Obama got his (somewhat weak) international sanctions on Iran today. That’s an accomplishment. There’s exactly no chance that a President McCain could have convinced China or Russia to go along with sanctions even if he been inclined to do anything short of Bomb, Bomb. Bomb Iran. Here’s Obama’s statement:
THE PRESIDENT: Good afternoon, everybody. Today, the United Nations Security Council voted overwhelmingly to sanction Iran for its continued failure to live up to its obligations. This resolution will put in place the toughest sanctions ever faced by the Iranian government, and it sends an unmistakable message about the international community’s commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons.
For years, the Iranian government has failed to live up to its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It has violated its commitments to the International Atomic Energy Agency. It has ignored U.N. Security Council resolutions. And while Iran’s leaders hide behind outlandish rhetoric, their actions have been deeply troubling. Indeed, when I took office just over 16 months ago, Iranian intransigence was well-established. Iran had gone from zero centrifuges spinning to several thousand, and the international community was divided about how to move forward.
Yet this day was not inevitable. We made clear from the beginning of my administration that the United States was prepared to pursue diplomatic solutions to address the concerns over Iranian nuclear programs. I extended the offer of engagement on the basis of mutual interest and mutual respect. And together with the United Kingdom, with Russia, China, and Germany, we sat down with our Iranian counterparts. We offered the opportunity of a better relationship between Iran and the international community –- one that reduced Iran’s political isolation, and increased its economic integration with the rest of the world. In short, we offered the Iranian government the prospect of a better future for its people, if -– and only if –- it lives up to its international obligations.
So there is no double standard at play here. We’ve made it clear, time and again, that we respect Iran’s right, like all countries, to access peaceful nuclear energy. That is a right embedded in the NPT -– a treaty that has to serve as the safeguard against a world in which more nations acquire the world’s most deadly weapons, and international law is treated as an empty promise. That NPT treaty was signed by all the parties involved, and it is a treaty that the United States has sought to strengthen from the day I took office, including through our own commitments to reduce America’s nuclear arsenal.
So let me repeat: We recognize Iran’s rights. But with those rights come responsibilities. And time and again, the Iranian government has failed to meet those responsibilities. Iran concealed a nuclear enrichment facility in Qom that raised serious questions about the nature of its program. Iran further violated its own obligations under U.N. Security Council resolutions to suspend uranium enrichment. Instead, they’re enriching up to 20 percent. It has failed to comply fully with IAEA’s requirements. Indeed, Iran is the only NPT signatory in the world — the only one — that cannot convince the IAEA that its nuclear program is intended for peaceful purposes.
That’s why the international community was compelled to impose these serious consequences. These are the most comprehensive sanctions that the Iranian government has faced. They will impose restrictions on Iran’s nuclear activities, its ballistic missile program, and, for the first time, its conventional military. They will put a new framework in place to stop Iranian smuggling, and crack down on Iranian banks and financial transactions. They target individuals, entities, and institutions -– including those associated with the Revolutionary Guard –- that have supported Iran’s nuclear program and prospered from illicit activities at the expense of the Iranian people. And we will ensure that these sanctions are vigorously enforced, just as we continue to refine and enforce our own sanctions on Iran alongside our friends and our allies.
The strong resolution that was passed today benefited from strong international support. In voting for it, we were joined by nations from Asia, Africa, Europe, and Latin America -– including Russia and China. And these sanctions show the united view of the international community that a nuclear arms race in the Middle East is in nobody’s interest, and that nations must be held accountable for challenging the global non-proliferation regime. The Iranian government must understand that true security will not come through the pursuit of nuclear weapons. True security will come through adherence to international law and the demonstration of its peaceful intent.
We know that the Iranian government will not change its behavior overnight, but today’s vote demonstrates the growing costs that will come with Iranian intransigence. And I want to be clear: These sanctions do not close the door on diplomacy. Iran continues to have the opportunity to take a different and better path. I would like nothing more than to reach the day when the Iranian government fulfills its international obligations -– a day when these sanctions are lifted, previous sanctions are lifted, and the Iranian people can finally fulfill the greatness of the Iranian nation.
Indeed, these sanctions are not directed at the Iranian people. As I said in Cairo, for decades the Iranian government has defined itself in opposition to my country. But faced with the opportunity to find a new way forward –- one that would benefit its own people — the Iranian government has chosen instead to remain a prisoner of the past.
Saturday will mark one year from the day that an election captivated the attention of the world -– an event that should have been remembered for how the Iranian people participated with remarkable enthusiasm, but will instead be remembered for how the Iranian government brutally suppressed dissent and murdered the innocent, including a young woman left to die in the street.
Actions do have consequences, and today the Iranian government will face some of those consequences. Because whether it is threatening the nuclear non-proliferation regime, or the human rights of its own citizens, or the stability of its own neighbors by supporting terrorism, the Iranian government continues to demonstrate that its own unjust actions are a threat to justice everywhere.
I want and hope for the people of Iran that the government of Iran will make a different choice. It can make a different choice and pursue a course that will reaffirm the NPT as the basis of global non-proliferation and disarmament -– a course that will advance Iran’s own security and prosperity, and the peace of the wider world. Today’s sanctions are yet another signal that if the Iranian government continues to undermine the NPT and the peace that it protects, then Iran will find itself more isolated, less prosperous and less secure.
Thank you.
Brazil and Turkey voted against sanctions and Lebanon abstained. The important thing is that Obama has made the United Nations a piece of U.S. problem solving again, instead of nothing more than a nuisance and obstacle to our plans. And he’s reinvigorated the non-proliferation effort and started to address some of the internal contradictions and hypocrisies that have hampered enforcement and compliance in recent years.
Obviously, he’s regained credibility for our country, and that gives us the opportunity to take actions short of warto protect our interests and security.
“Obama has made the United Nations a piece of U.S. problem solving again…“
Except that it isn’t even clear there is an actual problem here, and if there were, sanctions would not be the way to solve it.
Horsepucky. As President Ahmadinejad has said, these sanctions (like the previous three rounds) don’t amount to anything. The whole thing is a charade.
The US has spent months now getting two major allies to sign on to this travesty. Why did they finally agree? Because the thing has been so watered down so as to be meaningless.
The new sanctions add 41 companies and one individual to the blacklist. That means that Iran (and China?) will have to set up 412 new companies to do what the old ones did — how long will that take? Consider it done.
China (just behind Japan) is the second largest recipient if Iran’s petroleum exports, and India is next. Both of these latter countries are expanding thweir economies and need more oil. China’s GDP growyh is 10% and India’s is 8.5%. (The US is -2.4%) Is China going to do anything to jeopardize their oil supply? Sure, when they run out of egg-rolls.
The biggest kicker is that the United Nations doesn’t have any authority to enforce anything — these sanctions all require action at the national level which won’t happen in most of the world for the reasons stated above. China and India have set up new companies to get around previous sanctions and they’ll do it again if they have to (but Iran should be able to handle them).
Sure they did. Obama stiffed Turkey and Brazil, rebuffing an agreement he had previously encouraged them to pursue. The previous IAEA chief, Dr. ElBaradei, couldn’t believe it. In an interview on June 3 in Jornal do Brasil, a major newspaper in Brazil, ElBaradei expressed his profound disappointment and surprise at the American reaction. He explained that the proposal signed in Iran was the same as his proposal, which was accepted by the West in the past.
No way, Jose. This is BAD for US credibility, highlighting that Obama is a liar and a tool of Israel. Iran’s civil nuclear program is supported by the majority of nations in the world, including: The 125 Non-Aligned Movement, which periodically voices its support; all Iran’s neighbors (except Israel); all Iran’s major trading partners in Asia — Japan, China, India, Malaysia; countries in the western hemisphere like Venezuela, Brazil and Mexico.
The only countries that are really against Iran on this matter are Israel, its US hand-maiden, and US allies Canada, UK, France and Germany. That’s six countries out of a couple hundred. The three-percenters.
Thanks Don, for filling in the details.
Personally I believe the policy of sanctioning Iran is both misguided and pointless. But if we’re going to follow a misguided policy, it’s better to pursue it competently rather than incompetently. I suppose that’s the way I feel about our involvement in Afghanistan by this point as well.
If the policy is “misguided” it doesn’t matter whether how it is pursued. Wrong is wrong no matter how you do it.
Future historians will not look kindly on the U.S. and EU’s rejection of the LEU deal with Turkey, which had been originally proposed by Obama. It was the U.S. who clenched their fist and pulled back after Iran finally took them up on their offer. It also demonstrates that the U.S. was never really serious about diplomacy and negotiations with Iran in the first place.
The only thing the sanctions will accomplish will be to bring us one step closer to war. Look for Iran to close the door to further talks and the Israelis finally running out of patience. Then watch the bombs drop on Tehran and Tel Aviv, with the U.S. being dragged into the conflict in order to defend Israel.
Wasn’t going to war supposed to be a tactic of last resort? I guess being given a peace prize does not necessarily make you a man of peace.
“It also demonstrates that the U.S. was never really serious about diplomacy and negotiations with Iran in the first place.“
More importantly it strongly supports the position that the furor over Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program (or intentions, or capability-in-case-it’s-ever-needed intentions, or whatever) is yet another manufactured crisis a la the Iraqi WMD/Al Qa`eda connection lies. It has always had a strong smell of that anyway.
“There’s exactly no chance that a President McCain could have convinced China or Russia to go along with sanctions.”
Why not? Bush did 3 times.
“The important thing is that Obama has made the United Nations a piece of U.S. problem solving again, instead of nothing more than a nuisance and obstacle to our plans.”
If you’re saying that a UNSC resolution is better than an actual war, then I suppose it is. If you are saying that Obama is shrewdly advancing US interests and is pursuing “non-proliferation” then I beg to differ. I don’t know if you noticed but he seems to be pursuing the exact same policies against Iran that Bush did. Iran must halt all uranium enrichment or face sanctions.
That he has not gone to war is not a sign that Obama is a man of peace. It is a function of Iran’s ability to retaliate. Precisely the same reason Bush didn’t attack.
Why sanctions against Iran? (I mean, other than kissing Israel’s patooty.)
Obama:
Iran is being ordered to prove it doesn’t have a nuclear weapons program.
Sound familiar?
Remember ordering Saddam Hussein to prove that he didn’t have WMDs?
Why are there are Safeguards Agreements with NPT signatory countries? And the IAEA to enforce them?
NPT:
“exclusive purpose . . .preventing diversion of nuclear energy”
Under Dr. ElBaradei the IAEA consistently reported:
Under the new, politicized IAEA, with the new Director General, Yukiya Amano, the report is:
and:
This is where Obama gets his reason for sanctions.
But, again, the only treaty requirement Iran has is to not divert nuclear energy from peaceful uses to nuclear weapons, which it doesn’t.
It has no treaty requirement to prove that “all nuclear material in Iran is in peaceful activities”, and IN ANY CASE THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PROVE, just like it was for Saddam Hussein.
So what goes around comes around.
It always astounds me how US progressives have swallowed the neo-con world-view lock stock and barrel. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is an idiot who stole the last Iranian elections and is becoming an increasingly repressive dictator within Iran, but Iran hardly has the monopoly of idiots, repression or stolen elections. This is another example of the US acting as a client state of Israel – the only nuclear superpower and colonial regime in the region. Obama seems to have forgotten that Israel has violated more Security Council resolutions than any state in history – and hasn’t even bothered to sign the non-proliferation Treaty which is now being used to victimise Iran.
Obama as stupid as Bush? No. But US progressives who think this represents some kind of progressive policy seem to be. These sanctions will do nothing more than consolidate Ahmadinejad’s illegitimate hold on power, further isolate the more progressive elements in Iranian society, and increase the likelihood of a war involving the US, Israel, and Iran.
China, Japan, India et al will stand back amazed as the US wastes more men and material on another war it can’t win. “When will they ever learn?”.
Frank: Some early mistakes, then it gets better.
“Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is an idiot”
For an idiot, he’s done rather well in life.
“who stole the last Iranian elections”
Since when is stealing elections unusual?
“is becoming an increasingly repressive dictator”
Actually, he is not even the head of state — that’s Supreme Leader Ali Hoseini-Khamenei. Ahmadinejad is the head of government.
Frank, I am afraid it does sound as if you have drunk the Kool Aid when it comes to Ahmadinajad.
Comparing anyone to Bush is rather extreme.
ooops — I did when I likened Obama to Bush on faking WMD threats.
But he asked for it.
Obama: “The American people weren’t just failed by a President – they were failed by much of Washington. By a media that too often reported spin instead of facts. . .I will always tell the American people the truth.” — Oct 2, 2008
The Israelis haven’t signed the treaty and what are you doing about it, Mr. President?