Peyton Manning is a very, very good quarterback. But he hasn’t come close to proving himself the best quarterback ever. He hasn’t even proved himself to be better than his contemporary, Tom Brady. Brady had an off season after losing the prior season to injury. But, Brady’s resume is much more impressive than Manning’s.
He has played in four Super Bowls, winning three of them (XXXVI, XXXVIII, XXXIX). He has also won two Super Bowl MVP awards (XXXVI and XXXVIII), has been selected to five Pro Bowls (and invited to six, although he declined the 2006 invitation), and holds the NFL record for most touchdown passes in a single regular season. Brady has the sixth-highest career passer rating of all time (93.3) among quarterbacks with at least 1,500 career passing attempts. He was named Sports Illustrated’s Sportsman of the Year in 2005. He also helped set the record for the longest consecutive win streak in NFL history with 21 straight wins over two seasons (2003-04).
Manning has won four Most Valuable Player awards and was the MVP of the one Super Bowl he has been to before today. His stats are incredible. But the test of a quarterback is in the playoffs. The Colts have won at least 12 games every year since 2003, but this is only their second Super Bowl appearance. Two of those years, it was Tom Brady’s Patriots that knocked the Colts out of the playoffs.
In my opinion, Joe Montana is the greatest quarterback to ever play the game, followed by Tom Brady and John Elway. For Manning to move up the list, he must win today, and then win at least one more Super Bowl.
And Drew Brees ain’t chopped liver. That boy can play.
In honor of my great Cajun friend, Geaux Saints!
His father was one of the biggest jerks in football. But the son is different:
Hangs with Stills and Mellancamp and loves Kerouac? Sound countercultural enough for me. Go Colts!
He’ll sign off on the lock out just like the rest of the owners. There is no more despicable group of human beings than NFL owners. There are no exceptions.
When they fart the fumes of hell come out.
nalbar
I’ll support sports unions the second they advocate to slash ticket prices by 80%.
They can all kiss my ass, but I don’t give one crap about NFL players making as much money as they do. Or baseball players.
Press hype, nothing more. So if Indy loses, will that mean that Manning is a second-rater? It still takes eleven players on each side to win a game, and on any Sunday, and so forth and so on, the right team can make any quarterback look great.
Saints will win anyway.
True, but when Trent Dilfer won the Super Bowl with the Baltimore Ravens, no one misunderstand that to mean that he was even a good or adequate quarterback. No one thought Jim McMahon was great just because he quarterbacked for one of the greatest teams of all-time. If a team is great defensively, people recognize why they won. Being the greatest quarterback of all time requires carrying your team repeatedly to the championship, and largely on your own back. Who is in that category? Bradshaw, Staubach, Montana, Elway, and Brady. You can go back and look at Starr and Unitas, too.
Can’t forget Aikman, either, as much as I would like to. But Aikman’s teams were centered on the running game.
They were all great quarterbacks. So how do we decide which one is the greatest? I think the notion of a “great quarterback” is sufficient, in which case all of those mentioned deserve recognition.
If the test of a quarterback is in the playoffs then you’re list is missing the greatest quarterback out of the bayou and his 4 Super Bowl wins (2 Super Bowl MVPs)…
Bradshaw was great, but look at his team. How many of them are in the Hall of Fame?
Do you remember the running backs for the Patriot teams? How about the wide receivers (other than Moss)?
How many members of the Patriots defense are going to be in the Hall of Fame? Maybe two. Compare that to this:
Mel Blount (1970-1983)
Joe Greene (1969-1981)
Jack Ham (1971-1982)
Jack Lambert (1974-1984)
And how many members of Brady’s offense will wind up in the Hall of Fame (other than Moss). Compare that Bradshaw’s offense.
Franco Harris (1972-1983)
John Stallworth (1974-1987)
Lynn Swann (1974-1982)
Mike Webster (1974-1988)
When all your skill players are in the Hall of Fame along with you, and your defense is loaded with Hall of Famers, you don’t have to do as much as a quarterback.
Montana had Rice and Taylor, but he rarely had a great running game (no disrespect to Roger Craig). Elway never had a dominating defense. Brady had to rely on guys like Deion Branch, Antowain Smith, and Troy Brown, not Swann, Stallworth, and Franco Harris. For me, it’s no contest. Brady is greater than Bradshaw.
Brady may or may not be greater than Bradshaw, but I’m just saying that Bradshaw has to be in the conversation.
well, yeah, anyone who wins four championships has to be in the conversation.
And stats mean something, too. I mean, Dan Marino was a great quarterback. Put Marino on those Steeler teams, and they probably win six super bowls. Put Bradshaw on Brady’s Patriots? They probably don’t win any. That’s all I’m saying.
I wouldn’t be so sure about that – the sysem and the coach have a lot to do with that. Bledsoe was doing fairly well when h was injured and Brady stepped in, and Matt Cassel did fairly well when Brady got hurt – neither were too terribly remarkable away from Belicheck. Being coachd by Rasputin has to be factored in as well…
True, Brady does play for the best coach in the game.
I don’t watch football anymore, but when I did Doug Williams was the one I watched. Just for surviving the Bucs, he’s still my hero.
The NFL network did a show yesterday on the ten best performances in a Super Bowl ever. Doug Williams was number one. The Skins scored 35 points in the second quarter after getting down 10-0. They won 42-10. It was the most brilliant quarter of football ever played on the big stage, but it was only a quarter. I wouldn’t have ranked it the best performance in a Super Bowl.
I’m partial to Phil Simm’s performance, but I think Jerry Rice (XXIII) and Montana (XXIV) were probably more dominating. And Steve Young threw 6 TD’s in his Super Bowl. Those would all get my vote before Williams. Still, Williams was a very good QB.
Joe Montana is the greatest QB to ever play the game.
nalbar
Joe Montana is to football as Fred Astaire was to dance. Montana at times made it look effortless.
I like that analogy. Astaire could flat out move.
There will be a better QB than Montana. There will never be another Astaire.
nalbar
I’m rooting for the Saints. But seeing as how Manning’s daddy was the qb for the saints back in the day, I’m sure the announcers will spend most of the game talking about Manning and his daddy. Manning and his roots in NO. Manning and how it must be difficult for his father to root against the saints. Just the idea makes me want to purge
But I’d say in regards to the quote
1. If Brady gets to put a 21-game win streak on the table, surely Manning’s breaking that record at 23 games gets to count.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_longest_winning_streak_in_NFL_history
Me, I vote for Montana too. Everyone’s receiving stats are inflated nowadays by the rules changes.
You all are just too young to remember Johnny Unitas. He and Raymond Berry invented the timing pass to the sidelines. When he was in the game, the Colts (the real Colts, not the ersatz Indiana kind) could be two touchdowns down with two minutes to go and still win.
That was back when quarterbacks were smart enough to call their own plays.
Despite all you mentioned, if I was putting together a team from scratch, I’d pick Manning long before I’d pick Brady.
I suspect you would too.
Manning is crap. Never speak of him as a “great” again.
/Peyton hater.
Two names that I did not see in the preceding comments were:
Dan Marino
Bret Farve
I think that Marino belongs in the conversation with Montana and Elway.
Farve and, maybe, Brady are the best ever.
Sorry Boo, but Elway doesn’t make my top three.
Unitas, Starr, Dawson, Bradshaw, Staubach, Otto Graham are ahead. Even Anderson, Fauts, Marino and Hadl were better though they didn’t win championships. I’d even take Simms over Elway to lead a mediocre team. When Elway was younger and could still run like a deer he was more of a threat but he could cost games too. He should have won championships early in his career too. Young was better too, especially on awful teams.
Elway didn’t suck and did win two SBs late, but don’t minimize the strength of the rest of his later teams.
I’m surprised to see you put Bart Starr over John Elway. Granted, my only experience watching Starr is on old NFL Films shows. But it seems to me that he just had to hand the ball to Jim Taylor and Paul Hornung. Trent Dilfer could have done that.
Its what Starr did in the huddle and on the practice field, in the film room and in the weight room that Dilfer really couldn’t do.
Same for Unitas and Simms
And right on cue, Manning throws the game sealing interception.