WikiLeaks: The Palestinian Papers

9 Comments

1. 

   PeakVT on January 24, 2011 at 12:11 pm

   I’ve only glanced at the documents themselves, but the coverage so far is interesting to watch.  It looks like this is going to cause a huge shitstorm globally.  In the US, though, I think this will go uncovered or under-covered, due to biases we all know about.  (The GNews aggregator is dominated by foreign sources right now, though to be fair, most have had a head start on US sources.)

   I’m still convinced that the two-state solution is dead, but the contents of these documents could revive that plan if it causes the rest of the world to unite actively and put pressure on the US.  The world has largely been on the side of the Palestinians for a while, but it’s never been much of a priority for any country (occasional rabble-rousing for domestic purposes not withstanding).

   • 

     Mattes on January 24, 2011 at 4:27 pm

     I’m sure Israel takes prime land.

     • 

       Hurria on January 26, 2011 at 7:55 pm

       As you know, Israel has always taken the prime land.

       • 

         shergald on January 26, 2011 at 10:49 pm

         And the water resources.

         • 

           Hurria on January 27, 2011 at 4:22 am

           Oh, yes, of course! Thanks for reminding me of that very significant fact.

2. 

   PeakVT on January 24, 2011 at 12:23 pm

   The map is predictably awful, aside from allowing Israel to keep most of the land it has illegally appropriated.  The Palestinian portion of the central highlands is effectively divided in two by the annexations around Jerusalem, Ramallah and Bethlehem are partially encircled and thus denied significant portions of their natural hinterlands, and the area west of Nablus is carved up so much that economic activity for the Palestinians in that region will be crippled forever.  All those burdens are ones Israel is quite happy to put onto any future state in the West Bank.  And none of them would show up in a strictly numerical presenation (swapping X acres here, Y percentage here, etc.), which is what a casual observer is likely to read in the media.

3. 

   shergald on January 25, 2011 at 10:27 am

   What will the US do on the UN Resolution before the Security Council to stop Israeli settlements? Is there any doubt? This piece from the Council from the National Interest tells us.

   “Palestine Papers” Expose U.S. As Dishonest Peace Broker

   Any remaining illusion that the United States has ever been an honest broker in Israel-Palestine peace talks vanished yesterday. The Arab news outlet Al-Jazeera released a nearly 1700 document dump on the negotiations for a two state solution with a promise of more to come over the next few days. It’s disappointing, but too often the case, that the U.S. mainstream media has not extensively covered the story. But the explosive facts are now out there, visible for everyone to see. The papers include background memos and reports of meetings and negotiating positions focused on the time period 2008-9. Britain’s Guardian newspaper describes the documents as a chronicle of “the slow death of the Middle East peace process.”

   The Palestinian negotiators, it is now clear, offered far more both at Annapolis and at Taba Egypt peace talks than anyone not directly involved in the process believed at that time. They were willing to cede control over most of East Jerusalem as well as nearly all the ground on the West Bank on which the major Israeli settlements contiguous to Jerusalem were located. The major Muslim holy site the al-Aqsa mosque, Harm al’Sharif, would have been subject to what chief PLO negotiator Saeb Erekat described as a “creative” solution, possibly being placed under control of a special commission. Erekat described the concessions as creating the “largest Jerusalem in history” under Jewish control.

   The Palestinian diaspora would have no right of return to their former homes in Israel and Israel even floated the idea of expelling its Arab citizens and resettling them on the West Bank. It was virtually a complete capitulation, the result of a powerless illegitimate entity that does not reflect the will of its people having to deal with a very powerful opponent totally supported by the world’s superpower. The Israeli negotiator Tzipi Livni declared that the Palestinian concessions were not enough as the Palestinians had balked at conceding one major settlement Har Homa that blocked their access to their rump portion of Jerusalem from the West Bank. Livni wanted 100% and was supported in her obduracy by President George W. Bush and his staff.

   The Palestinian people have rightly been shocked by the concessions being considered in their name, but it is a sign of the desperation of their negotiators striving for a settlement at nearly any price as they watch continuing acquisitions of land and settlement building on the West Bank by the Israeli government.

   If the Palestinian people believe they have been betrayed by their leadership that is something they will have to deal with themselves. But the American people have also been betrayed by a phony process that has dragged on for years at great cost to the taxpayer while inflicting terrible damage on the international standing of the United States. Israel continues to receive $7 million a day directly from the U.S. Treasury plus much more in earmarks and tax deductible donations used to fund illegal settlements. Throw in the billions that have gone to Egypt and Jordan to keep the peace with Israel and the total costs to the United States have been staggering.

   The Council for the National Interest believes that the unconscionable posturing and blank check granted to successive Israeli regimes by both Democratic and Republican U.S. Administrations acting under pressure from the Israel lobby has effectively destroyed any conceivable peace process. The United States has an interest in encouraging a just settlement for the Palestinians and Israelis but it has instead frittered away its opportunity to serve as an arbiter of the situation by consistently throwing vast sums or money at the problem while simultaneously embracing Israeli “security” positions. Security is genuinely an issue, but it is the security of the American people, who are targeted by terrorists as a result of Washington’s embrace of Tel Aviv. American soldiers overseas are likewise the targets of militant groups who use the repression of the Palestinians as a recruiting tool and morale booster. Enough is enough. Israel is not part of the United States and the damage deriving from the relationship should be suggesting to everyone in congress and in the media that it is time for a change of course.

   We are witnessing the collapse of the misguided American project in the Middle East and the specter of irreparable harm to U.S. security and international standing. The Council for the National Interest is calling for a new and rational direction. U.S. interests must come first and they demand a settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian question that is rooted first and foremost in International law and consistent with American professed respect for human rights. Anything less would be another of a series of profound errors by successive U.S. administrations.

4. 

   observer393 on January 26, 2011 at 6:14 am

   So now its official that Abbas and his little team are not only puppets, but traitors to their own people. Shouldnt also forget that Hamas won the parliamentary election too, which few remember.

   Anyway no surprise in Abbas being a traitor.

   That old rocky Egyptian dictatorship fresh form putting its own people down isnt looking too good on this one either.

   US middle eastern diplomacy is being wrecked what with this and a democratic change in Lebanon. That it is being wrecked is a very good thing because it has never done any good to the people of any country there bar arguably one very small one.

5. 

   observer393 on January 27, 2011 at 11:59 pm

   Be interesting to see if the US backed, armed and trained repressive dictatorship in Egypt falls. Democracy in Egypt and other arab states would be interesting and change the whole balance in the region. Of course the last thing the US and Israel want is democracy in arab country as any state in that region that is democracy will be hard on Israel and not friendly with the US. If the people are allowed to vote that is obvious, so lets watch the continued support of fsacist regimes that serve the interests of the US and Israel but hate their own people.