Cross-Posted from Take A Stand – My Home Blog – Please feel free to comment or bookmark over at my home blog, it’s new.
People are drawing comparisons between Obama’s run and George W. Bush’s run in 2000. So alright, let’s compare. George W. Bush ran as a uniter and pulled the wool right over America’s eyes.
So now lets talk about Obama. One of the most progressive voting records in the Senate. GWB, if you ask me, is taking a lot of positions pursuant with the policies he enacted and pushed as governor. So if you look at what Obama has actually done in Illinois and in the Senate, I would think you’d be happy to have him being able to be called a “uniter”. He will unite this country around progressive politics, he will draw strong Republican support for progressive values.
What part of that looks like a negative to any of you?
Bush is decisive in dividing. Bush knows how.
On foreign policy, Obama just gained the endorsement of Brzezinski; such endorsement by Zbig is considered in some circles to be a foreign policy coup.
“we need a change of direction.”
On domestic policy? I’m still pondering Bush’s policy of neglect since he’s consumed by fighting a concept – “the WoT”
My comment aside. Nice blog site. From recent postings it appears to be all pro-Obama and anti-Hillary. This site wouldn’t be an extension of a certain campaign HQ? Just asking.
Good luck with the project. We’ll watch the mo.