The Chicago Council of Global Affairs has done a study (.pdf) of world opinion (including American) about the United States role in foreign policy and the international order. There are many interesting findings, but let’s start with what they learned about American attitudes.
Americans also reject the idea that the United States should be the preeminent world leader and feel that it too often plays the role of world policeman. Most Americans (75%) believe the United States should do its share to solve world problems together with other countries. Very few support the idea that the United States should either withdraw from most international efforts (12%) or remain the preeminent world leader (10%) in solving international problems. The United States is also among the countries most convinced that “United States is playing the role of world policeman more than it should be” (76%). Only 21 percent disagree. Nearly the same number (75%) rejects the idea that the United States has an obligation to fulfill the role of world policeman and “fight violations of international law and aggression wherever they occur.” Only 22 percent believe the United States has this responsibility. However a majority of Americans feel the United States should either maintain its current number of overseas bases (53%) or increase them (15%). Twenty-seven percent think the United States should reduce its military presence and have fewer bases in foreign countries.
Here we see a basic dichotomy. While three-quarters of Americans think the United States is acting too much as a world-policeman and rejects the idea that we have any obligation to maintain order, 68% of the people think we should either maintain or increase our overseas military basing. It’s looks like Americans like our strong and forward positioned military, but don’t want that military used unless it is in full cooperation with allies and the broad consent of the international community. These poll numbers are in alignment with mainstream Democratic rhetoric, and appear to be a resounding rejection of the tenets of neo-conservativism (unilateralism and preemptive war). But the numbers do not support a fundamental reevaluation of our post-Cold War forward military basing policy.
Here is an interesting finding:
Palestinians (76%) are the most likely of the publics surveyed to answer that the United States does not have such a responsibility [to play the role of ‘world policeman]. The next most likely are Americans themselves. Three-quarters of Americans (75%) reject the idea that their country has a duty to enforce international law.
Something important has happened to U.S. domestic opinion when we and the Palestinians share the most hostile attitudes towards U.S. unilateralism. This is surely an unintended consequence for the neo-conservatives. It is not, however, a consequence that was unpredictable. Aside from the Iraqis, no publics have suffered more from neo-conservative policies than the U.S. and Palestine.
Another interesting finding: in spite of kicking the U.S. military out fifteen years ago:
In only one country does a majority disagree with the idea that the United States tends to take on the role of international enforcer more than it should: the Philippines…
Nearly four in five respondents in the Philippines (78%) say the United States should either keep “about as many” bases as now (60%) or add more bases (18%).
It looks like Filipinos have a bit of remorse about severing our military ties (although, post-9-11, those ties have been restored to some degree). It’s hard to identify what makes the Philippines such outliers in these polls.
Filipinos (85%) are the most willing to trust the United States and half of them think the United States can be trusted a great deal (48%).
Compare those numbers to Argentina and Peru.
An overwhelming 84 percent of Argentines answer that they have little confidence in the United States, including 69 percent who think the United States cannot be trusted at all. Eight in ten Peruvians (80%) also think the US cannot be trusted (23% not at all).
Argentina is the most hostile country polled.
Of the twelve publics polled, Argentines are those most in favor of shutting down US bases overseas (75%)
And only 1% of Argentinians agree with the statement: “As the sole remaining superpower, the US should continue to be the preeminent world leader in solving international problems.” Of course, only 10% of Americans agree with that statement, as compared to 34% of Indians and 24% of Israelis.
One thing I think we can draw from these polls is that we maintain the most support from two groups. The first is composed of former Soviet republics or satellites like the Ukraine and Poland, and the other is composed of countries like Israel, India, and the Philippines that have strong concerns about Islamic militancy and terrorism. India has emerged in the Bush years as a strikingly strong ally.
The survey also asks respondents in nine countries whether the United States has the “responsibility to play the role of ‘world policeman,’ that is to fight violations of international law and aggression wherever they occur.” Majorities in eight of the nine countries say the United States does not have the responsibility to fight aggression and enforce international law. The exception is India, where a slight majority (53%) says the US does have this responsibility while a third (35%) says it does not.
