.
WASHINGTON (CBS/AP) – President Bush said that Congress must stay in session until it approves legislation modernizing a U.S. law governing eavesdropping on foreigners.
“So far the Democrats in Congress have not drafted a bill I can sign,” Bush said at FBI headquarters, where he was meeting with counterterror and homeland security officials. “We’ve worked hard and in good faith with the Democrats to find a solution, but we are not going to put our national security at risk. Time is short.”
The president said lawmakers cannot leave for their August recess this weekend as planned unless they “pass a bill that will give our intelligence community the tools they need to protect the United States.”
Bush has the authority under the Constitution to call Congress back into session once it has recessed or adjourned, but White House spokeswoman Dana Perrino said talk of him doing that is premature.
“We cannot imagine that Congress would leave without fixing the problem,” she said.
As of early afternoon, however, it was clear that no deal was imminent.
President Bush accompanied by VP Dick Cheney, makes comments after meeting with the Counterterrorism Team at the J. Edgar Hoover FBI Building . (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
Sen. Kit Bond, top Republican on the Intelligence Committee, said the White House’s offer included several concessions; among them to let the plan expire in six months, giving lawmakers time to work out a more comprehensive law.
National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell “has put on the table this last best offer,” Bond said.
Earlier Friday, the White House offered an eleventh-hour accord to Democrats in the negotiations over the matter, saying it would agree to a court review of its foreign intelligence activities instead of leaving certification up to the attorney general and director of national intelligence.
But it attached several conditions that could be unacceptable to Democrats: that the review would only be after-the-fact and would only involve the administration’s general process of collecting the intelligence, not individual cases, said a senior administration official speaking on condition of anonymity to more freely discuss internal deliberations.
…
The FISA court review would happen 120 days after the surveillance began, another senior administration official said. Until then, McConnell and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales would oversee and approve the process of targeting foreign terrorists, said the official who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing negotiations.
The administration is demanding that this apply to monitoring of all foreign targets, no matter whether they end up communicating with another foreigner or someone in the U.S, and no matter whether they are a suspected terrorist or a target for some other reason.
Democrats leery of Gonzales’ involvement said that seemed far too long a period of time before the FISA court could step in.
Bush said that he would judge any bill sent to him by one measure alone: McConnell’s judgment as to whether it provides “what you need to prevent an attack on the country.”
“If the answer’s ‘no,’ I’m going to veto the bill,” Bush said.
Did the GOP Minority Leader in the House really leak classified information in order to help the Bush administration negotiate an amendment to the FISA law? How could that be? I’m sure we’ll soon learn that the Vice President must have secretly declassified this before Boehner talked to FOX News about it …
America has moved so far into fascism that Congress is now blythely talking about “updating” a law that strips Americans of their civil liberties. Whether or not Bush can stongarm the gutless Reid and Pelosi into acquiesing his further fascist tyranny, the true American action for Congress to take is to repeal, not update, FISA.
But, of course, it’s more important for politicians these days to not appear to be soft on fighting Bush’s Orwellian perpetual war that to actually defend bedrock American values, principles, and the Constitution.
.
The 60-28 roll call by which the Senate voted to temporarily give President Bush expanded authority to eavesdrop on foreign terrorists without court warrants.
On this vote, a “yes” vote was a vote to give Bush that authority and a “no” vote was a vote to deny him that authority.
Voting “yes” were 16 Democrats, 43 Republicans and 1 independent.
Voting “no” were 27 Democrats, 0 Republicans and 1 independent.
The 16 Democrats who voted YES on this bill:
Arkansas
Lincoln (D) Yes; Pryor (D) Yes.
California
Boxer (D) Not Voting; Feinstein (D) Yes.
Colorado
Salazar (D) Yes.
Connecticut
Lieberman (I) Yes.
Delaware
Carper (D) Yes.
Florida
Nelson (D) Yes.
Hawaii
Inouye (D) Yes.
Indiana
Bayh (D) Yes;
Louisiana
Landrieu (D) Yes;
Maryland
Mikulski (D) Yes.
Minnesota
Klobuchar (D) Yes.
Missouri
McCaskill (D) Yes.
Nebraska
Nelson (D) Yes.
North Dakota
Conrad (D) Yes; Dorgan (D) Not Voting.
Pennsylvania
Casey (D) Yes;
Virginia
Webb (D) Yes
● Senate passes Bush spy bill – House rejects it’s version
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
.
House Democrats lost an effort to push a proposal that called for stricter court oversight of the way the government would ensure its spying wouldn’t target Americans.
“We can have security and our civil liberties,” said Rep. John Tierney, D- Mass.
Current law requires court review of government surveillance of suspected terrorists in the U.S. It doesn’t specifically address the government’s ability to intercept messages believed to come from foreigners overseas.
…
The Senate-approved plan, largely developed by the White House, barely made it through after Bush promised to veto a stricter proposal that would have required a court review to begin within 10 days. The Senate bill provides for a FISA court review within 120 days. The Senate bill gives Bush the expanded eavesdropping authority for six months. The White House initially wanted the bill to be permanent.
Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., chastised his colleagues for bending to the administration’s will. “The day we start deferring to someone who’s not a member of this body… is a sad day for the U.S. Senate”.
Likewise, civil liberties advocates said they were outraged that Democratic- led Senate would side with the White House. “We’re hugely disappointed with the Democrats,” said Caroline Fredrickson, legislative director for the American Civil Liberties Union. “The idea they let themselves be manipulated into accepting the White House proposal, certainly taking a great deal of it, when they’re in control – it’s mind-boggling.”
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."