Appearing at The Blogging Curmudgeon, My Left Wing, and the Independent Bloggers’ Alliance.
From The Boston Globe:
At least two prominent board members of the regional Anti-Defamation League have resigned in protest over the national ADL’s decision to fire the regional director for acknowledging the slaughter of Armenians during World War I as genocide.
Former chairman of the Polaroid Corp., Stewart L. Cohen, and City Council member Mike Ross told the Globe yesterday they could no longer be part of an organization with national leaders who refused to acknowledge the Armenian genocide and fired regional director, Andrew H. Tarsy, on Friday for taking a position in support of Armenian-Americans.
. . .
The resignations — which may be the first of others to come — were announced as members of the local Jewish and Armenian-American communities praised Tarsy and the regional board for taking stands recognizing the Armenian genocide and criticized the ADL’s national director, Abraham H. Foxman, for taking a position out of step not just locally, but perhaps nationally.
If Foxman does not change his position and acknowledge the genocide, George Beilin, a past president of the North Shore Council of the B’nai B’rith Organization, called on the national leader to “resign immediately for the sake of the Jewish community in the United States and the world.”
A brief history lesson (expurgated text from here):
For three thousand years, a thriving Armenian community had existed inside the vast region of the Middle East bordered by the Black, Mediterranean and Caspian Seas. The area, known as Asia Minor, stands at the crossroads of three continents; Europe, Asia and Africa. Great powers rose and fell over the many centuries and the Armenian homeland was at various times ruled by Persians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, Arabs and Mongols.
. . .
In the eleventh century, the first Turkish invasion of the Armenian homeland occurred. Thus began several hundred years of rule by Muslim Turks. By the sixteenth century, Armenia had been absorbed into the vast and mighty Ottoman Empire. At its peak, this Turkish empire included much of Southeast Europe, North Africa, and almost all of the Middle East.
As the Ottoman Empire crumbled, the Armenians began a push for reform, but the Sultan Abdul Hamid’s response resulted in the massacre of over 100,000 Armenians. Armenian hope was renewed with the ascendancy of the Young Turks, who pressed for a constitutional government and human rights protections. But, when three of the Young Turks seized the levers of power, and embarked on a nationalist push for a new “Turanism,” the problems for the Armenians began in earnest. The new government seized the weapons from the Armenian population and Armenian members of the Turkish military were reassigned to “slave labor battalions.”
The decision to annihilate the entire population came directly from the ruling triumvirate of ultra-nationalist Young Turks. The actual extermination orders were transmitted in coded telegrams to all provincial governors throughout Turkey. Armed roundups began on the evening of April 24, 1915, as 300 Armenian political leaders, educators, writers, clergy and dignitaries in Constantinople (present day Istanbul) were taken from their homes, briefly jailed and tortured, then hanged or shot.
Next, there were mass arrests of Armenian men throughout the country by Turkish soldiers, police agents and bands of Turkish volunteers. The men were tied together with ropes in small groups then taken to the outskirts of their town and shot dead or bayoneted by death squads. Local Turks and Kurds armed with knives and sticks often joined in on the killing.
. . .
Then it was the turn of Armenian women, children, and the elderly. On very short notice, they were ordered to pack a few belongings and be ready to leave home, under the pretext that they were being relocated to a non-military zone for their own safety. They were actually being taken on death marches heading south toward the Syrian Desert.
Roughly 75 percent of the million plus Armenians marched through the desert died of starvation, dehydration, and other causes; many of them children and elderly. In the end an estimated 1.5 million Armenians were determined to have been killed by massacre and march. The Turkish government continues to deny the genocide of the Armenian people.
Addendum: The ADL has issued a press release addressing the Armenian genocide.
In light of the heated controversy that has surrounded the Turkish-Armenian issue in recent weeks, and because of our concern for the unity of the Jewish community at a time of increased threats against the Jewish people, ADL has decided to revisit the tragedy that befell the Armenians.
We have never negated but have always described the painful events of 1915-1918 perpetrated by the Ottoman Empire against the Armenians as massacres and atrocities. On reflection, we have come to share the view of Henry Morgenthau, Sr. that the consequences of those actions were indeed tantamount to genocide. If the word genocide had existed then, they would have called it genocide.
I have consulted with my friend and mentor Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel and other respected historians who acknowledge this consensus. I hope that Turkey will understand that it is Turkey’s friends who urge that nation to confront its past and work to reconcile with Armenians over this dark chapter in history.
Having said that, we continue to firmly believe that a Congressional resolution on such matters is a counterproductive diversion and will not foster reconciliation between Turks and Armenians and may put at risk the Turkish Jewish community and the important multilateral relationship between Turkey, Israel and the United States.
.
What is the point to join a political battle over a genocide a century ago when in Darfur, Congo (DRC) and across the world people are being murdered or dying due to hunger, poverty or ecological disaster.
In Europe, the nations with second thought of Turkey becoming an EU member, are provoking a stance on the Armenian genocide issue. Why bash heads on an historical discussion? Already too much blood has been shed: Armenia/Karabakh
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
If the Nazi Holocaust had been swept under the carpet as neatly, would you also advocate leaving it there? I’m just curious.
The answer to your “what is the point” question is simply this. If we fail to learn the lessons of history, we are doomed to repeat it: Durfur, Congo, et al.
I will not let myself be reduced to silence, either.
the Armenian genocide nor the Holocaust.
Every decade since WWII, there has been a genocide that the world community just stood by for. We, the US, knew about the Cambodian genocide but did nothing. Clinton stood by while 800K Rwandans were hacked to death. Hundreds of thousands of Darfurians have been killed before our eyes.
And we stand aside as well while lesser but gross human justice violations occur in the West Bank and Gaza, including the starvation of children and killings of innocent civilians by American supplied Israeli military units, who either maintain an illegal occupation or a seige.
What the hell have we become?
Thank you, really. Many Jews have stood by Armenians in the acknowledgement of the genocide when it wasn’t easy. There’s also been a long and painful history of Jewish leaders who didn’t, out of political self-interest. Publicizing this protest will hopefully show the support that principled leaders deserve.
What is the point?
First of all, it is often the victims of genocide and their descendents who act for justice when they see other people being killed for political expediency. Armenians today, who know their history, are actively urging political leaders around the world to stop the genocide in Darfur.
Second of all, allowing revisionist history to stand unopposed, in the name of not joining “political battles” gives fuel to murderous regimes who will today use the cover of ignorance and indolence to carry out atrocities on a massive scale.
Finally, the injury of genocide does not end with the death of its victims. The unwillingness of others to bear witness and to acknowledge historical truths makes the descendents of survivors feel that their ancestors’ sufferings were truly meaningless. It also brings despair to anyone who today depends for their life on those who can defend them against murder, poverty, or ecological disaster only at great personal cost to themselves.
I can’t tell whether you’re a troll or just someone who’s never given a second’s thought to the consequences of revisionist history. Either way, your comment is insulting in the least.
What is “Turanism”?
I linked to for the history, it’s explained in more detail. “Turan” was a conception of a nationalistic vision. Here’s a snippet:
The religion, of course, was Islam; the Armenians, Christian — as well as being culturally their own people.