Joe Lieberman is at it again, this time with the help of Republican wingnut Jon Kyl of Arizona. The two of them have introduced the Lieberman-Kyl amendment to a defense bill which would, if passed, state that the Senate supports military action against Iran, and against anyone considered to be one of Iran’s proxies (such as Hezbollah, or the Shi’ite militias in Iraq). Here’s the relevant text of the amendment:
3) that it should be the policy of the United States to combat, contain, and roll back the violent activities and destabilizing influence inside Iraq of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its foreign facilitators such as Lebanese Hezbollah, and its indigenous Iraqi proxies;
(4) to support the prudent and calibrated use of all instruments of United States national power in Iraq, including diplomatic, economic, intelligence, and military instruments, in support of the policy described in paragraph (3) with respect to the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its proxies.
I imagine Bush and Cheney would view this resolution as all the authority they need to attack Iran at their discretion, don’t you? Just one more sign, as Chris Floyd reminds us, that the Iran war train express has already left the station and is picking up steam:
The Lieberman-Kyl-Non-Entity Amendment is just one aspect of the acceleration toward war now unfolding before our eyes. Indeed, perhaps the strongest confirmation that our Terror War machine will soon begin devouring the lives of innocent Iranians is not any saber-rattling by Beltway officials, but the astonishing interview that Scott Pelley of the “liberal” network CBS conducted with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on “60 Minutes.” As Glenn Greenwald points out, Pelley trotted out Bush Regime war propaganda as if it were unquestioned Gospel truth. […]
More than the stories about Dick Cheney’s hard-on to kill Persians — by proxy, of course; Cheney never has and never will put the husk of lard that houses his greed-shrivelled brain in harm’s way;other men, and women, and children, must die for his agenda — the Pelley interview is the one of the clearest indications yet that the war is coming and nothing will stop it. Here we see that the “conventional wisdom” of the American Establishment — as always, faithfully reflected by the witless hacks of the “serious” corporate media — has now accepted the sinister narrative that the Bush Regime has concocted to justify another war. Congress, as we’ve seen, is already on board. The major media players — the New York Times, CBS, CNN, etc. — have signed up. And neither Congress nor the corporate media would be pushing, spinning and cajoling for war with such gusto if their owners in the American elite were not also ready to lock and load.
Some believe that, in the end, Bush won’t pull the trigger on Iran, that he will be stopped, or at least dissuaded, by recalcitrant military brass unwilling to see their overstretched, crumbling forces broken completely in a major new conflict. But I think these are false hopes. As we have seen over the years, the Bush Regime ruthlessly purges officers who question the Leader’s maniacal agenda or stand up too strongly for the honor and well-being of their troops. And the planned attack on Iran will be mostly a matter of airpower and naval-based missiles: remote killing by generals and admirals who love their glitzy, high-tech toys and want to give them the kind of unbridled work-out they’ve been denied since the early days of the Iraq invasion. (All that daily, workhorse dumping of a few bombs and missiles on Iraqi civilian areas here and there just doesn’t provide the same kind of thrill.)
Chris has good reasons to be pessimistic. Anyone who saw Mr. Pelley’s performance as a shill for the Bush administration on 60 Minutes Sunday night can only assume that his “questions” (which parroted Bush/Cheney talking points about the evils of Iran and its President almost word for word) had to have been greenlighted by CBS’ management in collaboration with administration officials. It was more than just a sorry spectacle, it was the worst form of propaganda designed to whip up a war fever against Iran by everyone who watched what can only be loosely described as as interview by an objective journalist, and which would be more accurately depicted as the ranting of a warmongering demagogue.
Nonetheless, I am unwilling to surrender to what many are claiming is inevitable: a full scale premeditated and illegal attack against Iran by American forces. So please, call your Senators at these toll free numbers: 800 828-0498, 800 614 2803 or 866 340 9281 and let them know that support for this atrocity (i.e., the Lieberman Kyl amendment) is unwarranted and immoral, and that their vote in favor of it will violate the will of the vast majority of Americans like yourself, who wish to see no more wars by initiated on President Bush’s watch.
While you’re at it, go to this website and sign their petition in opposition to the amendment.
You are so Right. The drums beat louder and louder. Planned chaos. Non-ending war. That is why the call to action is so important. We have a responsibility and we are not living up to it.
The greatest communication system ever created by human beings is in place. You and I use it daily and yet we don’t seem capable of taking our strength to the next level.
What do we have to do. Wait till they come for us?
Thanks for beating me to the punch. My essay, The makings of the US-Iran (Israel Proxy) War, is no longer necessary. I had just received this appeal for grass-roots action from Just Foreign Policy and responded. Israel’s representative in the Senate, Joe Lieberman (along with Senator Kyl), is at it again attempting to wag the dog and get the US involved in a military confrontation with Iran. It must be stopped.
The text of their message was as follows:
The Neocons in the Whitehouse and beyond are just not giving up. Please send them a nessage.
why is the world letting us get away with this? it’s not like we can pay our bills, so why don’t they say no?
Anti-semitic conspiracy theorists insist that the actions of Lieberman and the rest of the neocon gang has something to do with loyalty to Israel. Andrew Sullivan has just assured me by email that this can’t be true because Israel opposed the attack on Iraq.
“Israel opposed the attack on Iraq.”
However, true, it is not the point. The point is that the Israel Lobby, with AIPAC leading the way are not acting in Israel’s best interests. AIPAC is aligned with the most hard Zionist position in Israel, the Netanyahu-Likud position, which supports a winner take all perspective on the West Bank and nil prospects for a Palestinian state. That is a central theme of Mearsheimer and Walt’s book.
Lieberman has been so obvious in his support of the Israel Lobby and its hard Zionism that it is inconceivable that anyone would call it a conspiracy theory. He kissed Bush for his Iraq war and he presently supports an extreme stay the course position. That position is also AIPAC’s, whatever Israel did or did not approve before the invasion. Now he is pushing legislation to permit an attack on Iran.
AntiSemitism is a charge Mearsheimer and Walt have had to contend with but the fear of AIPAC and the ADL and other right wingers has not stopped them. It is time we stopped pretending and understand how a small group of hard Zionists, who act against America’s and Israel’s best interests are trying to influence our foreign policy.
What the hell does the Lieberman Kyl amendment have to to do with anti-semetism? What it has to do with is insanity and/or cravenness (depending on whether as a Senator you really believe Iran must be destroyed or because you’re simply too intimidated to vote against it).
Debating Ahmadinejad at Columbia
by JAYATI VORA
A tall man with white hair, wearing a US-flag print shirt and pants, patrolled the sidewalk at 116th and Broadway. He waved a huge American flag as he marched, in movements that were nearly metronomic in their consistency. Stacks of brochures sat on a bare and rickety table, waiting to be handed out to anyone who didn’t look away quickly enough. Bystanders stared.
I hadn’t been back to my former school almost since I graduated. Returning as an alumna of the School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), the school that sponsored Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s talk here on Monday, I felt the puff of pride that Columbia had not backed down in the face of media pressure. I also felt just a little bit cheated that it was happening now, when I was attending as an outsider, rather than the first time his talk had been announced, in 2006, when I was still a sleep-deprived student.
The police officers stationed in and around the university, beginning at the platform of the subway that I had taken to get there, looked at everyone suspiciously. Women in dark, severe suits monitored the entry of the press, taking signatures and examining credentials. Everywhere, people in uniforms directed the human traffic and at certain entrances demanded identification. Fliers lined the walkway to the main quadrangle and littered the brick paths. Students milled around the campus, talking excitedly in tight groups or listening to the speakers outside Low Library. Homemade placards offered silent counterpoint to some of the speeches delivered at the podium. AHMADINEJAD IS NOT IRAN JUST LIKE BUSH IS NOT AMERICA,” said one. “WE SAY NO TO WAR ON IRAN,” proclaimed another. And a third, my favorite, in black paint on a wood sheet: “FREE SPEECH FOR ALL, EVEN DOUCHE BAGS.
Read on: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071008/vora
Anti-semitic conspiracy theorists insist that the actions of Lieberman and the rest of the neocon gang has something to do with loyalty to Israel. Andrew Sullivan has just assured me by email that this can’t be true because Israel opposed the attack on Iraq.
caple66wood
You are seriously misinformed. Or, blinded by bias. You should read Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com said today about the Beltway pundits. I would put what Sullivan told you in that category.
Then you should read the vision statement of The Project for a New American Century.
Then today’s NYTimes — review of the first chapter of Melsheimer and Walt’s book on The Israel Lobby.
You can call it anti-semitism all you want. You can distort the truth till you are blue in the face.
When we are in World War III — or, as your friend Norman Podhoretz calls it — World War IV — and the country ….and a LOT of countries are completely devastated — your distortions will become obvious….even to you.
Thanks for this, Steven. And, for the Chris Floyd piece. Excellent.
well, what cold comfort you can here:
way to take a stand harry, you sorry excuse for a majority leader. when are you going to tell lieberman to take a hike?
what BS
lTMF’sA
Yep, courageous all right.