themselves from George W. Bush. Ironically, their cooperation gives us more power but makes them harder to beat.
The best thing for these Republicans would be a Guiliani presidential run. Romney would work for them too. The last thing they need is another southern culture candidate that runs on an ultra-partisan platform. McCain seem unable to articulate the clean-break (from Bush/DeLayism) that the moderates need to survive.
In essence the moderate republicans were doing what was in the best interest of their party and not those people who live in their district. What the GOP moderates are trying to say is “we really didn’t give a shit about the people who voted us into office. We vote the way Karl and Delay told us too..”My commanding officer gave me an order and I followed it.”
no tears here for them, not even those fake ones..
Given the magnitude of the damage done to this nation, I want only to see the equivalent of our own Nuremberg trials so these folks can try out their “Ve vass only following orders” defense. They’ve already admitted to committing treason against the nation in this reporting. Only the sentence awaits.
.
Dutch large corporations with US ties have donated large sums of money into the political campaign of Republicans during last years Congressional elections. Dutch newspaper NRC Handelsblad published an article tonight with the headline: “Ideology plays no role by US donations”.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
Boo-hoo.
I say fuck ’em.
The term “moderate republican” still includes the word “republican,” and as far as I’m concerned we need to take the republican party, drive a stake through its heart, stuff its mouth full of garlic, and bury it, face down, deep under running water.
The only “moderate republican” I’m even slightly interested in hearing about is one who bucked the leadership at every opportunity, beginning in 1994. Any member of the repub caucus who voted in folks like Delay, voted for Clinton’s impeachment, voted for any of their rammed-down-the-throat rules and bills, gets nothing from me beside my abiding contempt.
In Maine, we call ’em Rockefeller Republicans.
Neither Collins or Snowe[job] have the right to incessantly invoke the voice of the late Margaret Chase Smith.
Hardly.
What’s important is to connect the dots, re: their campaign contributions.
(General Dynamics owns Bath Iron Works, BTW–one of Maine’s largest employers).
Charles Bass — ex-GOP congressman from New Hampshire — wrote a similar piece today in the Boston Globe.
I’m partisan enough to say, unfortunately it is pretty smart. But not, I suspect smart enough after Bush, to undo Dem hegemony in the northeast.
We’re busy over @Turn Maine Blue, re: taking out not-so-moderate Suzie-Q Collins.
Anyone from Maine who stops by here…pls. send ’em over?
I’d appreciate some assistance, as Maine Dems (generally speaking) don’t blog.
Thanks!
P.S. No, Tom Allen hasn’t announced as yet…doesn’t need to. Collins has taken some heat this past week in the MSM (thanks to a a Nor’Easter, which placed folks inside for two days–those who had power, watched TV).
Chellie Pingree has announced her candidacy for Tom’s CD#1 Congressional seat; and she’s doing well on our TMB ActBlue page (w/a couple of blog threads & a few emails tossed around the internets).
We’re trying, folks–Maine is more purplish than not, BTW (2nd CD is mucho more conservative).