Anyone remember the opening to Martin Luther King Jr.’s I Have a Dream speech?
“Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of captivity.
But one hundred years later, we must face the tragic fact that the Negro is still not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. So we have come here today to dramatize an appalling condition.”
When that speech was delivered forty-seven years ago tomorrow, Barack Obama Jr. had just turned two years-old and was living in a state that was just barely four years-old. His parents’ interracial marriage was still intact, but it was not recognized and would have been illegal in much of the country.
On the anniversary of the speech, a guy who said the following will be holding a rally at the Lincoln Memorial:
“This president I think has exposed himself over and over again as a guy who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture….I’m not saying he doesn’t like white people, I’m saying he has a problem. This guy is, I believe, a racist.” – Glenn Beck, July 28, 2009
The theme of the rally is ‘restoring honor,’ which can only be interpreted as a call to get the half-black man out of the White House.
I ignore Glenn Beck as a matter of principle. It’s easy to simply not watch his show and not read articles about the idiotic things he says. But it’s not easy to ignore the offensive nature of this rally. Jim Crow technically ended forty-five years ago, and no one wants to harp on the injustices of the past. But we have a right to use the anniversary of the I Have a Dream speech to look back and remember the way things were and what it took to change them.
Instead, we are treated to a Glenn Beck rally at the site of the great speech that will be headlined by Sarah Palin. Sarah Palin recently defended a radio shock jock’s repeated use of the word ‘nigger’ by saying she shouldn’t apologize but ‘reload.’
Compare this nonsense to the history it seeks to besmirch:
“But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.
We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force. The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny and their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone.”
There isn’t enough shame in the world for Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin.
good article, BooMan
I still can’t believe Beck has the audacity to go there. Sarah Palin has the nerve to talk about being “offensive,” does she not realize how offensive THIS is? Keep solidifying the black vote to the Democrats, guys, you’re only pushing all of the other Others there, too.
Is that an honest “I can’t believe” or a rhetorical “I can’t believe”?
Because I can TOTALLY believe that Glenn Beck has the audacity to go there. The man is a huckster of the highest order – he feeds on audacity. He’s not like Limbaugh, who is motivated by power and money. Beck wants, more than anything else, attention. He doesn’t even seem to care what kind of attention he gets. Just so long as people are paying attention to him.
So he pulls this audacious stunt. The thing with Beck is that the next one will be worse. Guaranteed.
Rhetorical, of course.
You do realize that the few remaining African-American voters in the Republican Party are acolytes of Thomas Sowell, Michael Steele, J.C. Watts, or Clarence Thomas. Or they are opportunists who front for white-owned corporations that want to play the race card.
Or they are sincere, moral conservative Christians on cultural issues.
The effect of pushing these folks into the Democratic Party is to move Democrats to the right.
The same is true for Cuban-Americans who might be fed up with immigrant bashing, lots of muslim Americans who have been entrepreneurial since they arrived in the US, and conservative Catholic Hispanics attracted to the GOP only for its stance against abortion.
Yeah, I realize that, and that will be the end of the Republican party–in which case I hope the Dems split as it’s really more like a coalition rather than a political party.
It’s kind of how the Liberal Democrats of Britain are really two parties, thus you have some cognitive dissonance in some of their actions.
Political parties in a non-parliamentary legislature tend to be coalitions. That is what the GOP has forgotten.
In parliamentary legislatures, forming a government is a matter of creating coalitions between political parties.
The US is not conducive to ideologically pure parties unless the voters can be brow-beaten into being ideologically pure.
Yes, but the offensiveness is instructive, isn’t it?
as spokespersons for the people/corporations who pay them so well, Blech, Palin and the rest of the hacks are projecting/reinforcing the dominant meme, i.e. the poor and middle class need to shut up and take it. just consider yourself fortunate you live in the “great” United States.
Our president, in context.
link
A lot of racial change in the 60s, particularly in the years 1963-4 and 1967-8. The white majority went along with some of it, some felt things were happening too quickly no doubt, while always there was that small pocket of reactionary resistance.
In 1968, the year after the unanimous Loving decision, I recall a somewhat big brouhaha involving a network tv variety special where during the taping a popular white British singer, Petula Clark, walked over to black singer Harry Belafonte (a major backer of the 1963 MOW and CR movement generally) and just put her hand gently on his arm, nothing more. This set off the rep for the show’s sponsor, Chrysler, who objected that such unconventional “race-mixing” would not go over well in the South and that the sponsor would not back such a controversial program.
I believe the show’s director paid a visit to Chrysler headquarters in Detroit to complain and get the higher ups to back down. Meanwhile he’d also quietly and cleverly arranged, with the shows’ two stars, only to have that one take with Clark touching Belafonte videotaped then sent to network execs in NY for final Standards & Practices (i.e., network censor) show approval. Petula Clark, the show’s main star and producer, then said that the show would be shown as is or there would be no show. The network, NBC, decided to go along. The Chrysler rep who’d objected was not long thereafter fired, iirc.
Seems like a small victory perhaps, but it represented another major barrier broken in the national culture. And we saw some liberal-minded people acting boldly, not willing to compromise for the sake of racial “sensitivity”, standing their ground, and winning in the end.
Wow, 96 percent of white Americans in 1958 were against interracial marriage? I’m sure the number was very high, but that’s a little bit hard to believe. I wonder what sorts of people they polled back then.
Restoring Honor with Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin
It’s not an elephant rally, it’s an oxymoron rally.
And, BooMan, “shame” is not in their vocabulary except as a five-letter epithet to hurl at other people.
you know what?
I hope the crazy motherfuckers go nuts this weekend. i really do. I hope there’s a riot in DC, or one of them shoots someone or something. I hope they wind up discrediting themselves so badly there’s no coming back.
Jesus fucking christ, will this asshole’s Lonesome Rhodes moment NEVER come?
Now that is a nonsectarian sentiment worthy of a place in every schoolroom in our nation.
It’s an especially nice touch that the Beck rally is sponsored by the National Rifle Association.
Yup. That enables them to reload.
But then, who do you shoot first? King, or Lincoln?
You’re right, Booman, we have a right to look back at how things were. And NOT selective rememberance and revisionist history that makes white liberals feel morally superior to white conservatives. McDonald’s may have acquitted this nation of its betrayal, but some of us still remember the truth. When I read those words of a man who saved the soul of this nation, I can’t help but remember the man who generously and selflessly handed LBJ the mantle of “greatness” was put on the white house’s black list–FORMALLY DISINVITED. I remember that reliably liberal newspaper and magazine columnists and editorialists at WaPo, the Times and Time Magazine called him a traitor his country. Afterall, who would have thought that a Christian preacher and architect of the American non-violent civil rights movement would offend the sensibilities of Americans by speaking out against a war, a Democratic president’s war? I remember that in the span of a year Dr. King’s favorable ratings plummeted from 75% to 30% or lower at the time of his death. And now all I think about is how history is repeating itself.
“Mr. Beck is an ignorant, divisive, pathetic figure”.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/28/opinion/28herbert.html?_r=1
Big fan of Herbert, but he doesn’t go far enough here. Blech is ignorant, etc., and so are the millions, by association, who follow and extol him.
I think many progressives are in denial regarding just how ignorant and bigoted many Americans are.
Bigoted, yes; evil, yes, ignorant, no.
These people are many things, almost all of them despicable, but they’re not ignorant. Stupid, immoral, sociopathic, deranged, you name it… but they know damn good and well what they’re about, what they’re saying and doing, and what they want to bring out and make happen.
They know what they want.
None of this came out until Blech and Lobotomy took point on the issues…. but it’s not like any of these folks don’t know what they’re doing or are simply misguided but well-intentioned.
They know most Americans won’t accept them if they tell the truth about what they’re doing.
Calling the Beckistanis “ignorant” is like calling the banksters “unlucky” and the Shrubbian Economic Disaster “an unforeseeable event.” It’s a gorram LIE. They’re trying, carefully and deliberately, to rebuild the world into the way they want it to be.
They are not ignorant. They know.
I disagree.
the teabaggers and other whiners are ignorant because the refuse to learn/realize who is actually at fault for their complaint.
refusing to understand causality is ignorance.
The baggers are not refusing to learn or realize who’s at fault, nor are they unaware of the causal links. They know quite well. They are simply refusing to admit that they caused the disaster, and are working to reinstate their destructive system, while denying the obvious and refusing to admit to error. Essentially they’re two-year-olds caught with their hands in the jar – except that unlike two-year-olds they have no possible claim to innocence or misunderstanding.
They’re not ignorant; they’re dishonest.