Ali Abunimah posted this article on The Electronic Intifada on 5 November 2008. This is a Lazy Quote Diary, where I don’t have much more to say than the author. Enjoy this exposition of where Obama is likely to go with a hardline Israeli citizen in the White House. There is no question that George Bush, by demanding a halt to the 42 year long military occupation of the Palestinians and the creation of an independent, contiguous and sovereign Palestinian state was way ahead of Obama even before he takes office.
During the United States election campaign, racists and pro-Israel hardliners tried to make an issue out of President-elect Barack Obama’s middle name, Hussein. Such people might take comfort in another middle name, that of Obama’s pick for White House Chief of Staff: Rahm Israel Emanuel.
Emanuel is Obama’s first high-level appointment and it’s one likely to disappointment those who hoped the president-elect would break with the George W. Bush Administration’s pro-Israel policies. White House Chief of Staff is often considered the most powerful office in the executive branch, next to the president. Obama has offered Emanuel the position according to Democratic party sources cited by media including Reuters and The New York Times. While Emanuel is expected to accept the post, that had not been confirmed by Wednesday evening the day after the election.
Rahm Emanuel was born in Chicago, Illinois in 1959, the son of Benjamin Emanuel, a pediatrician who helped smuggle weapons to the Irgun, the Zionist militia of former Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, in the 1940s. The Irgun carried out numerous terrorist attacks on Palestinian civilians including the bombing of Jerusalem’s King David Hotel in 1946.
Emanuel continued his father’s tradition of active support for Israel; during the 1991 Gulf War he volunteered to help maintain Israeli army vehicles near the Lebanon border when southern Lebanon was still occupied by Israeli forces.
As White House political director in the first Clinton administration, Emanuel orchestrated the famous 1993 signing ceremony of the “Declaration of Principles” between Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin. Emanuel was elected to Congress representing a north Chicago district in 2002 and he is credited with a key role in delivering a Democratic majority in the 2006 mid-term elections. He has been a prominent supporter of neoliberal economic policies on free trade and welfare reform.
One of the most influential politicians and fundraisers in his party, Emanuel accompanied Obama to a meeting of AIPAC’s executive board just after the Illinois senator had addressed the pro-Israel lobby’s conference last June.
In Congress, Emanuel has been a consistent and vocal pro-Israel hardliner, sometimes more so than President Bush. In June 2003, for example, he signed a letter criticizing Bush for being insufficiently supportive of Israel. “We were deeply dismayed to hear your criticism of Israel for fighting acts of terror,” Emanuel, along with 33 other Democrats wrote to Bush. The letter said that Israel’s policy of assassinating Palestinian political leaders “was clearly justified as an application of Israel’s right to self-defense” (“Pelosi supports Israel’s attacks on Hamas group,” San Francisco Chronicle, 14 June 2003).
(Aside, of course, Israel’s incessant military occupation and confiscation of Palestinian lands, its colonialism of what is left of Palestine, the West Bank and East Jerusalem, has nothing to do with the Palestinian fight to hold onto their lands and their fight for freedom and self-determination. And of course, who doesn’t know that the anti-Hamas rhetoric from Israel and its servant, the US State Department, and its right wing Zionist supporters, is a red herring to avoid peace initiatives.)
In July 2006, Emanuel was one of several members who called for the cancellation of a speech to Congress by visiting Iraqi prime minister Nouri al-Maliki because al-Maliki had criticized Israel’s bombing of Lebanon. Emanuel called the Lebanese and Palestinian governments “totalitarian entities with militias and terrorists acting as democracies” in a 19 July 2006 speech supporting a House resolution backing Israel’s bombing of both countries that caused thousands of civilian victims.
Emanuel has sometimes posed as a defender of Palestinian lives, though never from the constant Israeli violence that is responsible for the vast majority of deaths and injuries. On 14 June 2007 he wrote to US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice “on behalf of students in the Gaza Strip whose future is threatened by the ongoing fighting there” which he blamed on “the violence and militancy of their elders.” In fact, the fighting between members of Hamas and Fatah, which claimed dozens of lives, was the result of a failed scheme by US-backed militias to violently overthrow the elected Hamas-led national unity government. Emanuel’s letter urged Rice “to work with allies in the region, such as Egypt and Jordan, to either find a secure location in Gaza for these students, or to transport them to a neighboring country where they can study and take their exams in peace.” Palestinians often view such proposals as a pretext to permanently “transfer” them from their country, as many Israeli leaders have threatened. Emanuel has never said anything in support of millions of Palestinian children whose education has been disrupted by Israeli occupation, closures and blockades.
Emanuel has also used his position to explicitly push Israel’s interests in normalizing relations with Arab states and isolating Hamas. In 2006 he initiated a letter to President Bush opposing United Arab Emirates (UAE)-based Dubai Ports World’s attempt to buy the management business of six US seaports. The letter, signed by dozens of other lawmakers, stated that “The UAE has pledged to provide financial support to the Hamas-led government of the Palestinian Authority and openly participates in the Arab League boycott against Israel.” It argued that allowing the deal to go through “not only could place the safety and security of US ports at risk, but enhance the ability of the UAE to bolster the Hamas regime and its efforts to promote terrorism and violence against Israel” (“Dems Tie Israel, Ports,” Forward, 10 March 2006).
Ira Forman, executive director of the National Jewish Democratic Council, told Fox News that picking Emanuel is “just another indication that despite the attempts to imply that Obama would somehow appoint the wrong person or listen to the wrong people when it comes to the US-Israel relationship … that was never true.”
Over the course of the campaign, Obama publicly distanced himself from friends and advisers suspected or accused of having “pro-Palestinian” sympathies. There are no early indications of a more balanced course.
Emanuel has dual citizenship and is an Israeli legally as well as an American. Does anyone believe that placing him within the White House will foster an eventual peace between the Israelis and Palestinians?
technically all Jews are citizens of Israel. Many other countries offer dual citizenship: Italians, Canadians are examples…travel on two passports.
I would not be concerned about Rahm. You need a hardliner so Israel won’t be able to squeal..you don’t understand…we’re threatened. You also need someone who understands the root cause of Arab distress and that we’re in the 21st century..that after 60 years on, it’s time to resolve this intractable..
With a Jew as CoS, the second most powerful person after the President, Israelis won’t be questioning President Obama. When the CoS speaks, he speaks for the President.
from Goldberg who knows Rahm very, very well:
but I get sick of the kind of mentality that says Palestinians have “dysfunction”, Iran has “extremism”, but Israel has “foibles”.
Just a lapse on idredit’s part, but I don’t think the quote necessarily represents his own views. He is pretty much aware of the propaganda and lies that pervade the IP area.
As for the quoted material, on the other hand, you are perfectly correct.
oh yes, I realize that. It was Goldberg I was talking about, I didn’t mean it to sound like I was snarking at idredit.
Sorry about the misapplication for your statement.
through the filter of Glenn Greenwald. Be sure to check Goldberg’s email, linked in update III.
Probably parts of this are still on Goldberg’s mind? An interesting filter to use when looking forward to now, from that point in May.
“You also need someone who understands the root cause of Arab distress“
And who might that be? I don’t see anyone like that so far, nor do I see any sign that anyone like that is in the wings about to be introduced.
Rahm Emanuel is one of the biggest hawks in the democratic party. I don’t see him encouraging Israel to make any kind of settlement that the Palestinians could accept.
I really don’t like Emanuel either, but more for being a DLC Dem (what was the reason that we were backing Obama instead of Hillary again?) than for his attitude to Israel. To be fair, I guess it’s true what the talking heads are saying about Emanuel that “he gets things done”, and that’s something you want in a chief of staff. Chiefs of staff are not meant to have much of an input into policy, as far as I understand.
It will be interesting to see who Obama chooses as his Secretary of State and National Security Adviser, which may be more significant as far as I/P is concerned. Not that I expect Obama to even make motions for doing something positive about I/P, in his first term at least.
But I’m not sure that it’s helpful to say that Bush is “way ahead of Obama” on this. As far as I can tell, all Bush has done is make noises.
“Way ahead” is perhaps too strong of a statement, but we did not hear what Obama’s position is during the campaign, except as can be inferred from Biden’s non-response during the VP debate, when Palin came out for “two states,” presumably McCain’s position, which followed directly from Annapolis and the Bush plan concerning the IP situation: the military occupation, which started in 1967 must stop, and an independent, contiguous and sovereign Palestinian state must be created.
We have not heard anything close to this position from the Obama-Biden camp, except perhaps avoidance of the issue. So relatively speaking, Bush is ahead of Obama, even if he was too late to be able to impose it on Israel.
If Bush is for a two-state solution, that makes me think that maybe it’s not a good idea. See Obama, Emanuel and Israel:
Personally, I don’t think a one state solution is what Bibi has in mind as a solution either. His basic problem, given his right wing Likud Zionist nationist position, is how to get rid of the Palestinians and take it all. That is insoluble for the Likuds, but it does not mean that they would be willing to give the Palestinians any rights to live as equal citizens in Israel or a binational Israel-Palestinian state.
Most likely, the Likuds, if permitted, will offer a bantustan existence for the Palestinians, perhaps being allowed to work as cheap labor in Israel, but no independent state.
I don’t think that this solution is what the Palestinians have in mind. My feeling is that the one state solution proposed by some Palestinians is merely a threat to where the Zionist nationalists are going.
Here is part of the reaction of Rahm Emanuel’s father, the former Irgun terrorist, to his son’s appointment as printed in Ma’ariv:
“Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel… Why wouldn’t he be? What is he, an Arab? He’s not going to clean the floors of the White House.”
Typical right wing Israeli racist.
Sad commentary from…whatever he is today. The Irgun was a terrorist organization, and its involvement in massacres of Palestinian civilians during the preIndependence period makes this statement all the more tragic. No insight.
His apppointment was a mistake. He will be the burr under the blanket of this administration, and if he is not removed in time he will be its downfall.
Watch.
AG
To soon to tell what this appointment means for the Middle East, which is this author’s concern. There have been political shifts toward the left from hardliners in Israel, like the Likud members who went Kadima, and people like Olmert talking up a Palestinian state after resigning office.
Looks as if we will have to wait and learn when the time comes.