People that know me know that I frequently joke about Bush’s prospects in retirement. Who is going to pay to hear him give a speech? George W. Bush is like Dan Quayle on steroids. He’s not just ridiculous, he’s actually responsible. He’s going to go down in history as a kind of hybrid of Nixon/McGovern/Carter. He’ll be part radical, part incompetent, part crooked, and totally responsible for ruining the short-term prospects for his party. No one is going to want to hear Bush speak. First of all, he can’t speak. But Bush is counting on a lot of money coming his way on the lecture tour.
…in an interview with a book author in the Oval Office one day last December, he daydreamed about the next phase of his life, when his time will be his own.
First, Mr. Bush said, “I’ll give some speeches, just to replenish the ol’ coffers.” With assets that have been estimated as high as nearly $21 million, Mr. Bush added, “I don’t know what my dad gets — it’s more than 50-75” thousand dollars a speech, and “Clinton’s making a lot of money.”
Somehow I don’t think the Crawford Kiwanis Club has that kind of cheese. Bush’s real ambition is even more pie-in-the-sky.
For now, though, Mr. Bush told the author, Robert Draper, in a later session, “I’m playing for October-November.” That is when he hopes the Iraq troop increase will finally show enough results to help him achieve the central goal of his remaining time in office: “To get us in a position where the presidential candidates will be comfortable about sustaining a presence,” and, he said later, “stay longer.”
But fully aware of his standing in opinion polls, Mr. Bush said his top commander in Iraq, Gen. David H. Petraeus, would perhaps do a better job selling progress to the American people than he could.
“Stay longer.” That’s Bush’s real goal for America. He wants to make it possible for us to stay longer in Iraq. And this is the kind of confidence he provides…
Mr. Bush acknowledged one major failing of the early occupation of Iraq when he said of disbanding the Saddam Hussein-era military, “The policy was to keep the army intact; didn’t happen.”
But when Mr. Draper pointed out that Mr. Bush’s former Iraq administrator, L. Paul Bremer III, had gone ahead and forced the army’s dissolution and then asked Mr. Bush how he reacted to that, Mr. Bush said, “Yeah, I can’t remember, I’m sure I said, ‘This is the policy, what happened?’ ” But, he added, “Again, Hadley’s got notes on all of this stuff,” referring to Stephen J. Hadley, his national security adviser.
To this day, he doesn’t know why the Iraqi army was disbanded? Hard to hold someone accountable for that decision if you don’t know who made it, and why. But Bush is just being dishonest. He’s dishonest to the end.
“One interesting question historians are going to have to answer is: Would Saddam have behaved differently if he hadn’t gotten mixed signals between the first resolution and the failure of the second resolution?” Mr. Bush said. “I can’t answer that question. I was hopeful that diplomacy would work.”
It did not, but soon enough, somebody else will make the decisions on Iraq. And then, Mr. Bush said, he would still be pursuing his “freedom agenda” at his institute, modeled on Stanford’s Hoover Institution, where young democratic leaders from around the world would study.
“Sixty-two is really young,” Mr. Bush said, “and yet I’ll be through with my presidency.”
No one is going to show up at his shitty institute. Who is this guy kidding?
Here’s the one part I enjoyed reading…
Mr. Bush went on to share private thoughts that appeared to reflect a level of sorrow and presidential isolation that he strongly implied he took pains to hide, a state of being that he seemed to view as coming with the presidency and with which he professed to be at peace.
Telling Mr. Draper he likes to keep things “relatively light-hearted” around the White House, he added in May, “I can’t let my own worries — I try not to wear my worries on my sleeve; I don’t want to burden them with that.”
“Self-pity is the worst thing that can happen to a presidency,” Mr. Bush told Mr. Draper, by way of saying he sought to avoid it. “This is a job where you can have a lot of self-pity.”
In the same interview, Mr. Bush seemed to indicate that he had his down moments at home, saying of his wife, Laura, “Back to the self-pity point — she reminds me that I decided to do this.”
Did Laura mean ‘run for President’ or did she mean ‘invade Iraq’? Either way, it was a mistake and a misfortune.
His ‘retirement’ should be spent behind bars.
We need to send the entire so-called administration and their lackeys to that ‘retirement home’.
Let them sit there and reminisce of their g(l)ory days.
Heck no. Why burden Laura and Barney and the twins and the White House staff with all the ugliness going on in the real world? :/
My daughter’s close friends, a couple she went all through school with, have just given birth to twin boys and the husband, all of 22-years old, red haired and freckled, is being deployed to Iraq next month FOR THE THIRD TIME, leaving his wife and three baby boys under the age of two. My biggest fear is that we’ll be there long enough for those babies to put on uniforms and strap guns to their sides and try to save face for some future administration.
What happened to the 10,000 acre spread in Paraguay?
He’s going to go down in history as a kind of hybrid of Nixon/McGovern/Carter.
Marcos would be closer to the mark.
Hilter, Pol Pot,Vlad the Impaler would be my choices.
Sounds like he is taking heat from the republican candidates. He’s stuck, stupid and living in a freaking dream world. A world where people pay an idiot to speak on how he fucked a country and got a couple hundred thousand people killed. How to create millions of refugees would be an interesting speech.
An Institute? WTF? What can this place teach except failure and pain? That is all this man has achieved. His legacy is pain without end.
He’s going to go down in history as a kind of hybrid of Nixon/McGovern/Carter. He’ll be part radical, part incompetent, part crooked, and totally responsible for ruining the short-term prospects for his party.
Nice buy-in to a conventional frame there. I have a hard time figuring out which of those terms apply to McGovern and Carter. But all three apply to Richard Nixon. Three terms “movement conservatism”, “Cambodia”, “Watergate” illustrate those perfectly.
What did in the Democratic Party in the short term was the failure to acknowledge the anti-war sentiment at the 1968 Democratic Convention. Had Humphrey decided to run to get out of Vietnam, he would have won. Nixon ran on “peace with honor” and won; no matter that he didn’t intend it as other than a campaign slogan.
I would argue that the moderates in the Democratic Party, much like the BushDogs today, are responsible for the failure of McGovern’s campaign. When you own party leadership is walking away from you, it’s difficult to win. And remember that party leadership in 1972 included a bunch of segregationist Democratic politicians, Richard Daley, and proto-neo-cons like Scoop Jackson.
And what to say about the rap on Carter. Studying what he actually accomplished instead of what the press said he accomplished is a helpful exercise. Reagan cut an arms deal with Iran, yes that Iran, in order to sabotage Carter’s strong negotiating position on the hostages. Carter negotiated the Camp David accords. Carter had alternative energy programs in place, which as the first act of office, Ronald Reagan scuttled. Carter granted amnesty to Vietnam draft resisters. Carter appointed Paul Volcker, who was most responsible for ending the stagflation resulting from Vietnam war debt.
Don’t be so sure nobody will pay for “speeches”. The military-corporate complex is much stronger than ever and the Bush Crime Family still has plenty of bucks and connections. Bush has been a living cornucopia for beneficiaries as diverse (or not) as the neo-fascist propaganda establishment, AlQaida, the mercenary industry, the prison industry, the weapons industry, the terrorist industry, Islamist recruiters, Apocalypse peddlers, and all who struck it rich on “privatization” and permanent war.
There may be no honor among thieves, but as the Bushes and the Sopranos so conclusively demonstrate, loyalty is the prime directive among thieves and killers. Unless Bush and Cheney are turned over to Iraq war crimes tribunals, they will enjoy ample adulation and funding from constituents who could not have acquired America without their participation.
Anyone else get the feeling that Laura really busts his ghoulies on a regular basis?
Not me. I think she’s medicated to within an inch of her life. She looks like a Stepford Wife.