.
Speech by Nathan Brown, DFA Board Member, on Nov. 15, 2011
Hello Everyone! It’s beautiful to see so many of you here today. On four day’s notice, this is an incredible turnout. Let’s remember how much we can do in so little time.
I’m an English professor, and as some of you know, English professors spend a lot of our time talking about how to construct a “thesis” and how to defend it through argument. So today I’m going to model this way of thinking and writing by using it to discuss the university struggle. My remarks will consist of five theses, and I will defend these by presenting arguments to support them.
THESES
- Tuition increases are the problem, not the solution.
- Police brutality is an administrative tool to enforce tuition increases.
- What we are struggling against is not the California legislature, but the upper administration of the UC system.
- The university is the real world.
- We are winning. [Read more …]
BIRTH OF THE OCCUPATION MOVEMENT
The UC student movement has had a global impact. The tactic of occupation that was crucial to the movement in the fall of 2009, which spread from campus to campus that November, has now also spread across the country. The occupation of university buildings is a time-honored tactic in student struggles. But by many it was also viewed as a “divisive” or “vanguardist” tactic two years ago. Now, thanks largely to the example of the Egyptian revolution, the occupation of public space has become the primary tactic in a national protest movement supported by some 60% of the American people. The mass adoption of this tactic, the manner in which it has grown beyond the university struggle, is a huge victory for our movement.
Here is a passage from an influential student pamphlet written in 2009, Communiqué from an Absent Future: On the Terminus of Student Life, which was read by people across the US and translated into six different languages:
Occupation will be a critical tactic in our struggle…and we intend to use this tactic until it becomes generalized. In 2001 the Argentine piqueteros suggested the form the people’s struggle there should take: road blockades which brought to a halt the circulation of goods from place to place. Within months this tactic spread across the country without any formal coordination between groups. In the same way repetition can establish occupation as an instinctive and immediate method of revolt taken up both inside and outside the university.
People at Adbusters, the Vancouver magazine which initially organized the Occupy Wall Street protests, read that student pamphlet and wrote about it in 2009. The tactic that pamphlet called for was put into practice across the UC system, under the slogan “Occupy Everything,” and the goal of spreading that tactic has been unequivocally achieved. Its achievement has had huge political implications for the whole country. So this is also a way in which we are winning.
Occupation has been and continues to be such an important tactic because it is not limited to the university, but linked to occupations of squares and plazas in cities, and linked to struggles to begin occupying foreclosed properties on a mass scale. The resonance of university occupations with the national occupation movement means that our struggle is growing and expanding. That means we are winning. And the fact that the university struggle can no longer plausibly be considered in isolation from anti-capitalist struggle broadly conceived is itself a huge victory.
We cannot simply change “the university” while leaving “the world” as it is, because the university is the real world. By changing the university, we change the world. And we have to change the world in order to change the university.
.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
I’ve been reading some historical New Left writings and manifestos (actually I should say re-reading things I read back when I was a much younger man), and I can’t help but notice the parallels between much of what I’ve read by this era’s Occupiers and what was being written in 1967 and 1968 in Germany, France, and the US. I wish I had a bit more time on my hands to figure it out, but I do wonder if today’s folks are or have been reading some of this earlier material.
Sounds quite familiar to me too. I seem to remember that back in the day, many had looked into the history of past social movements. One thing that comes to mind almost unbidden, is Joan Baez’ “Joe Hill”. The music of that time was always very powerful to me, at least.
A bit of updated music for an old theme playing out on the streets once again.
Joe Hill, so powerful and moving
is they are headed right where the SDS wound up: at a convention that split with half the room shooting Mao slogans and the other half yelling VC slogans.
Read the book the 60’s by Todd Gitlin.
2011 does resemble 1968 imo. btw, interested in y’all’s opinion – Bloomberg’s weird arrest of the “lone” “terrorist” seems he’s found a shiny object, taking a page from the Bushco playbook, trying to distract attention from the mayors’ crackdowns on occupiers.
.
"But I will not let myself be reduced to silence."
are making the movement less popular.
From Public Policy Polling:
I think this analysis is right:
And in California the pollster found “California voters like the Occupy Wall Street movement overall, by a 44/35 margin. But they’re a lot less charitable toward the Occupy Oakland version of that movement, which they give only a 30/48 favorability”
OWS has gotten off message, and comparisons of their situation to Egypt or Argentina are both instructive and a sign that they are badly misreading their situation.
The US is not Egypt or Argentina for any number of reasons. It is a badly thought out analogy that theatens to undermine the very real OWS accomplishments.
OWS is very off message right now.
Is it that OWS is off message or that the constant barrage of corporate media hit stories have finally taken their toll? I’d offer it’s the latter.