In late May, Zogby polled representative samples of Arab and Jewish Americans for Americans for Peace Now and the Arab American Institute. The poll, Seeing Eye to Eye (pdf), uncovered considerable agreement between the two communities. For example,
- 98% of Jewish Americans and 88% of Arab Americans agree that “Israelis have a right to live in a secure and independent state of their own.” (Table 9)
- 90% of Jewish Americans and 96% of Arab Americans agree that “Palestinians have a right to live in a secure and independent state of their own.” (Table 10)
If Arab and Jewish Americans can agree on a two-state peace settlement the essential basis for ending the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, then so can we. More important, we should work to make that agreement, already embodied in the 2004 Democratic Party Platform, the common position of Democratic candidates nationally in 2008.
As a veteran supporter a two-state peace settlement between Israelis and Palestinians I obviously am encouraged. You’ll find more extended discussions of the merits of a two-state peace settlement in a number of my diaries, including
- Two States / Two Peoples / One Peace
- Where I’m coming from
- Chomsky and the two-state I-P peace settlement.
- An important message for Israel-Palestine peace
- Uri Avnery: Against the idea of a “one-state solution”
- Points of DKos agreement for I-P Peace
Here, I present some additional data from the polls. If, like me, you believe that the significant agreement between the Arab and Jewish American communities helps validate efforts to make active support for a two-state peace settlement between Israelis and Palestinians a priority for US foreign policy, then I hope you will
- indicate your support in the poll;
- recommend this diary to give more people an opportunity to show their support and our ability to reach substantial, essential agreement on this contentious issue; and
- work in your individual communities to impress on friends, acquaintances, and would-be candidates for national office the importance of making a two-state peace settlement an active part of American policy.
Selected additional survey data.
- 68% of Jewish Americans and 64% of Arab Americans would be more likely likely to support a presidential candidate who promised to take an active role in the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians. (Table 7).
- 87% of Jewish Americans and 94% of Arab Americans support a negotiated peace agreement between Israelis and Palestinians that included the establishment of an independent, secure Palestinian state alongside an independent, secure Israeli state, and resolved final status issues of Jerusalem, refugees, and borders. (Table 14).
- 89% of Jewish Americans and 92% of Arab Americans think it important for Arab Americans and Jewish Americans to work together to achieve a Middle East peace where Palestinians and Israelis each have the right to live in an independent state of their own. (Table 13).
- 65% of Jewish Americans and 89% of Arab Americans agree that it is to the interests of both Israelis and Palestinians to end the occupation. (Table 15).
- 63% of Jewish Americans and 77% of Arab Americans agree that Israel should freeze settlement construction because settlements undermine the prospects for achieving peace. (Table 16).
- The two communities need to learn more about what the other actually believes. Although overwhelming majorities of both Jewish Americans and Arab Americans support the right of both Israelis and Palestinians to live in secure and independent states, only 34% of Jewish Americans believe that a majority of Arab Americans hold that view about Israel (88% actually do), and 60% of Arab Americans believe that Jewish Americans hold that view about Palestine (90% actually do). (Tables 9, 10, & 12).
A bit of demography.
Party Affiliation
- Democrat: 66% of Jewish Americans; 40% of Arab Americans
- Republican: 16% of Jewish Americans; 26% of Arab Americans
- Independent: 15% of Jewish Americans; 28% of Arab Americans
Political Outlook
- Progressive: 19% of Jewish Americans; 9% of Arab Americans
- Liberal: 34% of Jewish Americans; 21% of Arab Americans
- Moderate: 27% of Jewish Americans; 41% of Arab Americans
- Conservative: 16% of Jewish Americans; 21% of Arab Americans
- Very Conservative: 2% of Jewish Americans; 5% of Arab Americans
- Libertarian: 3% of Jewish Americans; 3% of Arab Americans
Cross-posted at Daily Kos.
I recognize that the survey data do not include express information regarding such specifics as the sharing, or division, of Jerusalem and the limitation of a Palestinian right of return to the new state of Palestine. But I think certain inferences reasonably may be drawn.
Given the overwhelming Arab American agreement — 88% — “that Israelis have a right to live in a secure and independent state of their own,” I think it reasonable to infer that a substantial majority of Arab Americans, without necessarily renouncing a right of return, would agree to a proposal that, like the Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter endorsed Geneva Initiative, a joint Palestinian-Israeli effort, limits the extent of any return to Israel to that state’s sovereign discretion.
The inference regarding Jerusalem may be somewhat weaker, but I believe that the strong commitment of both communities to a two-state peace settlement and the substantial recognition that Israeli settlements in the West Bank undermine the prospects for peace are suggestive of a recognition that Jerusalem must be shared.
The biggest draw back to such a state is that it does not allow the refugees to return. Effectively, Israel will cease to exist if the refugees are allowed to return.
In other words, Israel has the unique distinction of being the only country in the world whose existence is based on racism. There are a whole lot of racist countries, but only one where racism is required for it to continue to exist.
Not all Jews are willing to gut international law, and western recognised human rights to that extent. It looks to me like more and more Jews are moving towards a single democratic state, with the full right of return and compensation. The victims of Hitler deserve no less, the victims of Zionism deserve no less.
I fully understand why a Palestinian, or an Arab might be willing to make those compromises. I don’t have to, and I am not going to.
Quoting from your link on Chomsky, which is in fact a quote from somewhere else:
As a Jew, his statement makes little sense. What? A Jewish majority in the name of all Jews is going to resort to the ultimate weapon in order to prevent their destruction by Jews who do not support the Jewish majority? What is being said by Chomsky, if I read him right, is that Israel is a fascist state composed of people who would rather die than live in an ethnically mixed state.
Benny Morris
http://www.counterpunch.org/shavit01162004.html
http://heathlander.wordpress.com/2007/04/26/taking-cynicism-to-new-levels/
It is not just Chomsky, but Benny Morris as well that view the Jewish project as a truly extreme form of racism. It is a racism that is shared by fairly large majority of Israeli Jews. Far better to die a glorious death than to live next door to an Arab.
I can understand someone being resigned to a two state solution, as Noam Chompsky seems to be, but I have a real hard time understand someone who would actually support it, excluding those victims who are required in order to create the great Jewish state.
I’ll let the great Zionist Benny Morris have the last word.
http://www.counterpunch.org/shavit01162004.html
Got any links that might provide support for this assertion?
Hmmm. I thought I was providing some sort of logical chain using Benny, Chomsky, and the survey that heatherlander produced. 68% wishing to not live next to an Arab Neighbour is a stunning statistic.
I don’t think that Benny Morris is on the fringe of Israeli society – just more honest. Like the US sunset communities, the desire for a racially purity seems to be rather brutally presented in Israel.
I can do better though and add some quotes from other people:
http://www.monabaker.com/quotes.htm
Ultimately, though, the proof is from the Jews who are dying to ensure a Jewish state in general, and to protect the settlements in particular.
http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/Terrorism-+Obstacle+to+Peace/Palestinian+terror+since+2000/Victims+of+Pale
stinian+Violence+and+Terrorism+sinc.htm
In the various wars Israel has lost between 7 and 11 thousand people. In various uprisings it looks like around 2,500.
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat4.htm
I’d say that Far better to die a glorious death than to live next door to an Arab. has some historical backing based on Jewish blood spilt in Israel.
Interestingly enough, heathlander links to an article describing a poll, not poll results. And while I don’t doubt that there are those who hold such feelings, these quotes don’t tend to prove that it is a large majority who do so. Hence my above inquiry regarding a link.
Fair enough.
http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=%20140196&contrassID=2&subContrassID
=1&sbSubContrassID=0
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1181228576038&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdablusUR4Q&mode=user&search=