There are no positive developments with the Bush administration. All movement is retrograde. Always. What this means is that the welcome resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is not something to applaud but, rather, an opportunity for mischief.
The rumor mill has it that Bush will nominate Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff to replace Alberto Gonzales. Democrats should absolutely refuse to confirm this nomination. But more on that below. Another concern is Bush’s reported intention to replace Chertoff at the DHS with his prep-school buddy Clay Johnson III. Clay Johnson III has no experience in Homeland Security and he is nothing more than a Bush stooge. Here is what Bush told Mr. Johnson when he appointed him as chief of staff in Texas.
“I want someone whose primary interest is me — George Bush — and who doesn’t hope to parlay this into something and isn’t trying to curry favor with this one or that one,” Bush told Johnson and his wife, Anne Sewell Johnson, over lunch.
We do not need another Bush loyalist taking charge of our Homeland Security. That’s nuts, and the Democrats should have none of it.
We saw the result of such practices in the response to Hurricane Katrina. And, while the Senate confirmed Chertoff 98-0 to his position as head of the DHS, that was before we witnessed his incompetence in dealing with an environmental disaster. We now know that we need a higher caliber person to head DHS.
The reality is that the Senate never, ever, should have confirmed Chertoff to anything…particularly Homeland Security. The man has to answer questions about why he represented an al-Qaeda connected man in the late 1990’s. Chertoff moved from representing a terror-supporter to the head of the criminal division at the FBI. Chertoff was in charge of the investigation into 9/11. Why was a laywer for al-Qaeda put in charge of investigating al-Qaeda?
For some asinine reason, Chertoff is considered one of the ‘good Republicans’ by the Democratic Establishment. That’s crazy. He got his big start working for Alphonse D’Amato’s witchhunt of a Whitewater investigation. He left that job, inexplicably, to represent a friend of Usama bin-Laden.
But this isn’t just about Chertoff’s links to terrorists. The Democrats should insist that the new Attorney General has no links to the Bush administration. We need total independence, not someone with a vested interest in covering up crimes they may have been a party to planning and implementing.
And, no AG should be confirmed until the administration turns over all subpoenaed material.
I agree with all of this.
OTOH, I fully expect Chertoff to be confirmed.
You can see it coming a mile away.
There will be much handwringing from the democratic majority, claiming that they’re powerless to do anything, and saying that a bad AG is better than none at all.
…but at least that powder is still dry.
Well, Lieberman is chairman, so the deck is stacked, no?
yeah, well they had an opportunity to do something about that in 2006.
And then Boxer campaigned for Lieberman. And Obama skipped Connecticut entirely, refusing to put in a good word for Ned Lamont. Same with Hill the Shill.
The whole bunch of them rushed to HoJo’s aid, so if the deck is stacked, it’s because they stacked it themselves.
Actually, Leahy will be in charge of the AG appointment and Lieberman would be in charge of DHS, if Chertoff gets appointed as AG.
Bush has no credibility and no relevance. Dems should decide on a replacement themselves and block every choice presented by Bush unless it’s Nader or Conyers or Spitzer or the equivalent. When an administration is a criminal enterprise, we’re better off with no AG than an administration choice.
Bush is no longer watching the numbers as he dives into territory that not even Hoover reached. This is an I-no-longer-give-a shit mode, and will do what I please, not what even the Republicans want. Well, whomever gets these appointments, it cannot but help the Democrats in 2008.
Wouldn’t the new attourney be a recess appointment?
That’s what I am waiting to hear. Who needs to worry about confirmation when you have recess appointments?
I’m betting on a recess appointment also. Bush is pissed about Gonzales leaving so he’s going to do his damdest to make sure he appoints someone…Neener Neener neener to us.
Gonzales no doubt waited until Congress was in recess to resign just so bush could appoint someone. If I’m wrong it won’t be the first time.
it certainly changes the game plan that Reid had going into recess:
yeah, sure…the checks in the mail, sucker!!! the only promise chimpy hasn’t broken is the one about not leaving Iraq.
if l were Henry, l’d be getting some bodies back in DC ASAP, and stuff this option right now.
lTMF’sA
No recess. Gonzo’s resignation is on Sep. 17th!!!!
While everything you say is true, I still find myself in doubt. Our shrub will appoint a better liar, and congress won’t have the guts to stop him.
just sayin’…
some interesting speculation at Wapo, re: possible replacements in addition to skeletor:
…White House Homeland Security aide Frances Townsend and former deputy attorney general Larry Thompson…
and from the sfgate/ross report:
…As to Gonzales’s replacement, names mentioned on Capitol Hill, according to the Washington Post, include Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff; former deputy attorney general James Comey and former deputy attorney Larry Thompson. Another name floated: former Solicitor General Ted Olson…
l’m not convinced chertoff is anything more than a stalking horse at this point. it’s seems unlikely, given the potential for agressive confirmation hearings and, one would hope, demands for information being witheld by the WH, that they would be eager to have concurrent confirmation processes on two of the most ineffectual departments in the government. might even force lieberman to investigate the katrina catastrophe.
lTMF’sA
They need to demand a special prosecutor to investigate all of this politicization in exchange for meeting halfway in any nomination. This is the one time they have the leverage to do so.
Politico.com is saying Paul Clement would be Bush’s choice.
But frankly, BooMan’s correct.
“And, no AG should be confirmed until the administration turns over all subpoenaed material.”
None of the names I’m seeing would be acceptable unless they are willing to say publicly “As AG I plan to reverse this administration’s illegal wiretapping and torture activities and fully investigate anyone involved in them.”
Otherwise, let the position remain empty.
the insanity is far from over folks. Don’t you dare get comfortable. Just stay alert. did anyone hear what that piece of shit said? gonzo was driven from office by a political attack! And where the hell are the effing dems? Why the hell aren’t they right out there pidgeonholing the reporters from anywhere and ripping the goddamned bastard a new asshole?
See! cornyn crying out regarding the unfairness. Just wait. The machine is just starting up. By tonight it will be absolutely astounding.
St gonzo the devine will be stroked until he emerges as one of the great individuals of the current admin.
Now the game of gGuess Who begins and everyone gets distracted from the nightmares going on out there.
Here is one-
How about that fat drug addict discussing why the US wouldn’t even consider intervening in the Darfur genocide! google that one and then tell me that the “liberal media” is in control! That fat piece of shit should be removed from the airways and should never be permitted to have a program anywhere on the “Free” airways!
So- like I said- there is no rest for the weary folks- not until these bastards are out of office!
overall, i agree with this post. but i’m pretty uncomfortable with tarring chertoff because he once represented as a lawyer an al qaeda connected defendant. there’s nothing wrong with that in my mind. hell, if anything it’s actually a point in favor of his nomination, it demonstrates that he has some inkling of the principle that everyone is entitled to legal representation. that’s a notion that gonzo seemed to completely lack.
anyway, as i said, i think chertoff would be a bad AG, but more because of katrina and his “gut feeling” than his work as a lawyer. and clay johnson looks like he would be a total disaster.
The question of Chertoff’s al-Qaeda connections run deeper than just his decision to represent a bad guy.
At the time, Chertoff was probably among the top 5 Republican lawyers in New Jersey. He had been working on D’Amato’s staff.
The question is: why on Earth did he take this low-profile HMO fraud case? And…why did none of the people connected to this investigation wind up in prison? Did Chertoff have the means to obstruct the investigation? And isn’t it disturbing that he was in place on 9/11 and put in charge of investigating the hijackers?
Not too many lawyers in America were experienced in representing al-Qaeda connected suspects before 9/11. What were the chances that one of them would be in charge of investigating the crime?
why on Earth did he take this low-profile HMO fraud case?
probably because he was in prive practice at the time and they were willing to pay the big bucks. i’m just guessing, but that’s what 99% of legal representation comes down to. i know former supreme court justice clerks who take low-profile cases all the time. it’s not a strange thing at all, provided that the client is willing to pay the big bucks for a prominent lawyer.
seriously, you’re raising a lot of flags about stuff that isn’t all that remarkable.
and by the way, the “criminal case” vs. a “terrorism case” distinction made in one of the articles you cite in the kos post is an anacronism, which makes the article somewhat suspect. in the 1990s “terrorism” was a crime, and rightly so in my mind. distinguishing a “criminal case” from a “terrorism case” only makes sense in the post-9/11 world, when bush decided that terrorism should no longer be treated as a criminal act but rather an act of war.
and again, the fact that chertoff was willing to provide representation to possible terrorists is a point in his favor as AG, not against. everyone, even terrorist suspects, should have the right to an attorney. if chertoff understands that, it at least makes him better than gonzales.
I think there’s more to it. Richard was on this story, too.