Nate was pretty accurate on the rest of the elections, but I’m not sure he’s got it here. Last I looked, Coleman was ahead with about 70% of the votes counted and the challenges not being considered for several days. I wonder what he knows that the Minnesota papers and Public TV don’t.
His math is laid out in the article and it is quite complex… for a non-math guy like me it seems like magic.
If Nate hits it on the mark, watch Coleman take it to court.
You can read his article here.
