Clearing the Field

I don’t find it odd at all that conservatives hate it when the national party endorses a moderate candidate in a contested Republican primary. The point of elections is for ordinary citizens to decide who they want to lead them. Elections do not work correctly when a national party dictates to its members who will be their nominee. This is always a problem, but it becomes acute in open primaries. At least with incumbents, they are paying dues and have a right to expect some support from the party. This idea that non-incumbents can make it a condition of running that they get the endorsement of their party and that an effort be made to clear the field of strong opponents, is not a good one. In most cases, candidates emerge stronger for the general election after winning a tough primary. It does waste money and it can cause schisms that are slow to heal. But, overall, the challenged candidate fares better than the anointed one. Ask Barack Obama.

Author: BooMan

Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.