The sports teams I root for are a reflection of where I grew up and what teams were on my television for me to watch. So, I root for New York teams (excluding the ‘ets’* and Islanders) because I grew up in the New York media market. Of course, I also grew up in the Philadelphia media market and I rooted for Dr. J’s Sixers and the Broad Street Bullies. And, in the 1970’s the Steelers were both great and on television nearly every week in Philly. So, I liked them too and still hope they do well. In any case, I like to root for the hometeam, not pick and choose based on some random set of factors. But, if you make me watch a basketball game between Michigan State and Oklahoma, I will confess to having Tom Coburn and Jim Inhofe in the back of my mind. I’m not likely to start cheering for the Sooners. So, I can kind of understand where David Brooks was coming from when he chose to root for Duke over Butler in the NCAA championship game because the Duke kids are ‘privileged’ and work harder than the schlubs that go to shitty schools like Butler. (I root for Princeton’s basketball team, but for a different reason. I grew up there). For a guy like Brooks, the Duke players and (particularly) the students that cheer for them are his kind of people. It validates his worldview that elites are where they are because they work hard and deserve everything they’ve got. Never mind that you don’t work hard to become a 6’11” human being or to be born into the Johnson & Johnson fortune, Never mind that the kids at Butler are more likely to have already exceeded the educational level of their parents, while the opposite is the case for the kids at Duke. Never mind that a lot of the Duke student-athletes come from extremely modest circumstances, too.
Brooks could have chosen to root for Duke for no other reason than that he was once a visiting professor there, but instead, he tells us:
David Brooks: A few hours after that atrocity of opening day, Duke went on to beat Butler the national championship. You should know that Duke is one of my alma maters. I am very generous in my definition of alma maters. I claim that affiliation with any school I went to, taught at, lived near (Villanova and St. Johns) or parked at.
Unlike 90 percent of America, I was rooting for Duke last night. This was widely cast as a class conflict — the upper crust Dukies against the humble Midwestern farm boys. If this had been a movie, Butler’s last second heave would have gone in instead of clanging off the rim, and the country would still be weeping with joy.
But this is why life is not a movie. The rich are not always spoiled. Their success does not always derive from privilege. The Duke players — to the extent that they are paragons of privilege, which I dispute — won through hard work on defense.
And in case you’re not sure what he’s getting at, he made it clear in the next exchange with Gail Collins:
Gail Collins: I’m sorry, when the difference is one weensy basket, I’d say Duke won neither by privilege nor hard work but by sheer luck. But don’t let me interrupt your thought here. I detect the subtle and skillful transition to a larger non-sport point.
David Brooks: Yes. I was going to say that for the first time in human history, rich people work longer hours than middle class or poor people. How do you construct a rich versus poor narrative when the rich are more industrious?
So, in other words, Brooks was offended that the Butler kids were considered the scrappy hard-working underdogs when it is the Duke kids who have a far more demanding course load and who had to work harder to get into the university in the first place. Not only that, but elites actually put in more weekly hours than regular folks, so who’s more industrious and deserving anyway?
It’s my impression that Duke does have higher academic standards for their college athletes than most schools, although I don’t know that for certain. I’m not trying to denigrate the very accomplished young men on Duke’s championship-winning basketball team. But it is very odd to root for them not because you’re from North Carolina or because you admire their style of play, but because you think they’re elites, just like you. I mean, isn’t that strange?
* The ‘ets’ are the Jets, Mets, and Nets. The Islanders go with them…all teams that originally played on Long Island.
What. An. Asshole.
— Woody Allen
Boo:
How much does legacy play into getting admitted to Duke? And by legacy, I mean not only has relatives that went to the school, but the relatives have given the school $$$$$$$$$$$$$$. Do you really think Dubya would have gotten into Yale if he was Joe the Plumber?
I can’t speak for Boo or for Duke, but these days all the top private schools say it doesn’t matter. Back in W’s day, that’s something else.
I went to Stanford; I’ve heard Deans of Admissions swear there’s no legacy bonus now and I’ve heard alumni friends swear at Deans who proved it.
… for the first time in human history, rich people work longer hours than middle class or poor people.”
WTF? From where does he pull crap like this? Is he calling it “work” when upper management makes deals while golfing or having drinks in exclusive clubs or going off on executive retreats? I mean, there is no doubt in my mind that there are financial fund managers and corporate types whose lives are exclusively devoted to increasing their personal wealth 24/7. They probably dream about profit/loss statements! They are likely to be thinking about acquisitions and mergers while they f*ck their expensive call girls! All those galas and museum fundraisers and parties featured in Vanity Fair are all about business networking, right? High-pressure stuff! None of that is fun or feels like leisure time, right? OMG, acquiring and keeping wealth is soooo much harder than making it from paycheck to paycheck. Let’s all moan in sympathy for the maligned Ruling Class.
Or I’ll be generous: Maybe Brooks is referring to corporate employees who earn more than $75K who have to put in 60-to-80 hour work weeks because the other option is… getting fired! You know, that wonderful boost in productivity that gets pointed out. The boost that was brought about by down-sizing, off-shoring the menial tasks and combining the remaining jobs! “We’re all so sad about having to lay-off Peter. Paul, you don’t mind doing his job, too, do you?” “No sir, of course not, sir. I’m honored and privileged to do twice as much work for the same salary.” Maybe he’s referring to those “rich” people…
my question too- where does he get that info? how does he know rich people work longer hours than poor and middle class? how does he know it’s the first time in history??? wtf? (like your example of corporate types working 2 jobs for fear of being fired!)
He gets it where he gets all of his “sociological data”.
lol! early in the morning for that kind of imagery!
I found this, don’t know if it’s accurate:
My alma mater, Davidson College, regularly competes with Duke both on the court and for recruits. Of course and for obvious reasons, Duke is more attractive for the top tier athletes. But both schools require their athletes to carry a workload. In my work-study job at Davidson, I helped athletes and it seemed that those who struggled with the workload tended to transfer from the school.
Just looked it up and Davidson’s basketball graduation rate is always above 90%. Unlike Duke, it’s the uncommon athlete who goes to Davidson expecting a post-collegiate pro career, but my point is that both schools share a similar academic profile when recruiting basketball athletes. I tip my hat to Duke.
Just to be clear, I tip my hat to Duke’s academic success, not that I agree with Brooks’ point.
Which seems to be that a person can fabricate any basis to prove a preconceived bias. Could I say that Duke should have won because it was well-funded by a tobacco industry scion?
And speaking of graduation rates, I was surprised to find this:
That article continues:
I think that’s a more common POV than what Brooks says. Summing up Brooks, his basic message seems to be this:
And where did Coach K get that from? Maybe his coach when he was a player? You know, some uncouth loud mouth named Robert Montgomery Knight. For all the bad things about him, Knight was a stickler about his players going to class .. and graduating .. hell .. he had higher standards than the NCAA
IU Bloomington (in-state): $8,613
Bultler: $29,246
Duke: $40,243
That is, of course, if you consider schmoozing with customers or suppliers on the golf course, going to retreats at resorts with other executives, and cultivating your network with nightly entertainment–if you consider these “working”.
As for Bobo’s opinion of Duke, Bobo’s an ass and must have gotten a speaking or teaching gig under affirmative action.
I rooted for Duke, mainly because it was the only North Carolina team left. About the only North Carolina school I won’t root for is Campbell. It’s a political decision. None of them at all are my alma maters so there is no great angst about which to support.
Other than both schools are expensive and other than David Brooks is a horses behind and other than the graduation rate for athletes at most schools is far too low, I always thought the Mets played at Shea in Queens.
Yeah, and Queens is on Long Island, even if it isn’t called Long Island.
Wiki