I like the appointment of Eric Shinseki to head the Veteran’s Department, and for many of the reasons that E.J. Dionne lays out. I’ve been thinking a lot lately about how Democrats relate to the military and intelligence community, and it’s just a fact that there is an unhealthy level of mutual distrust between the Left and those in charge of national security. We have to repair the rift because the Democrats are going to take over the whole enchilada in little over a month. When the CIA/Pentagon does something, they will essentially be doing it in the name of the Democratic Party.
I think the key (and this applies equally to both sides) is to listen more carefully. The CIA, if they’re being honest with themselves, should now see the wisdom of a lot the Left’s critique of our foreign and intelligence policy over the last fifty years. They have noticed that it was the Left that defended their performance on pre-war intelligence and that defended the honor of Valerie Plame Wilson. They should also notice that the Left is not defending torture and extraordinary renditions.
But we have to listen to the CIA, too, when they tell us who the bad guys were and who was fighting the good fight on the inside against the abuses of the Bush administration. And we should not be asking for everyone’s head on a pike. Our party is going to be responsible for running the CIA and we want it to perform its core functions at a high level. We need experienced people to accomplish that. If there is going to be accountability for Bush-era abuses, it should start at the very top. This was never a case of a few bad apples. These problems evolved out of direct orders from Bush, Cheney, Addington, and Libby.
Obama should not be rewarding those that went along with torturing people, but we have to remember that part of the problem came from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel assuring the CIA that they were not breaking the law. We have to have accountability, but we also have to balance that with creating an effective, functioning government. There are some bad apples in the CIA that should be removed or whose promotions should be blocked. But civilians, on the outside, are not in a good position to make those distinctions.
And we can say the same things about the Pentagon. The Pentagon spent the Bush years developing a reputation for doing things like spying on anti-war Quakers and letting the procurement office become a house of corruption. It probably needs a more thorough housecleaning than the CIA. The Obama administration must resist the urge to spare Bob Gates embarrassment, as they go about cleaning up the rot that has developed in the Pentagon.
Obama has reached out to the military so far, and with good governance the breech between the culture of the left and the culture of the military will largely disappear. But, first, we have to be willing to listen and learn from each other’s earned wisdom.
I’ve thought for a couple decades now that the CIA and most of the rest of the “intelligence” establishment should be shut down and their mission redefined with new players. I can’t think of any unambiguous wins they’ve had since WWII, and a lot of cost and trampling on American liberties on the other side of the balance.
As to the military, we can’t shut them down, but they need to be slapped down and put back in their place. We’re seeing too many active generals talking politics and policy where they have no business being. Having a moron as commander in chief has taught them lesson they need to unlearn fast. And the rest of us need to get over the childish military-worship we’ve fallen into.
yeah, I think you’ve fairly represented one side of that mutual mistrust.
“the childish military-worship we’ve fallen into“
Can we please start by rescinding the requirement to always prefix the words troops and military with “our brave, moral, and glorious”?
Booman Tribune ~ Trust and Accountability
don’t forget ‘internationally unaccountable‘…
Oh, yes, and can we please outlaw the ludicrously hyperbolically poetic term “wounded warriors”?
Folks concerned about the CIA should read Tim Weiner’s Legacy of Ashes. Even on their own terms, our spooks have not been very good at their jobs.
Where I agree with Booman is that I think we on the left need to understand that most folks in most circumstances are trying to “do the right thing” and to do their jobs honorably. We think they’ve been sent off in wrong directions by elites (and they have!) but most of the people who get dug into these institutions don’t start out as bad people — or very different from some of us. We need to honor that part of them while restraining the institutions that have been molded by wrong policies.
Nobody starts out as a bad person.
It’s difficult to strike a balance between fighting back against Bushian abuses and keeping civilian control over the military, for example. There are somethings like torture that are obvious, but in other situations it’s murkier.
“There are somethings like torture that are obvious, but in other situations it’s murkier.“
Like what? Flattening major cities (think Falluja, a city that WAS about the size of Cincinnati). Using white posphorus? Breaking into homes and detaining 83 year old men with advanced Parkinson’s disease and refusing to release them unless they tell you whether they are Sunni or Shi`a (happened to a former neighbor of mine)?
Or how about committing the ultimate crime against humanity – launching a war of naked aggression?
You know, I have an idea for how to avoid these and other “murkier” situations. Stop using the military to try to dominate and impose the U.S.’s will on the world. Reserve the military strictly for self defense in the REAL sense of the term.
When was the last time the U.S. military was used for self defense?
WWII.
Good answer. Though there are good arguments on both sides of that question, I can accept the position that joining WW II was justified for a number of reasons.
Since then, though, it’s never once been even a little bit about self defense, nor is the United States’ pervasive military presence all over the bloody world remotely about self-defense. It’s about a lot of things, including but not limited to keeping the military-industrial complex alive and healthy, but self defense is not one of them.
WAR! UH! What is it good for?
Well, all kinds of things, really.
But that doesn’t justify it, now does it?
it seems like the future role of the military will inreasingly be policing and peacekeeping, rather than ‘schock and/awe’, videogame fireworks that anonymously vaporize human flesh instatntly, or ‘xmas gifts’ of cluster bombs that ‘keep on giving’…
low ratings stuff…
seriously, i’d like to see the militaries of all the nations involved in massive tree planting missions to stay fit, and prepared to go oust a maniac or three every so often.
zimbabwe anyone?