I don’t always agree with Glenn Greenwald but I respect him because he understands reality.
In the United States, what Obama did yesterday is simply not done. American Presidents do not disseminate to the world documents which narrate in vivid, elaborate detail the dirty, illegal deeds done by the CIA, especially not when the actions are very recent, were approved and ordered by the President of the United States, and the CIA is aggressively demanding that the documents remain concealed and claiming that their release will harm national security. When is the last time a President did that?
The answer is: never.
The only parallel in U.S. history was in 1973, when then-CIA director James Schlesinger commissioned the Family Jewels report in response to learning that elements within the Agency had helped Nixon carry out his dirty tricks.
The Schlesinger directive, drafted by deputy director for operations William Colby, commanded senior CIA officials to report immediately on any current or past Agency matters that might fall outside CIA authority. By the end of May, Colby had been named to succeed Schlesinger as DCI, and his loose-leaf notebook of memos totaled 693 pages [see John Prados, Lost Crusader: The Secret Wars of CIA Director William Colby (Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 259-260.]
Seymour Hersh broke the story of CIA’s illegal domestic operations with a front page story in the New York Times on December 22, 1974 (“Huge C.I.A. Operation Reported in U.S. Against Antiwar Forces, Other Dissidents in Nixon Years”), writing that “a check of the CIA’s domestic files ordered last year… produced evidence of dozens of other illegal activities… beginning in the nineteen fifties, including break-ins, wiretapping, and the surreptitious inspection of mail.”
On December 31, 1974, CIA director Colby and the CIA general counsel John Warner met with the deputy attorney general, Laurence Silberman, and his associate, James Wilderotter, to brief Justice “in connection with the recent New York Times articles” on CIA matters that “presented legal questions.” Colby’s list included 18 specifics:
1. Confinement of a Russian defector that “might be regarded as a violation of the kidnapping laws.”
2. Wiretapping of two syndicated columnists, Robert Allen and Paul Scott.
3. Physical surveillance of muckraker Jack Anderson and his associates, including current Fox News anchor Brit Hume.
4. Physical surveillance of then Washington Post reporter Michael Getler.
5. Break-in at the home of a former CIA employee.
6. Break-in at the office of a former defector.
7. Warrantless entry into the apartment of a former CIA employee.
8. Mail opening from 1953 to 1973 of letters to and from the Soviet Union.
9. Mail opening from 1969 to 1972 of letters to and from China.
10. Behavior modification experiments on “unwitting” U.S. citizens.
11. Assassination plots against Castro, Lumumba, and Trujillo (on the latter, “no active part” but a “faint connection” to the killers).
12. Surveillance of dissident groups between 1967 and 1971.
13. Surveillance of a particular Latin American female and U.S. citizens in Detroit.
14. Surveillance of a CIA critic and former officer, Victor Marchetti.
15. Amassing of files on 9,900-plus Americans related to the antiwar movement.
16. Polygraph experiments with the San Mateo, California, sheriff.
17. Fake CIA identification documents that might violate state laws.
18. Testing of electronic equipment on US telephone circuits.
The only difference is that we have so far, as a nation, refused to acknowledge that the trauma of the Bush years was worse than Watergate and act accordingly. Obama deserves praise for attempting the Wisdom of Solomon, but this baby can’t be split. It all needs to come out and high-level people need to go to jail.
And what was William Colby’s thanks?
link
link
Sure. I believe that.
Agreed, 100%.
Adding, that’s UUUUGLY about Bill Colby.
Not exactly a group I’d want to invite to my house for a party.
Just because something is “never” done, does not mean it shouldn`t be.
The whole world has known what was going on, & the, seemingly, lack of priority attention, to these war crimes, not only allows them to be repeated in the future, but gives the green light to any country to openly give any captives, military or civilian, the same or worse treatment.
When the burnt, crisp bodies of American contractors, hanging from a bridge were shown worldwide, the hue & cry was amazingly loud.
Yet, when a number of “browns, wearing underwear headgear”, die at the hands of American torturers, who “serve courageously on the front lines of a dangerous world”, they aren`t liable for prosecution. To make it even worse, The American government will provide legal experts & expend all resources necessary in defense of any one of these criminals, at any time, & at any place.
While making the statements of absolution for the perpetrators of these crimes, not one single word was spoken in regards to those who were tortured and/or died.
I realize there is no word yet that I know of, that could diminish the despair of those tortured or the families of those dead or disappeared, but a little mention would have been nice.
But American exceptionalism does not allow for that I guess.
we’d rather deny bad things were done and become the bad guys ourselves than admit our nation can be legitimately criticized for how its officials have acted.
Yes, And that`s like putting the sins of the father onto the son.
I think Obama’s team may have learned the rules of blackmail in the reverse direction, as someone said here yesterday or earlier today.
Instead of cowering when the CIA threatened him if he exposed the docs, I think they went to the CIA and said look, play nice and we won’t prosecute.
It’s a fascinating and appropriate turn of events!
A Faustian bargain.
It’s pretty telling that there has been nothing, 0 on the front page about the memos at Open Left. (There was a quick hit I think).
Not. A. Damn. Thing.
They have their story, and they’re sticking to it. I expect the first call there for impeachment to show up before Memorial Day.
No doubt.
I’m surprised they haven’t called for it yet.
Here’s something we won’t be prosecuting anyone for:
COMMENTER AT D-KOS-on “The Water cure.”
It’s also known as the “water cure.” A fluid (not
always water) is forced down a victim’s throat. The victim, who must drink or drown, often passes out, is beaten, reawakened, vomits (or is forced to vomit), and the torturer begins again.
The usual result is death, unless the victim is very lucky and/or the torturer tires of it.
See the February 25, 2008 New Yorker Article “The Water Cure” and the Wikipedia article for more details.
The torture doesn’t seem to have had legal approval in the U.S., as one Army judge suspended and fined a Major for using the torture during the Spanish-American war.
However, it appears that Theodore Roosevelt did approve of it, considered it “mild,” claimed that its origins were Filipino, and justified its implementation by saying that “the Filipinos had inflicted incredible tortures on our people.”
But according to one soldier who assisted in torturing 160 Filipinos, only 26 survived.
Here are some accounts (from the Wikipedia article):
Lieutenant Grover Flint during the Philippine-American War:
“A man is thrown down on his back and three or four men sit or stand on his arms and legs and hold him down; and either a gun barrel or a rifle barrel or a carbine barrel or a stick as big as a belaying pin…is simply thrust into his jaws and his jaws are thrust back…
In the case of very old men I have seen their teeth fall out… He is simply held down and then water is poured onto his face down his throat and nose from a jar; and that is kept up until the man gives some sign or becomes unconscious.
And, when he becomes unconscious, he is simply rolled aside and he is allowed to come to…A man suffers tremendously, there is no doubt about it. His sufferings must be that of a man who is drowning, but cannot drown.”
In his book The Forging of the American Empire Sidney Lens recounted:
A reporter for the New York Evening Post (April 8, 1902) gave some harrowing details. The native, he said, is thrown on the ground, his arms and legs pinned down, and head partially raised “so as to make pouring in the water an easier matter”.
If the prisoner tries to keep his mouth closed, his nose is pinched to cut off the air and force him to open his mouth, or a bamboo stick is put in the opening.
In this way water is steadily poured in, one, two, three, four, five gallons, until the body becomes “an object frighful to contemplate”.
In this condition, of course, speech is impossibly, so the water is squeezed out of the victim, sometimes naturally, and sometimes – as a young soldier with a smile told the correspondent – “we jump on them to get it out quick.” One or two such treatments and the prisoner either talks or dies.[2]
More than a hundred years later and only the names of the protagonists have changed.
Dump Jean Schmidt.
by Xapulin on Sat Apr 18, 2009 at 05:12:29 AM PDT
[ Parent | Reply to This | RecommendHide ]