The loss of life is terrible, and the loss of stability is unsettling, and there are no assurances that the Arab World is headed for a better place, but there is a pretty good possibility that we will see a decrease in the threat of terrorism if people there begin to focus more on internal politics than on geopolitical concerns. So, from a completely selfish point of view, I am cautiously happy that there is turmoil and tumult taking place in an arc from Algeria to Yemen to Bahrain. Please let them focus on their own societies and not on how to bring down civilian aircraft. And, please let us be supportive of their efforts at self-governance without undue interference.
I really do believe that both terrorism as a strategy and political Islam as an ideology are born out of a degree of impotency. They are the tools of poor, powerless men. Democratic societies can develop their own lethal pathologies, of course, and our society has its problems. But no one has devised a better system than representative democracy and I doubt a better system is out there to be discovered. Certainly monarchies and dictatorships are inferior systems, provided that a democratic society can provide some tolerable level of law and order.
I’d like to whittle down the repressive regimes we call allies down to Saudi Arabia. And then I hope something transformative happens there that doesn’t cause a global economic or political nightmare. Because Saudi Arabia is the home of Mecca and Medina, it’s a place unlike any other. I’d like to think over time a bunch of democratic countries in the Middle East will produce people who get sick of visiting a wacko police state to fulfill their religious obligations and they will come up with some solution to the ridiculous House of Saud. What it might look like, I can’t say. But it won’t be anything like the travesty that exists there today.
Is Gaddafi dead yet?
“a decrease in the threat of terrorism”
You honestly specified ‘lame’. There’s something uniquely poignant about a grown man making observations that are daft : especially when it’s clear he should know better.
2003 National Intelligence Estimate
16 American Intelligence Agencies unanimously tell GWB invading Iraq will raise the threat of terrorism.
It doesn’t get any more blunt than that.
well, yes, invading Iraq did raise the threat of terrorism. But the revolutions we’re witnessing have the potential to lesson that threat. I hope you can understand that these two things are distinct, even if you don’t agree with my optimism.
‘Potential to reduce the threat.’
Reports are mixed. The Arabian tyrants who were installed with U.S. connivance are convinced Color Revolutions of the Twitter/Facebook variety are in play to send them the way of much maligned Saddam…another U.S. puppet.
Given the straightforward PNAC declaration that ‘Islamic’ states were to ‘have their governments beheaded’ you can understand they are not much for cheerleading Black Ops against them. Their take, anyway, and they are ‘on the ground’ after all.
Have you seen this yet ? It doesn’t backstop my ideas, but I thought it rather well presented.
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/egypt/110220/inside-the-muslim-brotherhood?page=full
http://www.xyonline.net/content/gender-class-and-terrorism
I have the view of Michael Kimmel
The Saudi terrorists of 9/11 Odd. I hadn’t thought Mossad to employ such.
That’s not even a jest.
Kindly tell me how the ‘hijackers’ were identified : a singular piece of detective work considering they were announced within hours of the disasters.
Not sure what you’re getting at. Are you blaming Israel’s intelligence agency for “planting” false names of who actually flew the planes? Or are you accusing Israel of being behind the attack?
I honestly can’t tell based on the way you’ve worded your paragraphs.
Maybe we’d finally see a real decrease in terrorism if we didn’t have to put up with freedom-loving terrorists like thiS:
‘On January 27, Raymond Davis, a former U.S. Special Forces soldier, shot and killed two Pakistani citizens in that nation’s second-largest city, Lahore, using a semi-automatic Glock pistol.’ Glenn Greenwald, Salon.
We now know he worked for our favorite CIA. So-called terrorism is a two street with most of the traffic coming from DC. By the way, you just have to love the US veto of the draft resolution against Israeli imperialism/colonies. After some 50-60 years the US is more than complicit, to say the least.
Your thoughts aren’t half as lame as those of Susan Rice (that is, Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton,et al.).
From a quote in a previous post of years: S Ambassador Susan E. Rice said that the US vetoed a UN resolution which condemned settlements and called for a freeze on construction should not be “seen as an endorsement of Israel’s settlement policies, which the Obama administration has repeatedly denounced.”
Great, we don’t condemn it and we don’t endorse it. So what do we do, tacitly tolerate it which has the same practical result as supporting it. There is no way around this weasel language. Israeli imperial colonialism has become an integral part of US foreign policy for decades. There is no intention of changing tact. Israel and their US proxies hold the US hostage—to ransom. Just the fact that Israeli’s have universal health care while the people of the US do not is insulting enough, not to mention the US and Israeli treatment of the Palestinian. You see, people of the US, the cash the US gives to Israel might go largely to defense, while it also frees up funds of the Israeli government to cover their health care program. I’m not against their program, I’m against being gamed by Israel’s US proxies who make all this injustice happen.
The UN resolution uses the word illegal. The US doesn’t agree with the term. The US is consistant on the settlement issue.
Could happen…but only if there is a real, 1970s-like gas shortage crisis, which is quite possible given what is happening in the Middle East.
We shall see.
Soon.
AG