What if you were a “hypothetical” corporate news organization and a significant group of the population (i.e., the Tea Party movement) was angry with you about the fact that you had told the truth about their angry attitudes and the often disturbing and racist rhetoric of their members that has been repeatedly and openly on display at their rallies, what would you do? Specifically what would your bosses, ever concerned about losing ad revenues, tell you to do?
Well here’s what CNN did do recently in an attempt to assuage the negative response of Tea Partiers to their previous reporting about the movement.
“When it comes to the Tea Party movement, the stereotypes don’t tell the whole story,” CNN’s Shannon Travis writes. “Here’s what you don’t often see. … Patriotic signs professing a love for country; mothers and fathers with their children; African-Americans proudly participating; and senior citizens bopping to a hip-hop rapper.”
Even more startling than this image of wholesome family outings, however, is Travis’s claim that he has seen no signs of racism at the rallies. “There were a few signs that could be seen as offensive to African-Americans,” he writes. “But by and large, no one I spoke with or I heard from on stage said anything that was approaching racist. Almost everyone I met was welcoming to this African-American television news producer.”
Now, anyone who has seen the footage of participants at tea party rallies, from their first attempts to hijack and disrupt Congressional town hall meetings to their most recent ugly, homophobic and racist verbal attacks on members of Congress in the days leading up to the passing of health care reform know this to be a wildly inaccurate portrayal of the behavior of the people who show up at these tea party gatherings. It’s not like they’ve tried to hide the nasty, crazy and hateful side of their supporters. Far from it.
So why is CNN suddenly trying to portray “Tea Party” supporters as good wholesome Americans? Here’s a possible clue:
Dave Weigel, who is now the Washington Post’s resident expert on the right, adds that CNN’s decision has “befuddled the right and left alike. He suggests that CNN is attempting to assuage the anger of the Tea Parties last year when “CNN’s Susan Roesgen became tea party public enemy No. 1 for a combative segment she filmed at an event in Chicago.”
Too bad CNN is afraid to speak the truth. The Tea Party is filled with bigots, white supremacists, confederate flag supporters, and people who feel bringing guns to a political rally is a good idea. Too bad they can’t simply report what they see, rather than try to sugar coat what is becoming a virulent and dangerous reaction against the first African American President in our history. Too bad they don’t have Keith Olbermann’s guts:
Let me ask the Tea Party leaders (whoever they are) these questions. Before their movement came to prominence and received substantial backing from Fox News, were there large scale disruptions at Congressional town hall meetings? Did people go into the street claiming Obama was a fascist or communist or marxist or Muslim terrorist or someone who was establishing a secret civilian police force or wanted to kill old people or hated white people or was going to send conservatives to concentration camps or [insert stupid wild assed right wing conspiracy theory here]? Were Democratic Congressman and Senators and their families receiving death threats and having their offices and relatives homes vandalized over the votes in support of health care reform?
I don’t think so. CNN’s cowardly attempt to walk away from the truth of the Tea Party’s true appeal is one more sad instance that demonstrates our corporate media in this country is easily intimidated by those in the minority who would shut down all voices and all opinions in this country but their own.
Shame on you CNN. I can’t say I expected better from the network that first hired Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs and now employees serial right wing defamation artist and shotgun census worker shooter Erik Erikson, but for the company that claims its the most “Trusted Name in News” this is only more evidence of the hypocrisy of that boast.
but for the company that claims its the most “Trusted Name in News” this is only more evidence of the hypocrisy of that boast.
I presume you know what they say about people that need to boast in this manner, right?
We need to stop giving people props for doing stuff they should already be doing.
How ELSE should you treat an African-American producer?
Well, if the best press the Tea Party can get says, “Hey, not everyone here is racist” and “Just a few of the signs were racist, the rest were OK”, I’d have to say they’ve lost the media battle.
BTW, Tea Partiers on non-political forums I read strenuously deny any racism occurred during the walk to vote on HIR and say the CBC is lying. All other displays of racism are now moot; Tea Partiers are victims. Seriously.
Steve, check out these slides.
Those were awesome. Thanks.
Gotta be honest with you Steven, I think you are taking an unreasonable position on this one. CNN sucks, agreed, so that’s out of the way.
But when it comes to the “Tea Parties,” it is irrational to suggest that ALL of the tea party protests are full of bigotry and hate. While we have all seen the preponderance of terrible signs and racists at some tea parties, it is irrational to suggest that all the tea party meetings are like that.
It is just as false, in my opinion, for you to suggest that all the tea parties are full of racists, as it would be to assert that there is no racism in tea parties.
The reality, the nuanced reality of the situation, is that the racism, xenophobia, and nonsense that account for much of the tea partying exist alongside a great, large number of non-racist individuals who simply don’t trust the US government, who don’t trust Obama, who don’t trust Washington.
While I am unwavering in my condemnations of bigotry, violence, and the media that feeds it all, it’s not hard to understand why so many people distrust our government. I didn’t trust our government or our president at all during the Bush years; how different am I, really, from reasonable folks on the right who feel that way now?
Sure, I disagree with their positions, but healthy opposition to Obama’s policies is a key part of our political process. I would love to see more constructive ideas coming from that camp, but they are in their infancy and struggling to gain footing amidst all the extremists.
Many of those who distrust Obama can be swayed by RESULTS, and as the results of Obama’s various reforms begin to reach these people their opinions will shift.
What’s most important is that tea partiers who have an honest disagreement with current policies and a commitment to nonviolence and equality distance themselves from the crazies, of which there are plenty. And we on the left need to understand this crucial distinction, so that we don’t push the moderate Republicans/Tea Partiers away from the center and towards the waiting arms of the extremists.
Cue the yelling about how all tea partiers are racists and I’m an idiot…