United States: catalyst for peace or financier of conflict? Ask Congress to investigate tax dollars used to harm civilians in Gaza.
So says the sign on this truck, parked outside of the site of the AIPAC Conference going on May 3-5, which was paid for by Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP). It is nice to know that AIPAC will not get into and out of town without some comment on its perennial function: to get the US Congress to continue military aid and funding to Israel, free and clear without any limitations on its uses. Palestinians on the ground in Gaza during Israel’s invasion reported “Made in USA” on weapons used to kill innocent civilians including entire families and over 400 children. Phosphorous bombs, DIME munitions, the planes the dropped them, the tanks that shelled homes and even UN facilities where many civilians sought refuge in vain, were of American origin.
JVP’s message:
Here’s a little something we’ve kept to ourselves until today… Why? Well, we wanted to make sure the truck pictured here was already rolling on the streets in front of the AIPAC Conference and the US Capitol.
In our line of justice work, you never know if a contract will get canceled at the last minute, or if other, bigger trucks will show up on the scene.
But we’re happy to report we’re on the ground in Washington, DC along with volunteer activists who are handing out flyers and talking to attendees.
From May 3-5, AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, is holding the country’s largest annual gathering of activists, students and political leaders dedicated to “supporting Israel.” But we wanted to be there with our message because we think their right-wing agenda actually harms Israelis, harms Palestinians and harms all of us who want justice, peace and stability in the region.
As Vice-President Joe Biden and countless members of Congress make their appearance at the annual AIPAC Conference in DC, they are being met with JVP’s message of hope and accountability about US funds and Gaza.
They will see that many of us–you and me–care for both Israelis and Palestinians and ask our government to do the same.
Surely at the conference many will speak about peace. In fact, the conference platform talks about ‘peace principles.’ But simply talking about peace is cheap.
AIPAC insists on more unconditional military aid to Israel, without taking stock of–or even mentioning–the attacks on civilians in Gaza.
AIPAC decries any divestment from the Israeli occupation–do they even know there’s an occupation?–but pushes for divestment from Iran. We are there now to remind them that there are real people and real lives being destroyed by US support for the occupation.
Please help us bring accountability to Washington, DC. It’s our money, our choice.
Thanks
If you would like to help JVP cover the $5,000 it cost to put this important message in front of the AIPAC attendees, and the journalists covering them, click HERE.
I realized we’re in for little to no change when I heard candidate Obama reciting the same ol’ AIPAC rhetoric, i.e. “Israel is our friend, surrounded by enemies, we must help Israel, blah, blah, blah”.
again I ask, HOW is this (and several other major policy areas) one iota different from what McCain would be saying/doing had he been elected POTUS?
there is no difference.
of course you can’t really peg the current ten year “aid” (money, weapons, money, weapons, etc.) plan for Israel– since that deal went down last August, behind closed doors and barely any coverage from MSM. do people realize these aid packages are not debated on in congress, approved by congress?
what gives?
The Israel is friend and ally message precedes all speeches by American politicians, if they want to play the game. It is what comes afterward where progress is made.
AIPAC has been a right wing Likud supporter for a couple of decades now so that any president that comes forth with a plan to enact the two states solution is 180 degrees from AIPAC goals.
Yes Obama did sign off on the ten year aid package, but in the end, it is his pen that is needed to implement it. And in the end, that is what it may come to. Does Obama have the balls to confront Israel in that manner? We may have to wait in order to find out.
Cynthia Mckinney explains it:
AIPAC and Congress marriage:
http://theinfounderground.com/archives/TiU.Radio.30th.April.09-guest.Cynthia.McKinney.mp3
Over heard at AIPAC & several Haaretz articles…
http://www.freespeechzoneblog.com/diary/4198/over-heard-at-aipac-several-haaretz-articles
.
(The Hill) – Biden also stressed the importance of a two-state solution — a key issue in talks later Tuesday with Israeli President Shimon Peres and with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on May 18 — receiving a mixed reaction from the crowd.
Obama and Biden a Zionist
Biden added that Obama had a “personal connection to the Zionist idea.” In the introduction of the vice president, the crowd was reminded several times that Biden has called himself a Zionist.
“There must always be a place for the Jews to go and that place must be Israel,” the vice president said to a standing ovation.
…
Biden was preceded at AIPAC by his successor as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), who called America’s commitment to Israel “a matter of gut and heart.”
…
AIPAC spokesman Joshua Block told The Hill that at the conclusion of the three-day conference Tuesday, the pro-Israel group had 515 lobbying appointments scheduled on Capitol Hill.
U.S. Jews Create New Lobby to Temper Israel Policy
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
It is probably to Biden’s credit that he was able to kiss ass at the same time laying the law down: two states is on the US agenda. That is of course a terrible message for the Likud Lobby, which is what AIPAC has become.
Netanyahu will not be pleased with the views he knows will be repeated by the Obama administration. The big question is: where will Obama go once Bibi tells him off?
Don’t Israeli voters have some responsibility here? why do they keep putting the same old socks (Bibi, etc.) in office if they actually want progress?
Your question is self explanatory.
Depends what you mean by progress, doesn’t it?
Justin Raimondo at Antiwar.com
I will watch with great interest whether the Obama administration goes through with this.
.
(Haaretz) – U.S. nuclear policy has long demonstrated a kind of split personality. Washington’s public declarations urge universal compliance with the NPT. This was the spirit in which Tuesday’s remarks were made (and occasional others like it in the past). But Israeli experts noticed a softer tone this time – Israel and its fellow “refuseniks” were not called on to sign the treaty and relinquish their nuclear capabilities, but simply to “adhere” to the document, a seemingly less threatening phrase.
On the practical level, Washington recognizes the unique positions that Israel, India and Pakistan are all in, all of them important American allies.
Israel’s nuclear policy – its infamous “ambiguity” – is based on an unwritten 1969 agreement between then-prime minister Golda Meir and American president Richard Nixon, according to which, experts believe, Israel maintains nuclear ambiguity and does not conduct nuclear tests, and the U.S. refrains from pressuring it to sign the NPT.
But in 2009, the problem is more complex. As far as the Americans will progress in talks with Iran, demands will almost certainly arise for a full denuclearization of the region. In other words: “Dimona for Natanz.”
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."