I don’t find it odd at all that conservatives hate it when the national party endorses a moderate candidate in a contested Republican primary. The point of elections is for ordinary citizens to decide who they want to lead them. Elections do not work correctly when a national party dictates to its members who will be their nominee. This is always a problem, but it becomes acute in open primaries. At least with incumbents, they are paying dues and have a right to expect some support from the party. This idea that non-incumbents can make it a condition of running that they get the endorsement of their party and that an effort be made to clear the field of strong opponents, is not a good one. In most cases, candidates emerge stronger for the general election after winning a tough primary. It does waste money and it can cause schisms that are slow to heal. But, overall, the challenged candidate fares better than the anointed one. Ask Barack Obama.
About The Author
BooMan
Martin Longman a contributing editor at the Washington Monthly. He is also the founder of Booman Tribune and Progress Pond. He has a degree in philosophy from Western Michigan University.
6 Comments
Recent Posts
- Day 14: Louisiana Senator Approvingly Compares Trump to Stalin
- Day 13: Elon Musk Flexes His Muscles
- Day 12: While Elon Musk Takes Over, We Podcast With Driftglass and Blue Gal
- Day 11: Harm of Fascist Regime’s Foreign Aid Freeze Comes Into View
- Day 10: The Fascist Regime Blames a Plane Crash on Nonwhite People
Hmm, wasn’t that a nickname for Obama among the Larry Johnson crowed? The Anointed One?
kinda ironic.
Tell that to Rahm Emanuel who has interfered with a heavy hand in several Democratic primaries.
As a Pennsylvanian, I’m inclined to tell it to Schumer, Casey, Reid, Menendez, Rendell, and Specter.
I’m sure you’re right. As one who has been through an Emanuel attack on the grass roots (IL-6), I have a special hatred for Emanuel.
I understand.