Originally posted at My Left Wing
As this primary season progresses, it’s hard not to be reminded of the ups and downs–ultimately, mostly downs–of the primary season in 2004. And also the sheer ugliness (in my opinion) that can mark some of the political discourse. I remember leaving the room when John Kerry was levelling an attack against Howard Dean (and therefore against values of mine that had prompted my involvement in politics for the first time in my life.) Even though Howard Dean was still way up in the polls, I knew it was theoretically still possible for Kerry to win the nomination, and I didn’t want to get so disgusted with him that I would have a hard time voting for him in the general election. A similar motivation has kept me from reading the “why I support Candidate X” threads, because I know the comments will include some ugly attacks. A lot of people on blogs don’t mind that kind of interaction, but I’m kind of a misfit in that regard. I see (via the “recent comments” feature) that name-calling, insults, and attacks are taking place, and that is my cue to “assume the position”.
What I’ve written so far isn’t the confession part yet. This is…
I was in college during the 1984 election. I didn’t watch news, although I had a sense that it was something I should be doing. Because, like eating my vegetables, it was supposed to be good for me. But I didn’t. On the other hand, it was the first election in which I would be able to vote, and I knew that voting was a Good Thing. Voting was an Important and Patriotic activity.
And apparently, as you were leaving the polls, you were even given a little sticker announcing that you voted today. Stickers are good. They’re kind of like the gold stars teachers sometimes put on your papers, and I’d been awarded my share of those in my younger days. In college, of course, one doesn’t get gold stars, but scores higher than 90 or a letter A on your paper or test. And I got a lot of those in college. Even on papers I had written at the last minute, literally in the typewriter, with no rough draft, and no sleep the night before.
Why am I going on about the grades issue? To let you know that, even though I was a political airhead, I certainly was not dumb in any traditional sense of the word. But I wasn’t tuned in to politics at all. At the time, I don’t think I could have told you the main difference between a Democrat and a Republican. I had a vague sense that I didn’t want Reagan to be president any more. But I don’t think primary elections were even on my radar at that time. When it came to the general election, all I had to go on was what had filtered through to newspaper headlines and the occasional soundbite I accidentally heard if someone else flipped the television in the commons to the news channel.
And all I got from that was that I didn’t “like” either of these guys. But I knew that as a good American, it was my Patriotic Duty to vote at election time. So I did. For the Communist, as I recall. It was a vote for “none of the above”. I became a somewhat better informed citizen in the elections that followed. By the time we moved out to Ohio for graduate school, Demetrius and I identified as Democrats. But we still weren’t tuned in to primaries. I’ve heard that some people harbor resentment against Al Gore because of the way he attacked Bill Bradley in the primaries. That wasn’t an issue for me, because I wasn’t aware of that primary season–maybe I was, vaguely, at the time, but it certainly didn’t leave any lasting impression on me. At that time, I was raising two small children and teaching part time in the evenings.
I did tune in, for the first time in my life, to debates and news coverage in time for the general election in 2000. By that time, thank goodness, there was The Daily Show, which allowed me to learn the bullet points of what was happening in the political world without actually watching the news. I knew enough about the political scene at that point to be acutely, painfully aware of what happened in Bush v. Gore. And I was aware of what was going on after September 11, when our unelected “plainspoken” president transformed into The Decider.
It’s a little embarrassing to share all of this, and I know that I’m potentially opening myself up to ridicule. But I guess I’ve decided I’m okay with that, because I’m already feeling very much like an outsider in the blogosphere. And while maybe this can be dismissed as just one woman’s story, maybe it can give just a tiny bit of insight into the way people who are not political junkies–but whose votes are still counted equally–might be perceiving this election.
As I wrote yesterday in the comments at MLW, my main point in this essay is that there are non-mentally impaired people out there who vote for trivial reasons, based on “gut reactions”, or without in depth knowledge of positions and policies. It was a piece of insight I had to offer that I thought might be useful.
And while there’s no going back and “taking the blue pill”, I know that I need to stay out of the proverbial mudpit where so many other people are wrestling right now.
I think some people who read my post over there thought I was being hard on myself, but that wasn’t really my intention. It was more my way of trying to suggest that we shouldn’t vote “dumb voters” too harshly, because I know how easy it can be for thoughtful, intelligent citizens to just not be tuned in to politics beyond headlines and gut impressions–which can be pretty easily manipulated by the memes repeated by the media.
I think this is a great essay.
And it’s something that nearly everybody went through (the exceptions being those raised in activist families!). Hell, I didn’t start paying attention until about October 2004!
While I’m here, a couple of things I find funny about the whole ‘politically informed’ thing:
Information is power.
The conundrum is that elections are decided by people with a low amount of information.
This puts a premium on sub-rational aspects of electioneering, which places the unscrupulous at an advantage.
And it’s hard for those that are informed to forgive the uninformed for this state of nature.
I could launch into an explanation of how the central versus peripheral routes of persuasion apply here, being the psychology geek that I am. But right now I actually have to go teach a psych class.
Weeelllll, there are many voters on the other side of the aisle who are very informed about the issues and vote accordingly. You CAN be well-informed and draw different conclusions depending on what is important to you. You can’t lay the blame for undesirable political outcomes solely at the feet of “uninformed” voters. We all have the right and the responsibility to be part of the process, and no one should be condescended to for the way they make their decisions. Perhaps if more than 30% of “informed” voters would go to the polls it would cancel out those of us who admit to using a little bit of intuition in our selection process.
Technically, that’s true. Rationally, that’s true. But we’re not talking about rationality, technically. Honest differences of opinions can be discussed/debated, but people who are ambivalent about the things that matter most to you will often prompt an emotional, i.e. irrational, response.
DON’T YOU GET IT?!?!?!?
Which response puts most of them further off caring.
It’s very hard to convince true believers of this, but it IS possible for people of good will to look at the same set of facts and arrive at different conclusions due to differences in backgrounds, perspectives, and priorities, and the more the believers push the less likely they are to get the results they’re hoping for.
I will probably, sometime in the next week, stop following national politics entirely until November 1…. because I’m already so goddam fed up with the various evangelists that I’m ready to burn my registration certificate and move.
Yup.
And I “get” why it’s happening. I know that people feel passionately about their candidates, and they acutely feel the sting of various events, negative diaries, biased news stories, etc. And I also get that people will be more intense with their rhetoric and less careful with their wording on blogs than they would ever be face to face.
But, dang! It’s a bit much.
We did away with our TV almost a year and a half ago and its made election season so much more comfortable at our house. I’m deeply involved at the local level of politics as an elected official and precinct committeeman so I get quite enough input without being yammered at by mindless commercials. I don’t mind thoughtful criticism at all, but, on the other hand, I don’t feel obligated to read or otherwise get caught up in the strident negative crap that turns up on occasion. I’ve heard “Take what you need and leave the rest” is very good advice. At least it works for me.
Thanks for your thoughts, Renee. I suspect you wouldn’t be around here as much as you are if you didn’t care pretty deeply.
{You can’t lay the blame for undesirable political outcomes solely at the feet of “uninformed” voters. }
yes you can.
i think it might be most valid reason.
Hey, there was a time I didn’t know what a primary was too. We all had to learn, somewhere along the way.
We should all be gentle with each other. I know it’s hard. And this sounds all new-agey, and I can’t stand that, but it’s really true. We have to be the change we seek. Want government to be more compassionate? That means we bloggers have to be more compassionate to each other, online, first.
Thanks for sharing, and for being brave, and for figuring out what matters. Not everyone does, you know.