Watching the Chris Matthew’s Show this morning, I saw Andrew Sullivan predict that after Iowa the Republicans will look around, panic, and move to John McCain. Matthews followed up by asking whether Sullivan predicted a McCain win in New Hampshire. Sullivan said ‘no’, but that he might come very close. I have come to the same conclusion.
The reason has many variables but is actually fairly simple. There are no acceptable candidates in the Republican field, but McCain is acceptable to the media and to the Washington Establishment.
When Mitt Romney gave his supposed ‘JFK’ speech explaining his Mormonism, he managed to offend the Republican Establishment. Here’s how Peggy Noonan put it:
His problem, a Romney aide told me, had more to do with a particular fundamentalist strain within evangelical Protestantism…
There was one significant mistake in the speech. I do not know why Romney did not include nonbelievers in his moving portrait of the great American family. We were founded by believing Christians, but soon enough Jeremiah Johnson, and the old proud agnostic mountain men, and the village atheist, and the Brahmin doubter, were there, and they too are part of us, part of this wonderful thing we have. Why did Mr. Romney not do the obvious thing and include them? My guess: It would have been reported, and some idiots would have seen it and been offended that this Romney character likes to laud atheists. And he would have lost the idiot vote.
My feeling is we’ve bowed too far to the idiots. This is true in politics, journalism, and just about everything else.
Noonan isn’t an atheist…she’s Catholic. But she comes from the tolerant wing of the Republican Party. While her attack was ostensibly aimed at Romney, her real target was Mike Huckabee who has been campaigning in Iowa as a ‘Christian Leader’ and using Romney’s Mormonism to rally ‘the idiots’. Interestingly, Noonan doesn’t have a problem with Romney from a policy position, nor does she feel uncomfortable about his faith. She just doesn’t like watching him pander to people that she views with contempt.
If Romney wins the nomination, especially after a bruising contest with Huckabee, it will be a miracle if he gets decent turnout from the evangelical community. Romney has severe electability problems that will only be exacerbated by the types of strategies he will need to knock Huckabee down.
Huckabee has his own electability problems…namely that his views on HIV/AIDS, women, and natural selection are so magical and regressive that the Republican elite won’t stand up for him. The prospect of his nomination is mortifying to the monied interests of the GOP.
Giuliani could theoretically forge a different kind of majority. He could compete in states like New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut, where Republicans have had little recent luck. But that ignores Giuliani’s record and his associations. It is increasingly clear that Giuliani’s biography cannot stand the rigors of a national campaign, and his precipitous drop in the polls reflects that reality.
Many thought these weaknesses in the Republican field could be exploited by former senator Fred Thompson. Yet, recent polls show Thompson polling at 2%-4% in New Hampshire. His campaign has collapsed. Without question, the candidacy of Ron Paul is going to crush Fred Thompson and he will drop out no later than the day after the New Hampshire primary.
As for Ron Paul, he may very well do much better than people anticipate. But it’s impossible to see how he could take his anti-war message all the way to the nomination. And once we dispense with the vanity campaigns of Tom Tancredo and Duncan Hunter, the only man left standing is John McCain. It’s no surprise that McCain just received the endorsements of the Des Moines Register, the Boston Globe, and the Manchester Union-Leader. He will probably win nearly every media endorsement in the nation.
It won’t be easy for McCain. He is polling even with Ron Paul in Iowa and behind Thompson and Giuliani. He will have turn around a near last place finish in Iowa in a week in order to finish strong in the Granite State. And he’ll have to do it without much money. But McCain is currently polling second in New Hampshire behind Romney, and he still retains a lot of popularity from his campaign of 2000.
At some point electability has to enter into the Republican primary voter’s calculus. People thought Giuliani was the electable candidate, but that is the furthest thing from the truth. I still think McCain could emerge as the victor. And he might just be able to hold together the GOP enough to make it a competitive election…especially if his opponent is Hillary Clinton. Clinton is a strong candidate, but she’ll facilitate coalition building for the GOP.
I do not want to see a Clinton-McCain race. It’s the only matchup I think we’d stand a good chance of losing.
You may be right. I am still predicting a fight between Huckabee and an establishment candidate. McCain seems to be the winner of that by default. Here is to hoping they pry their base apart.
Can McCain spin a second place finish in NH into a revived campaign? Or does he have to win in NH?
That is what I can’t figure out. I have never really predicted a winner for NH. My thought it that Romney will eat Iowa dust and Guilliani is in free fall. I think than anyone who loses to Ron Paul and isn’t Huckabee is out.
The question is who do you see beating McCain in NH? My feeling is that the winner of NH will face the winner of Iowa for a long fight. The loser of Iowa can try for a rematch in South Carolina if they want back in.
Romney still has a healthy lead in New Hampshire. He could hang on to beat McCain. He certainly has more money to spend.
How many of those points do you think he can keep after losing Iowa to Huckabee? I do not think that a 13 point gap is enough for Romney. I think his religious supporters will go to Huckabee and his money party voters will got to McCain. McCain will continue to benefit in NH form Guillianni’s fall.
If I were a betting man, I would be shorting Romney (55) in NH and buying McCain (14.6) there.
If Huckabee ends up getting the nomination, he had best make sure he picks a veep candidate at least as batshit crazy as he is. If he picks an establishment guy his Presidency isn’t going to last long.
I know a lot of Republicans that will be too embarrassed to go to Europe and admit that Huckabee is the leader of their party and the POTUS.
If they’re not embarrassed by Bush I don’t see how they’d be embarrassed by anybody else on earth. Even President Huckabee couldn’t bring more worldwide contempt down on America than Bush has.
I generally agree with your analysis, except that I’m not sure that you really have a slam-dunk argument against Romney. In the end, it has to be either Romney or McCain, just because everyone else is just so prima facie ridiculous.
And of course Romney is well funded.
I’ve been getting the same feeling about McCain. Increasingly, the other candidates give the impression that they have no center — they just kind of skitter around looking totally irrelevant. This could, in the voting booth, bring stability/predictability-loving Republicans to McCain, who at least seems to be a known quantity. And I agree that he’d have the best chance among them of winning the general.
But then it’s not been that long ago that I felt sure that Thompson was the one for Dems to fear.
What the Rep’s really need for McCain to win is to actually get the middle of their party out to vote and let the Evangelicals fall where they may.
I’m elated that the Dem party has been and will be again the party that embraces the Hispanic & Black vote, I wouldn’t trade one of them for a thousand Evengelicals.
For all the Rep leadership that made pact after pact in the name of power, there’s now three battles, stop Huckabee’s momentum (to do so carries the good chance of losing Evangelical blocks for the party as a whole), get McCain to the top tier and lastly, McCain’s campaign is $poor, Rep coffers are weeping so to finance McCain in a turnaround may mean the end of some GOP defense funds…
McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone.
I’m sure they would have no shame about making another unconstutional nomination. No doubt the founders meant to say “born somewhere in the Empire.”
Since McCain is a “natural born citizen” of the U.S. is meets the citizenship qualification of Art II, Sect 1.d. of the Constitution.
Re: Peggy Noonan’s “We were founded by believing Christians” — The majority of the principal founders of the U.S. were Deists, not Christians. Try Googling “Thomas Jefferson, Christianity,” for one. But if you repeat something often enough, it becomes the truth, eh?
Yeah…it’s kind of like spitting into the wind to try to change that narrative.
I don’t know if McCain can be sufficiently acceptable to the Republican theo-Cons for them to actually vote for him. I also strongly doubt that he has enough to offer either the Republican leadership or the rank-and-file to get them to settle on him. The alliance between the money-cons and theo-cons that has worked for three decades is coming apart. With no real chance of the Republican nominee winning the general election, none of the groups that make up the Republican Party have sufficient motivation to try to find a unification candidate and get behind him in a serious way.
Since the Reagan administration the conservative movement has been an alliance between the money-Cons and the theo-Cons, with the money-cons providing the Presidential candidates who then tried to speak the religious language of the theo-cons and placate them. But it has actually been a case of the theo-cons being allies to the money-cons, an the money-cons using the theo-cons but looking down on them as unkempt “Yahoos.” The money-Cons were never going to let the theo-cons actually run their own full-blown theo-con candidate.
This primary season is the first time since 1952 that the money-cons have not had a preselected candidate appointed who had the power to run the table and take the nomination. The money-cons thought that had such a candidate in 1952, and the moderate Republicans derailed him and installed Ike. But Ike was acceptable to independent voters in a way no Theo-con ever will be, while the Korean War destroyed any hope for the Democrats to get any nominee elected.
For this election the lack of an appointed money-con candidate-in-waiting has opened up the nomination, and the theo-cons (who have replaced the moderate Republicans as the party’s despised minority) just recently realized that they have one of their own within shooting distance of the nomination – Huckabee.
The reaction of the money-cons to Huckabee has made it clear to the theo-con rank and file that while the theo-cons thought they were in an alliance with the money-cons, the money-cons saw the relationship as more one of the money-cons with their pack of mostly obedient but noisy dogs and yahoos. Good enough to hunt with, but not someone you would invite in to dinner.
Booman’s assumption that the Republican Party leaders will coalesce around the most electable possible nominee is likely to fail because the theo-con followers see that they have a chance to nominate and elect one of their own, and the theo-con leaders have lost control of the followers.
If the Republican leaders of all stripes attempt to install a money-con nominee and unify around him (and McCain is clearly one of those money-cons) the theo-con followers are going to sit out the 2008 election. McCain angered them in 2000, and no amount of groveling is going to get them to vote for a man who clearly dislikes them when they have a real candidate of their own actually running.
I expect Huckabee to collapse as the Press goes after him, but the theo-cons are just going to get angry and demand a miracle from God to get him nominated and elected President. Why should people who already see his breakout from the pack of potential nominees as a God-given miracle give up on him just because the money-cons, their pundits, and the press in general get down on him? What’s their motivation to switch to McCain? McCain, like Huckabee, can’t win the general election without a miracle, and the theo-cons see Huckabee as their real miracle-bait. Why switch?
Super Tuesday, the day on which 24 states hold their nominating primaries and caucuses, will determine the Republican candidate for President. No one is going to unify the republicans – even the leadership – before Feb 5th, and after then it won’t matter.
For McCain to even compete in 24 simultaneous primary contests means that somehow his money has to have started flowing in to him before now, and he has to have troops on the ground in all those states. Take a look at the calendar at Whiskey Tango Foxtrot – over. [Go look – it took me six hours to write the HTML for those tables, debug it to meet Bloggers’ unique nasty little characteristics of throwing all white-space to the screen above the table, and then editing the data to make sure I had it right. Yeah, I am rather proud of that job, and I think is gives the primary season at a glance.}
To get McCain nominated the Republican leaders, both money-cons and theo-cons, have to make nice and unify now if not before, the money has to start flowing to McCain now if not before, and the troops, both money-con and theo-con, have to be convinced to move towards McCain now, if not sooner. I see no evidence that any of this is happening.
If somehow McCain got the nomination, the theo-con followers will sit out the November general election. If somehow Huckabee gets the nomination the money-cons will vote for Hillary before they will vote for that backwoods Yahoo. (That’s the money-con view. Hillary doesn’t threaten the money-con’s beloved Globalization, which Huckabee as a real populist does. The current class-based panic among the Republican pundit class (See Digby.) shows shows both the money-con fear and disdain very clearly.)
I think we are watching the breakup of the money-con <> theo-con alliance that has driven the conservative movement since the 80’s. And the breakup is not at the leadership level. It is at the follower level. The leaders are going where their followers want them to go instead of the traditional Republican top-down leadership model.
For McCain to get the nomination, the leaders have to paper over the breakup and decide on a candidate that is acceptable to both major groups. That will not occur before Feb 5th. After that time, there is no real motivation to unify the party except behind someone who has proven he can bring in the party faithful votes, and that isn’t going to be McCain. McCain is going to be an asterisk in the 24 primary campaigns on Feb 5th.
A unification candidate for the Republicans could only happen if the Republican party, both leaders and followers, felt that the Republican nominee had a real chance to win the general election. The combination of the Iraq War dragging on, the coming 2008 recession, and the obvious Republican corruption and incompetence at running government, all combine to make the likelihood of a Republican winning the Presidency in 2008 about as likely as drawing a Royal Flush from the top of a well-shuffled deck with three Aces removed. Unless there are real stakes on the table, it is going to be every individual in the Republican Party for himself. There is nothing to be won by unifying the party behind a single nominee because none of the current pack are electable in the general election, and no “Ike” waiting in the wings.
The Republican Party position is like the difference between playing poker for money or for matchsticks. The players have no real motivation to act reasonably if all they are going to lose is pieces of worthless cardboard. They aren’t going to unify on a candidate for the general election because the Republicans have already lost it, and they know that. All the Republican players are now playing the game to stake their positions within the party for the future. McCain, at age 71, has no place in the future of the Republican party.
With Hillary and Obama dominating the Democratic Party nomination and the equally attractive Edwards (my preference) waiting in the wings should either of the other two falter, I don’t think anything that happens in the Democratic nomination is going to change the Republican calculus.
That’s my current opinion, and I think it will remain valid until Feb 5th, after which time all current bets are off the table.