Deaths of American troops in Iraq passed 100 for the month of April yesterday:
BAGHDAD (AP) — Five U.S. military personnel were killed over the weekend in Iraq, including three by a roadside bomb in Baghdad, the military said Monday, pushing the American death toll past 100 in the deadliest month so far this year.
Four Army soldiers died in eastern Baghdad, a predominantly Shiite Muslim area where U.S. and Iraqi forces have stepped up operations in the security crackdown that began Feb. 14. A Marine was killed in Anbar province, a Sunni Arab insurgent stronghold west of the capital. […]
The U.S. weekend deaths raised to at least 104 the number of American troops killed in Iraq so far in April, making it the deadliest month since December, when 112 died. At least 3,351 personnel have died since the war started, according to the AP count.
April has been the deadliest month for British forces in Iraq since the first month of the war. The 11 British soldiers killed this month is surpassed only by the 27 deaths in March 2003, reflecting increasing violence in southern Iraq where they are based, particularly among Shiite groups vying for influence as Britain prepares to reduce its force.
God knows how many Iraqis have died. No one in the Pentagon or the Bush administration ever seems willing to give an honest account of those deaths, but I’m sure the rise in dead Americans is matched by an equal increase proportionately among dead Iraqis.
Meanwhile, we now learn that the surge in additional American troops will last much longer than we were originally told back when Bush announced his new strategy for victory in Iraq.
In interviews over the past week, the officials made clear that the White House is now gradually scaling back its expectations for the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. The timelines they are now discussing suggest the White House may maintain the increased numbers of U.S. troops in Iraq well into next year.
That prospect would entail a dramatically longer commitment of frontline troops, patrolling the most dangerous neighborhoods of Baghdad, than the one envisioned in legislation that passed the House and Senate this week….
Unless and until Bush and Cheney are impeached, we are in Iraq through January, 2009, and depending on who is elected President next year, perhaps much longer than that. The longer we stay, the worse the consequences will be for the troops, for our economy, for our national security interests around the world and for what’s left of our collective soul. That is Bush’s legacy: death, failure, wasted lives, wasted dreams and the loss of any moral integrity we once had as a nation. And it’s a legacy that will only get worse, and cost us ever more deeply in the future, each day this war continues.
Not to mention injured soldiers. I saw an article earlier in the occupation saying that people who would have died of their injuries in Vietnam are being saved thanks to improved medical treatments. I wonder how many people are coming home seriously wounded?
That prospect would entail a dramatically longer commitment of frontline troops, patrolling the most dangerous neighborhoods of Baghdad, than the one envisioned in legislation that passed the House and Senate this week….
And where the hell do they think these frontline troops are going to come from?
I know, they’ll just further brutalize the ones that are already there and overextended.
I hate BushCo.
a related article on how swiftly “lots of hope” has vanished;
Saudi King Declines to Receive Iraqi Leader
Isn’t this the 3rd Saudi rebuff to the US in less than a month?
Steven, bro, buddy, you can’t possibly have believed the surge wasn’t anything more than a strategy to buy two more years for Bush and Cheney in a period of Democratic oversight, right?
As soon as the election results are in, they dump Rummy and go with the “surge”. The real question is at this point is what will the next President do? Does anyone here really think that we’ll start pulling troops out in January 2009?
Or will there simply be another surge?
I’ve believed it was a mistake from day one. But then invading and occupying Iraq has been a mistake form Day 1 as well.
I fear we may see President Clinton or Obama regretfully decide that US troops must remain in Iraq, after all. Certainly that will be the case with any Republican.
I think it is time to impeach W and those who led us into war. With the recent mea culpa by Tenet, it is clear the Bush Administration lied to us to get approval for the war in Iraq.
The Bush Administration has lied to the American Public and now will not listen to the American public, then it is the duty of Congress to impeach W, Cheney, and Ms. Mushroom Cloud Rice needs to be fired.